• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童口服对乙酰氨基酚的剂量和退热疗效。

Dosing and antipyretic efficacy of oral acetaminophen in children.

机构信息

McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1361-75.e1-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.022. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.022
PMID:23972576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A standardized approach to dosing acetaminophen in pediatric populations was published in 1983. That review proposed specific weight-related dosing for infants and children weighing 6 through 95 lb and an age-based schedule for children aged <4 months through 11 years. Subsequent clinical studies evaluating these and alternative doses of acetaminophen supported the recommended 10-15-mg/kg dose.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviewed published and unpublished pediatric antipyretic data to provide a critical assessment of the 10-15-mg/kg oral dose and the current pediatric oral dosing schedules for acetaminophen.

METHODS

Published literature and unpublished clinical trials that evaluated the antipyretic efficacy of acetaminophen in children were reviewed. The PubMed database was searched using the term acetaminophen or paracetamol, with study criteria limited to randomized, controlled trials; oral dosing; patient age <12 years; and publication between 1982 and August 2012. All of the sponsor's unpublished antipyretic clinical studies completed between 1980 and August 2012 and involving at least 1 oral-formulation acetaminophen-only treatment arm were identified. Data from published literature containing sufficient detail to verify doses; dosing frequency; and, when necessary, estimates from figures, and from acetaminophen arms of the unpublished studies were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen unpublished trials enrolled 705 children to receive an oral dose of 10-15 mg/kg of acetaminophen. This dose resulted in a rapid onset of temperature reduction, with a maximum temperature decrement of ~3 hours following administration. Results from 40 published clinical trials in which 2332 children received oral acetaminophen for fever support these findings. The most common adverse events reported in any of the reported studies were gastrointestinal in nature and generally mild in intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Data support the recommended 10-15-mg/kg oral dose and demonstrate that the age and weight schedules for over-the-counter acetaminophen proposed in 1983 remain appropriate.

摘要

背景

1983 年发表了一种标准化的儿童人群扑热息痛剂量方法。该综述提出了针对 6 至 95 磅婴儿和儿童的特定体重相关剂量以及 4 个月至 11 岁儿童的年龄计划。随后的临床研究评估了这些和替代剂量的扑热息痛,支持推荐的 10-15mg/kg 剂量。

目的

本文综述了已发表和未发表的儿科退热数据,以对 10-15mg/kg 口服剂量和目前的扑热息痛儿科口服剂量方案进行批判性评估。

方法

综述了评估儿童扑热息痛退热疗效的已发表文献和未发表临床试验。使用术语扑热息痛或对乙酰氨基酚在 PubMed 数据库中进行搜索,研究标准仅限于随机对照试验;口服剂量;患者年龄<12 岁;以及 1982 年至 2012 年 8 月间的出版物。确定了所有赞助商在 1980 年至 2012 年 8 月间完成的至少有 1 个口服制剂扑热息痛单一治疗组的未发表退热临床研究。分析了含有足够详细信息以验证剂量、给药频率的已发表文献数据;以及必要时从图中以及未发表研究的扑热息痛组中进行估计。

结果

13 项未发表的试验共纳入 705 名儿童,给予 10-15mg/kg 的口服扑热息痛剂量。该剂量可迅速降低体温,给药后约 3 小时达到最大体温下降。40 项已发表的临床试验中有 2332 名儿童接受口服扑热息痛退热,支持这些发现。报告的任何研究中最常见的不良事件是胃肠道性质的,通常为轻度。

结论

数据支持推荐的 10-15mg/kg 口服剂量,并表明 1983 年提出的非处方扑热息痛的年龄和体重方案仍然适用。

相似文献

1
Dosing and antipyretic efficacy of oral acetaminophen in children.儿童口服对乙酰氨基酚的剂量和退热疗效。
Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1361-75.e1-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.022. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
Determinants of antipyretic misuse in children up to 5 years of age: a cross-sectional study.5岁以下儿童退烧药误用的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):783-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.010.
3
Pediatric dosing of acetaminophen.对乙酰氨基酚的儿科用药剂量
Pediatr Pharmacol (New York). 1983;3(3-4):321-7.
4
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of fever in hospitalized pediatric patients.一项多中心、随机、开放标签、活性对照试验,以确定静脉注射布洛芬治疗住院儿科患者发热的疗效、安全性和药代动力学。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0795-y.
5
Acetaminophen pediatric dose selection: caregiver satisfaction regarding the antipyretic efficacy of acetaminophen in children.对乙酰氨基酚儿科剂量选择:照顾者对乙酰氨基酚在儿童中退热疗效的满意度。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012 Nov;51(11):1030-1. doi: 10.1177/0009922812456592. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
6
Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in children and adults: a meta-analysis and qualitative review.布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚在儿童和成人中的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析和定性评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):489-506. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M332. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
7
Aspirin compared with acetaminophen in the treatment of fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in adults: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, 6-hour dose-ranging study.阿司匹林与对乙酰氨基酚治疗成人发热及上呼吸道感染其他症状的比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照、平行组、单剂量、6小时剂量范围研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):993-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.002.
8
A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen compared to oral acetaminophen for the treatment of fever.一项静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与口服对乙酰氨基酚治疗发热的疗效和安全性的随机研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Apr;18(4):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01043.x.
9
Comparison of Antipyretic Efficacy of Intravenous (IV) Acetaminophen versus Oral (PO) Acetaminophen in the Management of Fever in Children.静脉注射(IV)对乙酰氨基酚与口服(PO)对乙酰氨基酚在儿童发热管理中的退热效果比较。
Indian J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;85(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2457-3. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
10
Antipyretic efficacy and tolerability of a single intravenous dose of the acetaminophen prodrug propacetamol in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.对乙酰氨基酚前体药物丙帕他莫单次静脉给药在儿童中的退热疗效及耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Common Selfcare Indications of Pain Medications in Children.儿童常见疼痛药物的自我护理适应证。
Paediatr Drugs. 2023 May;25(3):321-341. doi: 10.1007/s40272-023-00562-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
The Antipyretic Effect of High-Dose Paracetamol Versus Mefenamic Acid in the Treatment of Febrile Children: A Randomized Control Trial.高剂量对乙酰氨基酚与甲芬那酸治疗发热儿童的退热效果:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2022 Jul 11;14(7):e26733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26733. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Urgent need to standardize labelling of acetaminophen-paediatric liquid drug products in Saudi Arabia.
沙特阿拉伯迫切需要规范对乙酰氨基酚儿科液体药品的标签。
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2022 Mar;9(1):62-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) use in infants and children was never shown to be safe for neurodevelopment: a systematic review with citation tracking.对婴儿和儿童使用扑热息痛(对乙酰氨基酚)从未被证明对神经发育是安全的:一项有引文追踪的系统评价。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 May;181(5):1835-1857. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04407-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Preliminary Study on Hepatoprotective Effect and Mechanism of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate against Acetaminophen-induced Liver Injury in Rats.(-)-表没食子儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯对乙酰氨基酚诱导的大鼠肝损伤的保肝作用及其机制的初步研究
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Summer;20(3):46-56. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.112727.13918.
6
Symptomatic fever management in children: A systematic review of national and international guidelines.儿童有症状发热的管理:国家和国际指南的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0245815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245815. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of high temperature on pandemic and seasonal human influenza viral replication and infection-induced damage in primary human tracheal epithelial cell cultures.高温对人原代气管上皮细胞培养物中甲型流感病毒大流行株和季节性流行株复制及感染所致损伤的影响
Heliyon. 2019 Feb 5;5(2):e01149. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01149. eCollection 2019 Feb.
8
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Acetaminophen Dosing Regimens in Febrile Infants and Children: A Report on 3 Legacy Studies.两种对乙酰氨基酚给药方案在发热婴幼儿和儿童中的疗效与安全性比较:三项既往研究报告
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb;22(1):22-32. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.22.
9
Rectal Diclofenac Versus Rectal Paracetamol: Comparison of Antipyretic Effectiveness in Children.直肠用双氯芬酸与直肠用对乙酰氨基酚:儿童退热效果比较
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Jan 13;18(1):e27932. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.27932. eCollection 2016 Jan.
10
Recent Advances in Pediatric Use of Oral Paracetamol in Fever and Pain Management.儿科口服扑热息痛在发热和疼痛管理中的最新进展。
Pain Ther. 2015 Dec;4(2):149-68. doi: 10.1007/s40122-015-0040-z. Epub 2015 Oct 30.