Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, 1161 21st Avenue South, Medical Center North, S-2323, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA,
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Dec;69(12):2055-64. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1576-7. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
Population pharmacokinetic (PK) data collected from routine clinical practice offers a rich source of valuable information. However, in observational population PK data, accurate time information for blood samples is often missing, resulting in measurement errors (ME) in the sampling time variable. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects on model parameters when a scheduled time is used instead of the actual blood sampling time, and to propose ME correction methods.
Simulation studies were conducted based on two major factors: the curvature in PK profiles and the size of ME. As ME correction methods, transform both sides (TBS) models were developed with application of Box-Cox power transformation and Taylor expansion. The TBS models were compared to a conventional population PK model using simulations.
The most important determinant of bias due to time ME was the degree of curvature (nonlinearity) in PK profiles; the smaller the curvature around sampling times, the smaller the associated bias. The second important determinant was the magnitude of ME; the larger the ME, the larger the bias. The proposed TBS models performed better than a conventional population PK modeling when curvature and ME were substantial.
Time ME in sampling time can lead to bias on the parameter estimators. The following practical recommendations are provided: 1) when the curvature of PK profiles is small, conventional population PK modeling is robust to even large ME; and 2) when the curvature is moderate or large, the proposed methodology reduces bias in parameter estimates.
从常规临床实践中收集的群体药代动力学(PK)数据提供了丰富的有价值信息来源。然而,在观察性群体 PK 数据中,血样的准确时间信息经常缺失,导致采样时间变量存在测量误差(ME)。本研究旨在探讨当使用计划时间而不是实际采血时间时对模型参数的影响,并提出 ME 校正方法。
基于两个主要因素进行模拟研究:PK 曲线的曲率和 ME 的大小。作为 ME 校正方法,应用 Box-Cox 幂变换和泰勒展开开发了双侧变换(TBS)模型。通过模拟比较了 TBS 模型与传统群体 PK 模型。
由时间 ME 引起的偏倚的最重要决定因素是 PK 曲线的曲率(非线性)程度;采样时间周围的曲率越小,相关的偏倚越小。第二个重要决定因素是 ME 的大小;ME 越大,偏差越大。当曲率和 ME 较大时,与传统群体 PK 建模相比,所提出的 TBS 模型的性能更好。
采样时间的 ME 可能导致参数估计值的偏差。现提供以下实际建议:1)当 PK 曲线的曲率较小时,即使存在较大的 ME,传统的群体 PK 建模也具有稳健性;2)当曲率适中或较大时,所提出的方法可减少参数估计值的偏差。