• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿常见针穿刺过程中疼痛的非药物管理:当前研究证据和实际考虑。

Nonpharmacological management of pain during common needle puncture procedures in infants: current research evidence and practical considerations.

机构信息

Nursing, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Perinatol. 2013 Sep;40(3):493-508. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.clp.2013.05.003
PMID:23972753
Abstract

All infants undergo painful procedures involving skin puncture as part of routine medical care. Pain from needle puncture procedures is suboptimally managed. Numerous nonpharmacologic interventions are available for these painful procedures, including swaddling, holding, skin-to-skin care, pacifier, sweet-tasting solutions, and breast-feeding. Adoption of nonpharmacologic pain-relieving interventions into routine clinical practice is feasible and should be a standard of care in the delivery of quality health care for infants. This review summarizes current knowledge about the epidemiology of pain from common needle puncture procedures in infants, the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic interventions, implementation considerations, and unanswered questions for future research.

摘要

所有婴儿在常规医疗护理中都要经历涉及皮肤穿刺的痛苦程序。对于针穿刺程序引起的疼痛,处理效果并不理想。对于这些痛苦的程序,有许多非药物干预措施可用,包括襁褓、抱持、皮肤接触护理、安抚奶嘴、甜味溶液和母乳喂养。将非药物止痛干预措施纳入常规临床实践是可行的,并且应该成为为婴儿提供优质医疗保健护理的标准。这篇综述总结了目前关于婴儿常见针穿刺程序引起的疼痛的流行病学、非药物干预措施的有效性、实施注意事项以及未来研究中需要回答的问题的相关知识。

相似文献

1
Nonpharmacological management of pain during common needle puncture procedures in infants: current research evidence and practical considerations.婴儿常见针穿刺过程中疼痛的非药物管理:当前研究证据和实际考虑。
Clin Perinatol. 2013 Sep;40(3):493-508. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
2
Nonpharmacologic Management of Pain During Common Needle Puncture Procedures in Infants: Current Research Evidence and Practical Considerations: An Update.婴儿常见针刺操作时疼痛的非药物管理:当前研究证据和实际考虑因素:更新。
Clin Perinatol. 2019 Dec;46(4):709-730. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
3
Nonpharmacological Interventions to Mitigate Procedural Pain in the NICU: An Integrative Review.非药物干预措施减轻新生儿重症监护病房程序性疼痛:综合评价。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2024 Aug 1;24(4):364-373. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000001164. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
4
Procedural pain management for neonates using nonpharmacological strategies: part 2: mother-driven interventions.使用非药物策略对新生儿进行程序性疼痛管理:第2部分:母亲驱动的干预措施。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Oct;11(5):312-8; quiz pg 319-20. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318229aa76.
5
The effect of expressed breast milk, swaddling and facilitated tucking methods in reducing the pain caused by orogastric tube insertion in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial.经口胃管插入引起的疼痛:表达母乳、襁褓和促进包裹方法的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Apr;104:103532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103532. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Non-nutritive sucking and facilitated tucking relieve preterm infant pain during heel-stick procedures: a prospective, randomised controlled crossover trial.非营养性吸吮和辅助包裹缓解足跟采血过程中早产儿疼痛:一项前瞻性、随机对照交叉试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.017. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
7
Facilitated tucking to reduce pain in neonates: evidence for best practice.采用辅助包裹法减轻新生儿疼痛:最佳实践证据
Adv Neonatal Care. 2015 Jun;15(3):201-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000193.
8
A randomized-controlled trial of parent-led tactile stimulation to reduce pain during infant immunization injections.一项父母主导的触觉刺激减少婴儿免疫接种注射疼痛的随机对照试验。
Clin J Pain. 2014 Mar;30(3):259-65. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318296079e.
9
Oral sucrose and "facilitated tucking" for repeated pain relief in preterms: a randomized controlled trial.口腔蔗糖和“辅助包裹”在早产儿中重复缓解疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):299-308. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1879. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
Pain management in newborns.新生儿疼痛管理
Clin Perinatol. 2014 Dec;41(4):895-924. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Parenting Pain Away: Development and usability testing of an educational website about infant procedural pain management.消除育儿之痛:一个关于婴儿程序性疼痛管理的教育网站的开发与可用性测试
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023 Feb 21;6(3):60-79. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12096. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Improving pain management in a neonatal intensive care unit with single-family room-A quality improvement project.通过单人家庭病房改善新生儿重症监护病房的疼痛管理——一项质量改进项目
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2022 Feb 25;4(2):69-77. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12075. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Special issue on knowledge mobilization: Neonatal pain.
知识转化专题:新生儿疼痛
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2020 Sep 3;2(3):61-62. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12039. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Turkish Neonatal Society guideline on the neonatal pain and its management.土耳其新生儿学会关于新生儿疼痛及其管理的指南。
Turk Pediatri Ars. 2018 Dec 25;53(Suppl 1):S161-S171. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.01802. eCollection 2018.
5
Long-Term Effects of Chronic Buspirone during Adolescence Reduce the Adverse Influences of Neonatal Inflammatory Pain and Stress on Adaptive Behavior in Adult Male Rats.青春期慢性服用丁螺环酮的长期影响可减轻新生儿炎性疼痛和应激对成年雄性大鼠适应性行为的不利影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jan 26;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00011. eCollection 2017.
6
Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials.疫苗注射的程序和物理干预措施:随机对照试验和半随机对照试验的系统评价
Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S20-37. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000264.
7
The effect of audio therapy to treat postoperative pain in children undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial.音频疗法对接受大手术的儿童术后疼痛的治疗效果:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Feb;31(2):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3649-9. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
8
Neonate pain management: what do nurses really know?新生儿疼痛管理:护士究竟了解多少?
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Jul 14;6(5):284-93. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n5p284.