• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用三维技术和几何形态计量分析来比较人类牙列与牙印的定量方法。

A quantitative method for comparing human dentition with tooth marks using three-dimensional technology and geometric morphometric analysis.

作者信息

Martin-de-Las-Heras Stella, Tafur Daniel, Bravo Manuel

机构信息

Department of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Odontology.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Jul;72(5):331-6. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.826383. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

DOI:10.3109/00016357.2013.826383
PMID:23972203
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a quantitative method to compare 3D overlays from dental casts with experimental bitemarks by using geometric morphometric analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen upper and lower dental casts and corresponding simulated bitemarks were 3D-scanned to generate comparison overlays with DentalPrint software(©). This study considered the inter-canine distance and four incisal angles. A matrix was created to compare all possible combinations of matches and non-matches between models and bites, i.e. 169 combinations (13 models × 13 bites), of which 13 were true matches. For each combination, the percentage difference was calculated between the variables in the model and the same variables in the bitemark. Logistic regression was used to obtain a predictive model (algorithm) for a match, calculating the discriminative values (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity) for each measure and for the logistic model.

RESULTS

Statistically significant discriminative power was found for all single (angle or distance) and combined (logistic model) variables, with lower 95% CI limits > 0.50 for areas under the ROC curves and sensitivity/specificity values > 50% in both maxilla and mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

This quantitative method has sufficient discriminative power to be utilized in forensic cases.

摘要

目的

通过几何形态测量分析,开发一种定量方法,用于比较牙模的三维叠加图与实验咬痕。

材料与方法

对13副上下颌牙模及相应的模拟咬痕进行三维扫描,以使用DentalPrint软件(©)生成比较叠加图。本研究考虑了犬齿间距离和四个切牙角。创建了一个矩阵,以比较模型与咬痕之间所有可能的匹配和不匹配组合,即169种组合(13个模型×13个咬痕),其中13种为真实匹配。对于每种组合,计算模型中的变量与咬痕中相同变量之间的百分比差异。使用逻辑回归获得匹配的预测模型(算法),计算每种测量方法以及逻辑模型的判别值(ROC曲线下面积、敏感性和特异性)。

结果

发现所有单一(角度或距离)和组合(逻辑模型)变量均具有统计学显著的判别力,上颌和下颌的ROC曲线下面积的95%置信区间下限均>0.50,敏感性/特异性值均>50%。

结论

这种定量方法具有足够的判别力,可用于法医案件。

相似文献

1
A quantitative method for comparing human dentition with tooth marks using three-dimensional technology and geometric morphometric analysis.一种使用三维技术和几何形态计量分析来比较人类牙列与牙印的定量方法。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Jul;72(5):331-6. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.826383. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
2
Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison.使用专有的三维比较方法,将具有三维属性的模拟人类皮肤咬痕与可疑咬人者进行比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Sep 10;190(1-3):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
3
A study of multiple bitemarks inflicted in human skin by a single dentition using geometric morphometric analysis.使用几何形态测量分析研究单个牙列在人体皮肤中造成的多个牙痕。
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Sep 10;211(1-3):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.028. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
4
Effect of systematic dental shape modification in bitemarks.系统牙形态修正对牙痕的影响。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 May 10;228(1-3):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
5
Uniqueness of the anterior dentition three-dimensionally assessed for forensic bitemark analysis.用于法医咬痕分析的前牙列三维评估的独特性。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Feb;46:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
6
Patterns of variation and match rates of the anterior biting dentition: characteristics of a database of 3D-scanned dentitions.前牙咬合牙列的变异模式与匹配率:三维扫描牙列数据库的特征
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jan;58(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02293.x.
7
Bitemarks and 3D scanner: An objective comparison for bitemarks. A pilot study.咬痕与3D扫描仪:咬痕的客观比较。一项初步研究。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2024 Feb;102:102639. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102639. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
8
Digital analysis of experimental human bitemarks: application of two new methods.人体实验咬痕的数字分析:两种新方法的应用
J Forensic Sci. 2006 Nov;51(6):1372-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00265.x.
9
Bitemarks: distortion and covariation of the maxillary and mandibular dentition as impressed in human skin.牙痕:上颌和下颌牙齿在人类皮肤上留下的变形和变化。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Nov 30;223(1-3):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.044. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
10
3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks.人类牙列与模拟咬痕的三维成像及定量比较
Int J Legal Med. 2007 Jan;121(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/s00414-005-0058-6. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Bitemark Analysis's Potential Application in Forensic Identification: A Systematic Review.咬痕分析在法医鉴定中的潜在应用评估:一项系统综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 4;14(11):1180. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111180.
2
A systematic review of 3D scanners and computer assisted analyzes of bite marks: searching for improved analysis methods during the Covid-19 pandemic.三维扫描仪和计算机辅助咬痕分析的系统评价:在新冠疫情期间寻找改进的分析方法。
Int J Legal Med. 2022 Jan;136(1):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02667-z. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
A comparative assessment of bite marks in analyzing the overlay generation using styrofoam sheet and modeling wax with the dental casts as one of the adjuncts for archiving the forensic records: An study.
使用聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料片和模型蜡分析叠加生成时咬痕的比较评估,并将牙模作为存档法医记录的辅助手段之一:一项研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018 Jan-Apr;22(1):132-137. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_141_17.
4
The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology.人类牙列作为法医证据的独特性:关于技术方法的系统评价
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Nov;129(6):1277-83. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1109-7. Epub 2014 Nov 15.