• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量对乙酰氨基酚与甲芬那酸治疗发热儿童的退热效果:一项随机对照试验

The Antipyretic Effect of High-Dose Paracetamol Versus Mefenamic Acid in the Treatment of Febrile Children: A Randomized Control Trial.

作者信息

Loya Amruta, Siddiqui Mohd Saeed, Sangle Avinash, Ingale Vinod, Saha Shreya, Nelanuthala Madhurasree

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Mission (MGM) Medical College and Hospital, a Constituent Unit of MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Aurangabad, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jul 11;14(7):e26733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26733. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.26733
PMID:35967183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9363685/
Abstract

Introduction Fever is the most common presenting symptom in children and causes distress in patients and parents. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used as antipyretics, they should be reserved for pain or chronic inflammatory conditions due to safety concerns. If we can safely achieve the same antipyretic effect using a higher dose (20 mg/kg) of paracetamol, NSAIDs may be avoided for treating fever. There is a paucity of literature comparing the antipyretic effect of mefenamic acid and high-dose paracetamol. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the antipyretic effect of high-dose paracetamol and mefenamic acid. Methods In this randomized control trial, 165 febrile children were randomly allocated to one of the following three groups: standard-dose (15 mg/kg) paracetamol (SDPCM) as the control group and high-dose (20 mg/kg) paracetamol (HDPCM) and mefenamic acid (6 mg/kg) (MFN) as the intervention groups. The temperature was measured using a digital thermometer at the start of drug dosage and every 15 minutes until it reached normal. One-way between-group analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare outcome measures such as time for temperature to reach normal, fall of temperature in 60 minutes, and time for the next fever. Post hoc analysis was performed to compare mean differences. Patients were monitored for adverse effects. Results Out of 165 enrolled patients, 159 were analyzed. The baseline demographic data were comparable among the groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean time taken for the temperature to reach normal (F-value (F) (2,156)=3.184, p<0.05) and the mean reduction in temperature at 60 minutes (F (2,156)=23.40, p<0.001) among the groups. The mean time for temperature to reach normal in the SDPCM group (97.50±26.60 minutes) was longer than that in the HDPCM (85.09±31.43 minutes) and MFN (84.90±30.42 minutes) groups. The decrease in temperature over 60 minutes was greater in the HDPCM (0.46°C±0.19°C) and MFN (0.45°C±0.11°C) groups than in the SDPCM (0.33°C±0.10°C) group. The time to the next fever spike was shorter for the SDPCM group (5.07±2.66 hours) than for the HDPCM (7.20±3.08 hours) and MFN (8.82±3.83 hours) groups. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that high-dose paracetamol and mefenamic acid had similar and faster antipyretic effects than standard-dose paracetamol. Although the duration of action was found to be longer in the mefenamic acid group, the difference was not statistically significant. There were negligible adverse effects in the groups. Conclusion  Standard-dose paracetamol (15 mg/kg/dose) had a slower and shorter antipyretic effect than high-dose paracetamol (20 mg/kg/dose) and mefenamic acid (6 mg/kg/dose). A single dose of high-dose paracetamol was safe and had a similar antipyretic effect as mefenamic acid. Mefenamic acid may be avoided as an antipyretic and spared for pain and anti-inflammatory indications. Multicentered double-blind clinical trials with larger sample sizes and comparisons of other NSAIDs will be required to confirm these findings.

摘要

引言

发热是儿童最常见的就诊症状,会给患儿及其家长带来困扰。尽管非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通常用作退烧药,但出于安全考虑,应仅用于疼痛或慢性炎症性疾病。如果使用较高剂量(20mg/kg)的对乙酰氨基酚能够安全地达到相同的退热效果,那么在治疗发热时可避免使用NSAIDs。关于甲芬那酸与高剂量对乙酰氨基酚退热效果比较的文献较少。我们假设高剂量对乙酰氨基酚和甲芬那酸的退热效果没有差异。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,165名发热儿童被随机分配到以下三组之一:标准剂量(15mg/kg)对乙酰氨基酚(SDPCM)作为对照组,高剂量(20mg/kg)对乙酰氨基酚(HDPCM)和甲芬那酸(6mg/kg)(MFN)作为干预组。在给药开始时使用数字温度计测量体温,此后每15分钟测量一次,直至体温恢复正常。采用组间单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较体温恢复正常所需时间、60分钟内体温下降幅度以及下次发热时间等结果指标。进行事后分析以比较均值差异。对患者进行不良反应监测。

结果

在165名登记患者中,159名被纳入分析。各组间基线人口统计学数据具有可比性。各组间体温恢复正常的平均时间(F值(F)(2,156)=3.184,p<0.05)和60分钟时体温的平均下降幅度(F(2,156)=23.40,p<0.001)存在统计学显著差异。SDPCM组体温恢复正常的平均时间(97.50±26.60分钟)长于HDPCM组(85.09±31.43分钟)和MFN组(84.90±30.42分钟)。HDPCM组(0.46°C±0.19°C)和MFN组(0.45°C±0.11°C)60分钟内的体温下降幅度大于SDPCM组(0.33°C±0.10°C)。SDPCM组下次发热高峰出现的时间(5.07±2.66小时)短于HDPCM组(7.20±3.08小时)和MFN组(8.82±3.83小时)。事后分析表明,高剂量对乙酰氨基酚和甲芬那酸的退热效果相似且比标准剂量对乙酰氨基酚更快。尽管发现甲芬那酸组的作用持续时间更长,但差异无统计学意义。各组的不良反应可忽略不计。

结论

标准剂量对乙酰氨基酚(15mg/kg/剂量)的退热效果比高剂量对乙酰氨基酚(20mg/kg/剂量)和甲芬那酸(6mg/kg/剂量)更慢且更短。单次高剂量对乙酰氨基酚安全,且与甲芬那酸具有相似的退热效果。可避免将甲芬那酸用作退烧药,而留作疼痛和抗炎适应症使用。需要开展更大样本量的多中心双盲临床试验以及对其他NSAIDs进行比较来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
The Antipyretic Effect of High-Dose Paracetamol Versus Mefenamic Acid in the Treatment of Febrile Children: A Randomized Control Trial.高剂量对乙酰氨基酚与甲芬那酸治疗发热儿童的退热效果:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2022 Jul 11;14(7):e26733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26733. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童采用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合及交替治疗。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):675-729. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1978.
3
Efficacy of oral mefenamic acid paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for needle pain in children receiving vaccination: a three-arm, parallel, triple-blind, placebo-controlled MAP VaC randomized controlled trial.口服甲芬那酸-对乙酰氨基酚作为预防接种儿童注射疼痛的镇痛剂的疗效:一项三臂、平行、三盲、安慰剂对照的MAP VaC随机对照试验。
Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2023 Dec 6;11:25151355231216122. doi: 10.1177/25151355231216122. eCollection 2023.
4
Choice of antipyretic in children.儿童退烧药的选择。
J Assoc Physicians India. 1995 Sep;43(9):614-6.
5
Cochrane in context: Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.Cochrane背景下:对发热儿童联合及交替使用对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬治疗
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):730-2. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1979.
6
Randomized controlled study of the antipyretic efficacy of oral paracetamol, intravenous paracetamol, and intramuscular diclofenac in patients presenting with fever to the emergency department.随机对照研究口服对乙酰氨基酚、静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚和肌内注射双氯芬酸在急诊科发热患者中的退热疗效。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2013;9:371-6. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S45802. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
7
Paracetamol and ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children: the PITCH randomised controlled trial.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬用于治疗儿童发热:PITCH随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(27):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-163. doi: 10.3310/hta13270.
8
Lowest effective single dose of diclofenac for antipyretic and analgesic effects in acute febrile sore throat.双氯芬酸钠退热和镇痛作用的最低有效单剂量在急性发热性咽痛中的应用。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(4):263-71. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323040-00006.
9
Equivalent antipyretic activity of ibuprofen and paracetamol in febrile children.布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚在发热儿童中的等效退热活性。
J Pediatr. 1997 Nov;131(5):683-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70093-3.
10
Ketoprofen versus paracetamol (acetaminophen) or ibuprofen in the management of fever: results of two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, repeated-dose, multicentre, phase III studies in children.酮洛芬对比扑热息痛(对乙酰氨基酚)或布洛芬用于儿童发热的管理:两项随机、双盲、双模拟、平行分组、重复剂量、多中心、III 期研究的结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(6):375-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03256907.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus on the Use of Mefenamic Acid in Pediatric Practice (MAPP): Perspectives From Indian Pediatricians.小儿科使用甲芬那酸的共识(MAPP):印度儿科医生的观点
Cureus. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):e88412. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88412. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Perioperative Management Conundrum for a Case With Multiple Commonly Used Drug Hypersensitivity.一例多种常用药物过敏病例的围手术期管理难题
Cureus. 2024 Jan 26;16(1):e53015. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53015. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical and safety review of paracetamol and ibuprofen in children.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬在儿童中的临床与安全性综述
Inflammopharmacology. 2017 Feb;25(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10787-016-0302-3. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Fever and the thermal regulation of immunity: the immune system feels the heat.发热与免疫的体温调节:免疫系统能感知热度。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Jun;15(6):335-49. doi: 10.1038/nri3843. Epub 2015 May 15.
3
Fever management: Evidence vs current practice.发热管理:证据与当前实践
World J Clin Pediatr. 2012 Dec 8;1(4):29-33. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v1.i4.29.
4
Randomized comparative trial of efficacy of paracetamol, ibuprofen and paracetamol-ibuprofen combination for treatment of febrile children.对乙酰氨基酚、布洛芬及对乙酰氨基酚 - 布洛芬组合治疗发热儿童疗效的随机对照试验
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Jan;5(1):25-31. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.124567.
5
Management of acute fever in children: guideline for community healthcare providers and pharmacists.儿童急性发热的管理:社区医疗保健提供者和药剂师指南。
S Afr Med J. 2013 Sep 3;103(12):948-54. doi: 10.7196/samj.7207.
6
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童联合及交替使用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD009572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009572.pub2.
7
Dosing and antipyretic efficacy of oral acetaminophen in children.儿童口服对乙酰氨基酚的剂量和退热疗效。
Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1361-75.e1-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.022. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Postoperative analgesic efficacy of single high dose and low dose rectal acetaminophen in pediatric ophthalmic surgery.单次高剂量与低剂量直肠用对乙酰氨基酚在小儿眼科手术中的术后镇痛效果
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;28(4):460-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.101906.
9
Fever and antipyretic use in children.儿童发热与解热药使用。
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):580-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3852. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
10
Therapeutic acetaminophen is not associated with liver injury in children: a systematic review.治疗剂量的对乙酰氨基酚与儿童肝损伤无关:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):e1430-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3352. Epub 2010 Nov 22.