School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
S Afr Med J. 2013 May;103(5):309-12. doi: 10.7196/samj.6686.
Screening for asymptomatic diseases can reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality in all population groups. There is widespread geographical variation in the quality of care. Few data are available on national screening rates in South Africa and how these vary across the provinces.
To examine screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle (CDL), HIV and cancer in a privately insured population for a single insurer across all nine provinces in South Africa, and to determine whether or not there are any differences between the provinces.
Screening rates were calculated as the proportion of eligible members who had received screening tests during 2011 in each province. Mean screening rates were compared between Gauteng and the other eight provinces.
Nationwide screening rates were 20.5% for CDL, 8.2% for HIV and 31.9% for cancer. Despite similar insurance coverage, screening rates ranged from 0.3% to 0.95% lower in other provinces compared with Gauteng. Of all the provinces, Gauteng had the highestannual screening rates for CDL, breast cancer, prostate cancer and HIV (p < 0.001), while the Western Cape had the highest rate for cervical cancer (p < 0.001).
There is much variation in preventive care utilisation across the provinces within this health-insured population. Provinces with more abundant healthcare resources have higher screening rates. Further research is required to understand the reasons for the variation, given equal payment access.
无症状疾病筛查可以降低所有人群的发病和死亡负担。医疗保健质量在地理上存在广泛的差异。关于南非全国的筛查率以及这些率在各省之间的差异,相关数据很少。
在南非的所有 9 个省份中,为单一保险公司的私人保险人群检查生活方式相关慢性病(CDL)、艾滋病毒和癌症的筛查率,并确定各省之间是否存在差异。
以 2011 年每个省份符合条件的成员接受筛查测试的比例计算筛查率。比较高登省和其他 8 个省之间的平均筛查率。
全国 CDL、HIV 和癌症的筛查率分别为 20.5%、8.2%和 31.9%。尽管保险覆盖范围相似,但与高登省相比,其他省份的筛查率低 0.3%至 0.95%不等。在所有省份中,高登省的 CDL、乳腺癌、前列腺癌和 HIV 的年度筛查率最高(p<0.001),而西开普省的宫颈癌筛查率最高(p<0.001)。
在这个有医疗保险的人群中,各省之间的预防保健利用率存在很大差异。医疗资源丰富的省份的筛查率较高。需要进一步研究,了解在同等支付准入的情况下,这种差异的原因。