Thorel M F, Krichevsky M, Lévy-Frébault V V
Centre National d'Etudes Vétérinaires et Alimentaires, Laboratoire Central de Recherches Vétérinaires, Maisons Alfort, France.
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990 Jul;40(3):254-60. doi: 10.1099/00207713-40-3-254.
We performed a numerical taxonomy analysis of 38 Mycobacterium paratuberculosis and related mycobacterial strains, including wood pigeon mycobacteria; this analysis was based on 22 tests, which were selected for their potential discriminative value from a total of 51 tests studied and produced four well-defined clusters. Cluster 1 contained the M. paratuberculosis strains, including two strains isolated from Crohn's disease patients; cluster 2 contained Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare reference strains; cluster 3 consisted of the wood pigeon mycobacteria; and the only strain in cluster 4 was M. paratuberculosis 316F, which is used for antigen and vaccine production. Strains in cluster 1 were mycobactin dependent even when they were subcultured, whereas strains in cluster 3 were unable to grow on egg medium and their growth was stimulated by pH 5.5. Growth stimulation by pyruvate, resistance to D-cycloserine (50 micrograms/ml), and alkaline phosphatase activity also were characteristics that were useful for discriminating between clusters 1 and 3. The results of previous DNA-DNA hybridization studies have demonstrated that M. avium Chester 1901, M. paratuberculosis Bergey et al. 1923, and the wood pigeon mycobacteria belong to a single genomic species, and we propose that the name of this species should be M. avium. On the basis of the results of previous genomic analyses based on restriction fragment length, the results of polymorphism studies, and DNA patterns determined by field inversion gel electrophoresis as well as the results of our phenotypic study, we propose that the species should be divided into subspecies which correspond to pathogenicity and host range characteristics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们对38株副结核分枝杆菌及相关分枝杆菌菌株进行了数值分类分析,其中包括林鸽分枝杆菌;该分析基于22项检测,这些检测是从总共51项研究的检测中因其潜在鉴别价值而挑选出来的,并产生了四个明确的聚类。聚类1包含副结核分枝杆菌菌株,包括从克罗恩病患者分离出的两株菌株;聚类2包含鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌参考菌株;聚类3由林鸽分枝杆菌组成;聚类4中唯一的菌株是用于抗原和疫苗生产的副结核分枝杆菌316F。聚类1中的菌株即使在传代培养时也依赖分枝杆菌素,而聚类3中的菌株无法在鸡蛋培养基上生长,其生长受pH 5.5刺激。丙酮酸刺激生长、对D-环丝氨酸(50微克/毫升)的抗性以及碱性磷酸酶活性也是区分聚类1和聚类3的有用特征。先前DNA-DNA杂交研究的结果表明,鸟分枝杆菌切斯特1901、副结核分枝杆菌伯杰等人1923以及林鸽分枝杆菌属于单一基因组种,我们提议该种的名称应为鸟分枝杆菌。基于先前基于限制性片段长度的基因组分析结果、多态性研究结果、场反转凝胶电泳确定的DNA图谱以及我们的表型研究结果,我们提议将该种分为与致病性和宿主范围特征相对应的亚种。(摘要截短于250字)