文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Patient Reported Outcomes from Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

作者信息

Kancherla Vamsi K, McGowan Shane M, Audley Brittany N, Sokunbi Gbolabo, Puccio Steven T

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

Temple/St. Luke's Medical School, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2017 Feb;11(1):120-126. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.120. Epub 2017 Feb 17.


DOI:10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.120
PMID:28243380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5326720/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, case series. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine morbidity, complications, and patient reported outcomes from minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Lumbar back pain emanating from the SIJ can be surgically treated via a percutaneous approach in the appropriately selected patient with minimal morbidity and acceptable functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed by >2 physical examination maneuvers and subjective relief from a computed tomography-guided lidocaine-bupivacaine-steroid injection underwent SIJ fusion after failing conservative management with a combination of oral anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, and pelvic belt stabilization. Perioperative data collected include estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time. Oswestry disability index, 12-item short form health survey (SF-12), visual analogue score, and functional status were analyzed. All complications were noted. RESULTS: The study cohort of 45 cases (69% female) achieved postoperative survey follow-up at 9.9 and 32.3 months. SF-12 physical component summary statistically improved while all other scores were equivalent. Mean EBL and operative time were 22 mL and 36 minutes, respectively. Initial survey showed that 64% of patients discontinued narcotics (29/45), 71% do not use an assistive device (32/45), and 15.6% do not work due to pain (7/45). 73% of patients stated they would have the surgery again (33/45). For the second survey, 65% of patients discontinued narcotics (26/40), 70% did not use an assistive device (28/40), and 17.5% did not work due to pain (7/40). A history of thoracolumbar instrumentation (16/45) did not significantly affect outcomes. Three complications described by screw malposition with neurologic deficit (6.7%) were treated with screw repositioning (1 case) and removal of a single superior implant (2 cases) with time to revision of 2.2 months. All three ultimately had resolution of radicular pain. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous SIJ fusion offers minimal morbidity and acceptable functional outcomes. While women and those with a prior history of lumbar instrumentation may be at increased risk of having SIJ dysfunction requiring surgical intervention, it was not found to affect postoperative functional outcomes when compared to the non-instrumented group.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Patient Reported Outcomes from Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Asian Spine J. 2017-2

[2]
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.

Neurosurg Focus. 2013-7

[3]
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

Pain Physician. 2017-9

[4]
Pain Relief Salvage with a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device in Patients with Previously Implanted Pain Devices and Therapies.

J Pain Res. 2021-9-2

[5]
Distraction arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint: 2-year results of a descriptive prospective multi-center cohort study in 171 patients.

Eur Spine J. 2018-1

[6]
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-4-20

[7]
A New Approach to the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain and First Patient-Reported Outcomes Using a Novel Arthrodesis Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Orthop Res Rev. 2024-2-1

[8]
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-8-23

[9]
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Eur Spine J. 2018-12-18

[10]
Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Neurosurg Focus. 2017-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Sacroiliac joint fusion: incidence, timing, and risk factors for contralateral fusion.

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025-4-30

[2]
Clinical outcome measures following lateral versus posterior sacroiliac joint fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Brain Spine. 2025-2-12

[3]
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Int Med Res. 2025-2

[4]
An Algorithmic Overview of Advanced Pain Therapies: A Narrative Review.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-1-27

[5]
Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review.

Turk J Med Sci. 2024-7-1

[6]
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.

J Pain Res. 2024-5-3

[7]
Interventional treatments for low back pain due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review of the literature.

Eur Spine J. 2024-4

[8]
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-12-26

[9]
Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022-12-28

[10]
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Int J Spine Surg. 2022-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-8-23

[2]
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.

Global Spine J. 2015-8-11

[3]
Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Spine J. 2016-6

[4]
Improvement in Health State Utility after Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Comparison to Normal Populations.

Global Spine J. 2015-6-25

[5]
Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-1-21

[6]
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study.

Int J Spine Surg. 2015-11-13

[7]
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015-12-18

[8]
Fusion of Multiple Segments Can Increase the Incidence of Sacroiliac Joint Pain After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016-6

[9]
Management of sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis with nonoperative care is medical resource-intensive and costly in a United States commercial payer population.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014-2-11

[10]
Nonoperative care to manage sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis: high costs and medical resource utilization in the United States Medicare population.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014-2-14

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索