Suppr超能文献

高剂量对乙酰氨基酚与甲芬那酸治疗发热儿童的退热效果:一项随机对照试验

The Antipyretic Effect of High-Dose Paracetamol Versus Mefenamic Acid in the Treatment of Febrile Children: A Randomized Control Trial.

作者信息

Loya Amruta, Siddiqui Mohd Saeed, Sangle Avinash, Ingale Vinod, Saha Shreya, Nelanuthala Madhurasree

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Mission (MGM) Medical College and Hospital, a Constituent Unit of MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Aurangabad, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jul 11;14(7):e26733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26733. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction Fever is the most common presenting symptom in children and causes distress in patients and parents. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used as antipyretics, they should be reserved for pain or chronic inflammatory conditions due to safety concerns. If we can safely achieve the same antipyretic effect using a higher dose (20 mg/kg) of paracetamol, NSAIDs may be avoided for treating fever. There is a paucity of literature comparing the antipyretic effect of mefenamic acid and high-dose paracetamol. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the antipyretic effect of high-dose paracetamol and mefenamic acid. Methods In this randomized control trial, 165 febrile children were randomly allocated to one of the following three groups: standard-dose (15 mg/kg) paracetamol (SDPCM) as the control group and high-dose (20 mg/kg) paracetamol (HDPCM) and mefenamic acid (6 mg/kg) (MFN) as the intervention groups. The temperature was measured using a digital thermometer at the start of drug dosage and every 15 minutes until it reached normal. One-way between-group analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare outcome measures such as time for temperature to reach normal, fall of temperature in 60 minutes, and time for the next fever. Post hoc analysis was performed to compare mean differences. Patients were monitored for adverse effects. Results Out of 165 enrolled patients, 159 were analyzed. The baseline demographic data were comparable among the groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean time taken for the temperature to reach normal (F-value (F) (2,156)=3.184, p<0.05) and the mean reduction in temperature at 60 minutes (F (2,156)=23.40, p<0.001) among the groups. The mean time for temperature to reach normal in the SDPCM group (97.50±26.60 minutes) was longer than that in the HDPCM (85.09±31.43 minutes) and MFN (84.90±30.42 minutes) groups. The decrease in temperature over 60 minutes was greater in the HDPCM (0.46°C±0.19°C) and MFN (0.45°C±0.11°C) groups than in the SDPCM (0.33°C±0.10°C) group. The time to the next fever spike was shorter for the SDPCM group (5.07±2.66 hours) than for the HDPCM (7.20±3.08 hours) and MFN (8.82±3.83 hours) groups. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that high-dose paracetamol and mefenamic acid had similar and faster antipyretic effects than standard-dose paracetamol. Although the duration of action was found to be longer in the mefenamic acid group, the difference was not statistically significant. There were negligible adverse effects in the groups. Conclusion  Standard-dose paracetamol (15 mg/kg/dose) had a slower and shorter antipyretic effect than high-dose paracetamol (20 mg/kg/dose) and mefenamic acid (6 mg/kg/dose). A single dose of high-dose paracetamol was safe and had a similar antipyretic effect as mefenamic acid. Mefenamic acid may be avoided as an antipyretic and spared for pain and anti-inflammatory indications. Multicentered double-blind clinical trials with larger sample sizes and comparisons of other NSAIDs will be required to confirm these findings.

摘要

引言

发热是儿童最常见的就诊症状,会给患儿及其家长带来困扰。尽管非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通常用作退烧药,但出于安全考虑,应仅用于疼痛或慢性炎症性疾病。如果使用较高剂量(20mg/kg)的对乙酰氨基酚能够安全地达到相同的退热效果,那么在治疗发热时可避免使用NSAIDs。关于甲芬那酸与高剂量对乙酰氨基酚退热效果比较的文献较少。我们假设高剂量对乙酰氨基酚和甲芬那酸的退热效果没有差异。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,165名发热儿童被随机分配到以下三组之一:标准剂量(15mg/kg)对乙酰氨基酚(SDPCM)作为对照组,高剂量(20mg/kg)对乙酰氨基酚(HDPCM)和甲芬那酸(6mg/kg)(MFN)作为干预组。在给药开始时使用数字温度计测量体温,此后每15分钟测量一次,直至体温恢复正常。采用组间单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较体温恢复正常所需时间、60分钟内体温下降幅度以及下次发热时间等结果指标。进行事后分析以比较均值差异。对患者进行不良反应监测。

结果

在165名登记患者中,159名被纳入分析。各组间基线人口统计学数据具有可比性。各组间体温恢复正常的平均时间(F值(F)(2,156)=3.184,p<0.05)和60分钟时体温的平均下降幅度(F(2,156)=23.40,p<0.001)存在统计学显著差异。SDPCM组体温恢复正常的平均时间(97.50±26.60分钟)长于HDPCM组(85.09±31.43分钟)和MFN组(84.90±30.42分钟)。HDPCM组(0.46°C±0.19°C)和MFN组(0.45°C±0.11°C)60分钟内的体温下降幅度大于SDPCM组(0.33°C±0.10°C)。SDPCM组下次发热高峰出现的时间(5.07±2.66小时)短于HDPCM组(7.20±3.08小时)和MFN组(8.82±3.83小时)。事后分析表明,高剂量对乙酰氨基酚和甲芬那酸的退热效果相似且比标准剂量对乙酰氨基酚更快。尽管发现甲芬那酸组的作用持续时间更长,但差异无统计学意义。各组的不良反应可忽略不计。

结论

标准剂量对乙酰氨基酚(15mg/kg/剂量)的退热效果比高剂量对乙酰氨基酚(20mg/kg/剂量)和甲芬那酸(6mg/kg/剂量)更慢且更短。单次高剂量对乙酰氨基酚安全,且与甲芬那酸具有相似的退热效果。可避免将甲芬那酸用作退烧药,而留作疼痛和抗炎适应症使用。需要开展更大样本量的多中心双盲临床试验以及对其他NSAIDs进行比较来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验