• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轴向腰椎椎间融合术:6 年单中心经验。

Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Bergman Clinics, Naarden and NedSpine, Ede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1063-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S49802. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

DOI:10.2147/CIA.S49802
PMID:23976846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3746784/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to report our 6-year single-center experience with L5-S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF).

METHODS

A total of 131 patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease refractory to nonsurgical treatment were treated with AxiaLIF at L5-S1, and were followed for a minimum of 1 year (mean: 21 months). Main outcomes included back and leg pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index score, working status, analgesic medication use, patient satisfaction, and complications. Computed tomography was used to determine postoperative fusion status.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications, including vascular, neural, urologic, or bowel injuries, were reported. Back and leg pain severity decreased by 51% and 42%, respectively, during the follow-up period (both P < 0.001). Back function scores improved 50% compared to baseline. Clinical success, defined as improvement ≥30%, was 67% for back pain severity, 65% for leg pain severity, and 71% for back function. The employment rate increased from 47% before surgery to 64% at final follow-up (P < 0.001). Less than one in four patients regularly used analgesic medications postsurgery. Patient satisfaction with the AxiaLIF procedure was 83%. The fusion rate was 87.8% at final follow-up. During follow-up, 17 (13.0%) patients underwent 18 reoperations on the lumbar spine, including pedicle screw fixation (n = 10), total disc replacement of an uninvolved level (n = 3), facet screw fixation (n = 3), facet screw removal (n = 1), and interbody fusion at L4-L5 (n = 1). Eight (6.1%) reoperations were at the index level.

CONCLUSION

Single-level AxiaLIF is a safe and effective means to achieve lumbosacral fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在报告我们在 L5-S1 轴向腰椎体间融合术(AxiaLIF)方面的 6 年单中心经验。

方法

共 131 例症状性退行性椎间盘疾病患者经非手术治疗无效,在 L5-S1 处接受 AxiaLIF 治疗,并至少随访 1 年(平均 21 个月)。主要结果包括腰背疼痛严重程度、Oswestry 功能障碍指数评分、工作状态、镇痛药物使用、患者满意度和并发症。采用计算机断层扫描确定术后融合状态。

结果

无术中并发症,包括血管、神经、泌尿科或肠道损伤。随访期间腰背疼痛严重程度分别下降 51%和 42%(均 P < 0.001)。与基线相比,腰背功能评分提高了 50%。临床成功率定义为改善≥30%,腰背疼痛严重程度为 67%,下肢疼痛严重程度为 65%,腰背功能为 71%。手术前的就业率为 47%,最后随访时为 64%(P < 0.001)。术后不到四分之一的患者定期使用镇痛药。AxiaLIF 手术的患者满意度为 83%。最后随访时融合率为 87.8%。随访期间,17 例(13.0%)患者接受了 18 次腰椎再手术,包括椎弓根螺钉固定术(n = 10)、未受累节段全椎间盘置换术(n = 3)、关节突螺钉固定术(n = 3)、关节突螺钉去除术(n = 1)和 L4-L5 椎间融合术(n = 1)。8 例(6.1%)再手术在指数水平。

结论

单节段 AxiaLIF 是治疗症状性退行性椎间盘疾病患者腰骶融合的一种安全有效的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/3d7641c4e9ae/cia-8-1063Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/72ecc316d399/cia-8-1063Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/a86de365b824/cia-8-1063Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/3d7641c4e9ae/cia-8-1063Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/72ecc316d399/cia-8-1063Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/a86de365b824/cia-8-1063Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/3746784/3d7641c4e9ae/cia-8-1063Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience.轴向腰椎椎间融合术:6 年单中心经验。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1063-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S49802. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.L5-S1节段经皮轴向腰椎椎间融合术(AxiaLIF):初步临床及影像学经验
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;51(4):225-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080915.
3
Clinical and radiographic outcomes with L4-S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and posterior instrumentation: a multicenter study.L4-S1 节段腰椎轴向椎间融合术(AxiaLIF)联合后路内固定的临床及影像学结果:一项多中心研究
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 Sep 18;6:155-61. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S48442. eCollection 2013.
4
Results and complications after 2-level axial lumbar interbody fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up.2 水平轴向腰椎体间融合术后 2 年随访的结果和并发症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Sep;17(3):187-92. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.SPINE11915. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
6
Minimally invasive axial presacral L5-S1 interbody fusion: two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.微创轴向经骶前路 L5-S1 椎体间融合术:两年临床和影像学结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1296-301. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821b3e37.
7
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.胸腰段冠状面弯曲顶点多级外侧椎间融合术在成人脊柱畸形手术中联合开放后路内固定及L5-S1椎间融合的效用:32例病例匹配评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1.微创手术经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后手术节段对患者报告的临床结局的影响:L4-L5 与 L5-S1。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;81(1):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.082. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
9
Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.双侧植入低轮廓椎间融合器:下沉、前凸及融合分析。
Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1.
10
Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.微创外侧椎间融合术治疗无附加椎弓根螺钉固定的上位相邻节段腰椎退变性狭窄症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):861-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13841. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Axial Lumber Interbody Fusion as an Alternative "Salvage" Approach to Lumbosacral Fixation: A Case Series.轴向腰椎椎间融合术作为腰骶部固定的一种替代性“挽救”方法:病例系列
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(3):288-295. doi: 10.14444/8728.
2
Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion.尾骨旁经骶骨入路:一种用于腰骶部轴向椎间融合的罕见入路。
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021 Jan 12;5(4):223-231. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179. eCollection 2021.
3
Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications with axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion: A 5-year postmarketing surveillance experience.腰骶部前路椎间融合术的并发症:5年上市后监测经验
SAS J. 2011 Sep 1;5(3):90-4. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.03.002. eCollection 2011.
2
Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up.经骶前腹膜后入路行腰椎轴向椎间融合术:一种用于L5-S1节段的新型微创技术:50例患者1年随访的临床结果、并发症及融合率
SAS J. 2010 Jun 1;4(2):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003. eCollection 2010.
3
全椎间盘置换手术术前模板的验证
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):84-91. doi: 10.14444/6011. eCollection 2019 Jan.
4
A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.一项关于采用微创和开放手术技术进行腰椎融合术后恢复工作时间和麻醉药物使用情况的系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2398-6.
5
Minimally invasive transaxial lumbosacral interbody fusion: a ten year single-centre experience.微创经轴腰骶椎间融合术:十年单中心经验
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3273-5. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
Lumbar spine fusion for chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
腰椎融合术治疗退行性椎间盘疾病引起的慢性下腰痛:系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):E409-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182877f11.
4
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies.微创手术与开放脊柱融合术治疗退行性腰椎病变的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jun;19(6):829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.10.004. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
5
Retrospective analysis of L5-S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF): a comparison with and without the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.回顾性分析 L5-S1 轴向腰椎间融合术(AxiaLIF):与使用和不使用重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2 的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Nov;11(11):1027-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.10.006.
6
MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation.磁共振成像评估腰椎间盘退变和年龄相关性变化:表观扩散系数与 T2 定量。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1617-23. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2556. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
7
The presacral retroperitoneal approach for axial lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study of clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates at a follow-up of two years in 26 patients.经骶前腹膜后入路行腰椎轴向椎间融合术:26例患者两年随访期内临床疗效、并发症及融合率的前瞻性研究
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):955-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B7.25188.
8
Complications of axial lumbar interbody fusion.轴向腰椎椎间融合术的并发症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Sep;15(3):273-9. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10373. Epub 2011 May 20.
9
"Minimally invasive" lumbar spine surgery: a critical review.微创腰椎手术:批判性评价。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jul;153(7):1455-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1023-4. Epub 2011 May 1.
10
Minimally invasive axial presacral L5-S1 interbody fusion: two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.微创轴向经骶前路 L5-S1 椎体间融合术:两年临床和影像学结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1296-301. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821b3e37.