• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶髂关节融合术的结果记录:既往脊柱融合术会影响结果吗?

Documentation of outcomes for sacroiliac joint fusion: does prior spinal fusion influence the outcome?

作者信息

Slinkard Nate, Agel Julie, Swiontkowski Marc F

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Av., Suite R200, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2968-1. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-013-2968-1
PMID:23975440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3804715/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective case series (level II) was to determine the clinical outcomes of anterior SIJ fusion, comparing the outcomes of patients who had prior spinal fusions at any level compared to patients who have not.

METHODS

This prospective study included 25 patients who underwent SIJ fusion with anterior plate fixation. All patients had failed non-operative treatment, had a positive Patrick test, and positive response to intra-articular SIJ injections with greater than 50 % pain relief. Patients had follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months where they completed Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) surveys. Outcome data are available for 19 patients who completed pre-operative and 12-month follow-up surveys. Their average time of the final follow-up was 1.1 years (range 10-33 months).

RESULTS

Significant improvements between pre-operative and the final follow-up in ODI (p = 0.007) and SMFA (p = 0.01) were observed; the ODI assessed outcomes in patients who had previous spinal fusion surgery were significantly worse than those that did not at the final follow-up (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Patients who have not undergone prior spinal fusion surgery, regardless of age, gender, and BMI have better outcomes following anterior SIJ fusion.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性病例系列研究(II级)旨在确定骶髂关节前路融合术的临床疗效,比较曾在任何节段接受过脊柱融合术的患者与未接受过脊柱融合术的患者的疗效。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了25例行骶髂关节前路钢板固定融合术的患者。所有患者均经非手术治疗失败,Patrick试验阳性,关节内注射骶髂关节后疼痛缓解超过50%且反应阳性。患者在3、6、9和12个月时进行随访,期间完成Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和简短肌肉骨骼功能评估(SMFA)调查。现有19例完成术前和12个月随访调查患者的结果数据。他们的最终随访平均时间为1.1年(范围10 - 33个月)。

结果

观察到术前与最终随访时ODI(p = 0.007)和SMFA(p = 0.01)有显著改善;在最终随访时,接受过脊柱融合手术患者的ODI评估结果显著差于未接受过脊柱融合手术的患者(p = 0.04)。

结论

未接受过脊柱融合手术的患者,无论年龄、性别和体重指数如何,在骶髂关节前路融合术后疗效更佳。

相似文献

1
Documentation of outcomes for sacroiliac joint fusion: does prior spinal fusion influence the outcome?骶髂关节融合术的结果记录:既往脊柱融合术会影响结果吗?
Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2968-1. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.微创骶髂关节融合术、射频神经消融术与保守治疗对骶髂关节痛的 6 年对比性病例系列研究。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;82(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx185.
4
Distraction arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint: 2-year results of a descriptive prospective multi-center cohort study in 171 patients.骶髂关节撑开融合术:171例患者的描述性前瞻性多中心队列研究2年结果
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):194-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5313-2. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?微创与开放骶髂关节融合术:它们的安全性和有效性是否相似?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1831-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3499-8.
6
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.保守治疗与微创外科治疗骶髂关节疼痛的随机对照试验 1 年结果。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
7
Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: an anterior approach and clinical outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow-up.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的骶髂关节融合术:一种前路手术及至少5年随访的临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):279-285. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17115. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
8
Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.BMI 对骶髂关节融合结果的影响:研究证据以改善保险指南。
Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
9
Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.腰椎或腰骶椎融合内固定术后骶髂关节退变:一项为期五年随访的前瞻性队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):1192-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35.
10
One-year results of minimally invasive fusion surgery of the sacroiliac joint as an alternative treatment after failed endoscopic thermal coagulation.骶髂关节微创融合手术作为内镜热凝治疗失败后的替代治疗的一年结果。
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1125-1138. doi: 10.3233/THC-213183.

引用本文的文献

1
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.国际脊柱手术进展协会2020年政策更新——微创骶髂关节融合术(用于慢性骶髂关节疼痛):覆盖范围、适应症、局限性及医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):860-895. doi: 10.14444/7156. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
Patient Reported Outcomes from Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.骶髂关节融合术的患者报告结局
Asian Spine J. 2017 Feb;11(1):120-126. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.120. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1924-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4490-8. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.一项利用外侧经关节技术进行微创骶髂关节融合术的系统评价。
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 22;9:40. doi: 10.14444/2040. eCollection 2015.
5
Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.使用三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的五年临床和影像学结果。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 17;8:375-83. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010375. eCollection 2014.
6
One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis.使用一系列三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的一年疗效:一项多中心、患者层面的分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Aug 28;7:299-304. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S56491. eCollection 2014.
7
Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.开放手术与微创骶髂关节融合术的比较疗效
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jun 5;7:187-93. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S60370. eCollection 2014.
8
Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?微创与开放骶髂关节融合术:它们的安全性和有效性是否相似?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1831-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3499-8.
9
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.米歇尔·贝努瓦和罗伯特·马尔霍兰德年度《欧洲脊柱杂志》综述:对《欧洲脊柱杂志》2013年“外科手术与研究”文章的一项调查。
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3126-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
10
Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.开放手术与微创骶髂关节融合术:围手术期指标及临床结局的多中心比较
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013 Oct 30;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-7-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.腰椎或腰骶椎融合内固定术后骶髂关节退变:一项为期五年随访的前瞻性队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):1192-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35.
2
Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome.双侧骶髂关节融合术治疗退行性骶髂关节综合征后预后不佳。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2006 Jun;72(3):296-308.
3
Provocation sacroiliac joint tests have validity in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain.激发性骶髂关节试验在骶髂关节疼痛的诊断中具有有效性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jun;87(6):874; author reply 874-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.007.
4
Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节疾病行骶髂关节融合术的功能及影像学结果
Spine J. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):520-8; discussion 529. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.022.
5
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: evaluation and management.骶髂关节功能障碍:评估与管理
Clin J Pain. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):446-55. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000131413.07468.8e.
6
Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests.骶髂关节疼痛的诊断:个体激发试验及试验组合的效度
Man Ther. 2005 Aug;10(3):207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.003.
7
Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks.腰椎融合术后骶髂关节疼痛。一项麻醉阻滞研究。
Eur Spine J. 2005 Sep;14(7):654-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0692-6. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
8
Sacroiliac joint pain.骶髂关节疼痛。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):255-65. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200407000-00006.
9
Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: A validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests.诊断疼痛性骶髂关节:麦肯齐评估和骶髂关节激发试验的效度研究
Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60125-2.
10
Evaluation of the presence of sacroiliac joint region dysfunction using a combination of tests: a multicenter intertester reliability study.使用多种测试组合评估骶髂关节区域功能障碍的存在:一项多中心测试者间可靠性研究。
Phys Ther. 2002 Aug;82(8):772-81.