Suppr超能文献

关于任何语言失语症测试开发的教程:关键的实质性和心理测量学考量

A tutorial on aphasia test development in any language: Key substantive and psychometric considerations.

作者信息

Ivanova Maria V, Hallowell Brooke

机构信息

Neurolinguistics Laboratory, Faculty of Philology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Ul. Myasnickaya, d. 20, Moscow, Russia, 101000.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2013 Jan 1;27(8):891-920. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2013.805728.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are a limited number of aphasia language tests in the majority of the world's commonly spoken languages. Furthermore, few aphasia tests in languages other than English have been standardized and normed, and few have supportive psychometric data pertaining to reliability and validity. The lack of standardized assessment tools across many of the world's languages poses serious challenges to clinical practice and research in aphasia.

AIMS

The current review addresses this lack of assessment tools by providing conceptual and statistical guidance for the development of aphasia assessment tools and establishment of their psychometric properties.

MAIN CONTRIBUTION

A list of aphasia tests in the 20 most widely spoken languages is included. The pitfalls of translating an existing test into a new language versus creating a new test are outlined. Factors to consider in determining test content are discussed. Further, a description of test items corresponding to different language functions is provided, with special emphasis on implementing important controls in test design. Next, a broad review of principal psychometric properties relevant to aphasia tests is presented, with specific statistical guidance for establishing psychometric properties of standardized assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

This article may be used to help guide future work on developing, standardizing and validating aphasia language tests. The considerations discussed are also applicable to the development of standardized tests of other cognitive functions.

摘要

背景

在世界上大多数通用语言中,失语症语言测试的数量有限。此外,除英语外,很少有失语症测试经过标准化和常模化,并且很少有关于可靠性和有效性的支持性心理测量数据。世界上许多语言缺乏标准化的评估工具,这给失语症的临床实践和研究带来了严峻挑战。

目的

本综述通过为失语症评估工具的开发及其心理测量特性的建立提供概念和统计指导,来解决评估工具缺乏的问题。

主要贡献

列出了20种使用最广泛的语言中的失语症测试。概述了将现有测试翻译成新语言与创建新测试的陷阱。讨论了确定测试内容时要考虑的因素。此外,还提供了与不同语言功能相对应的测试项目描述,特别强调在测试设计中实施重要的控制。接下来,对与失语症测试相关的主要心理测量特性进行了广泛综述,并为建立标准化评估工具的心理测量特性提供了具体的统计指导。

结论

本文可用于帮助指导未来开发、标准化和验证失语症语言测试的工作。所讨论的考虑因素也适用于其他认知功能标准化测试的开发。

相似文献

1
A tutorial on aphasia test development in any language: Key substantive and psychometric considerations.
Aphasiology. 2013 Jan 1;27(8):891-920. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2013.805728.
3
The Russian Aphasia Test: The first comprehensive, quantitative, standardized, and computerized aphasia language battery in Russian.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0258946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258946. eCollection 2021.
4
The Validity and Reliability of the Language Battery in Comprehensive Aphasia Test-Turkish (CAT-TR).
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):789-802. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09850-2. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of The Scenario Test UK for people with aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jul;53(4):748-760. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12379. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
6
Cross-linguistic adaptations of The Comprehensive Aphasia Test: Challenges and solutions.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(7-9):697-710. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1310299. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Assessing the Amount of Spontaneous Real-World Spoken Language in Aphasia: Validation of Two Methods.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 May 17;26(2):316-326. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0115.
10
Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Nov;53(6):1078-1093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12420. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of aphasia in linguistically diverse populations: current and future directions.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1612413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1612413. eCollection 2025.
3
The first aphasia screening test in Hungarian: A preliminary study on validity and diagnostic accuracy.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0290153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290153. eCollection 2023.
5
The Russian Aphasia Test: The first comprehensive, quantitative, standardized, and computerized aphasia language battery in Russian.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0258946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258946. eCollection 2021.
6
Aphasia in Multilingual Patients.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;21(11):60. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01148-5.
7
Advancing Neurolinguistics in Russia: Experience and Implications of Building Experimental Research and Evidence-Based Practices.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 3;12:702038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702038. eCollection 2021.
8
Aphasia-Diagnostic Challenges and Trends: Speech-Language Pathologist's Perspective.
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Sep-Oct;37(5):1461-1466. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.2314.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptualizing and Measuring Working Memory and its Relationship to Aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2012;26(3-4):258-278. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.604304. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
2
An introduction to item response theory and Rasch models for speech-language pathologists.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Aug;20(3):243-59. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0079). Epub 2011 May 26.
3
Validity of eye movement methods and indices for capturing semantic (associative) priming effects.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):31-48. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0100). Epub 2008 Aug 22.
4
Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia.
Semin Speech Lang. 2008 Aug;29(3):169-87; quiz C 3-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082882.
5
Bilingual aphasia: a theoretical and clinical review.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Aug;17(3):299-317. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/026).
6
Developing a clinician-friendly aphasia test.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Nov;16(4):295-315. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/035).
7
Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision.
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(19):2499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
10
Rasch modeling of revised token test performance: validity and sensitivity to change.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Feb;49(1):27-46. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/003).

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验