Burström Kristina, Sun Sun, Gerdtham Ulf-G, Henriksson Martin, Johannesson Magnus, Levin Lars-Åke, Zethraeus Niklas
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden,
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):431-42. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0496-4. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
To estimate Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states using general population health survey data.
Approximately 45,000 individuals valued their current health status by means of time trade off (TTO) and visual analogue scale (VAS) methods and answered the EQ-5D questionnaire, making it possible to model the association between the experience-based TTO and VAS values and the EQ-5D dimensions and severity levels. The association between TTO and VAS values and the different severity levels of respondents' answers on a self-rated health (SRH) question was assessed.
Almost all dimensions (except usual activity) and severity levels had less impact on TTO valuations compared with the UK study based on hypothetical values. Anxiety/depression had the greatest impact on both TTO and VAS values. TTO and VAS values were consistently related to SRH. The inclusion of age, sex, education and socioeconomic group affected the main effect coefficients and the explanatory power modestly.
A value set for EQ-5D health states based on Swedish valuations has been lacking. Several authors have recently advocated the normative standpoint of using experience-based values. Guidelines of economic evaluation for reimbursement decisions in Sweden recommend the use of experience-based values for QALY calculations. Our results that anxiety/depression had the greatest impact on both TTO and VAS values underline the importance of mental health for individuals' overall HRQoL. Using population surveys is in line with recent thinking on valuing health states and could reduce some of the focusing effects potentially appearing in hypothetical valuation studies.
利用一般人群健康调查数据估算瑞典基于经验的EQ - 5D健康状态价值集。
约45000人通过时间权衡(TTO)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)方法对其当前健康状况进行评估,并回答EQ - 5D问卷,从而能够对基于经验的TTO和VAS值与EQ - 5D维度及严重程度水平之间的关联进行建模。评估了TTO和VAS值与受访者在自评健康(SRH)问题上不同严重程度答案之间的关联。
与基于假设值的英国研究相比,几乎所有维度(除日常活动外)和严重程度水平对TTO估值的影响都较小。焦虑/抑郁对TTO和VAS值的影响最大。TTO和VAS值与SRH始终相关。纳入年龄、性别、教育程度和社会经济群体对主要效应系数和解释力有适度影响。
一直缺乏基于瑞典估值的EQ - 5D健康状态价值集。几位作者最近主张采用基于经验的价值的规范立场。瑞典报销决策经济评估指南建议在计算QALY时使用基于经验的价值。我们的结果表明焦虑/抑郁对TTO和VAS值的影响最大,这凸显了心理健康对个体总体健康相关生活质量的重要性。使用人群调查符合近期对健康状态估值的思路,并且可以减少假设估值研究中可能出现的一些聚焦效应。