Suppr超能文献

文库制备对 RNA-Seq 数据下游分析和解释的影响:Illumina PolyA 和 NuGEN Ovation 方案的比较。

Impact of library preparation on downstream analysis and interpretation of RNA-Seq data: comparison between Illumina PolyA and NuGEN Ovation protocol.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071745. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The sequencing by the PolyA selection is the most common approach for library preparation. With limited amount or degraded RNA, alternative protocols such as the NuGEN have been developed. However, it is not yet clear how the different library preparations affect the downstream analyses of the broad applications of RNA sequencing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eight human mammary epithelial cell (HMEC) lines with high quality RNA were sequenced by Illumina's mRNA-Seq PolyA selection and NuGEN ENCORE library preparation. The following analyses and comparisons were conducted: 1) the numbers of genes captured by each protocol; 2) the impact of protocols on differentially expressed gene detection between biological replicates; 3) expressed single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection; 4) non-coding RNAs, particularly lincRNA detection; and 5) intragenic gene expression.

RESULTS

Sequences from the NuGEN protocol had lower (75%) alignment rate than the PolyA (over 90%). The NuGEN protocol detected fewer genes (12-20% less) with a significant portion of reads mapped to non-coding regions. A large number of genes were differentially detected between the two protocols. About 17-20% of the differentially expressed genes between biological replicates were commonly detected between the two protocols. Significantly higher numbers of SNVs (5-6 times) were detected in the NuGEN samples, which were largely from intragenic and intergenic regions. The NuGEN captured fewer exons (25% less) and had higher base level coverage variance. While 6.3% of reads were mapped to intragenic regions in the PolyA samples, the percentages were much higher (20-25%) for the NuGEN samples. The NuGEN protocol did not detect more known non-coding RNAs such as lincRNAs, but targeted small and "novel" lincRNAs.

CONCLUSION

Different library preparations can have significant impacts on downstream analysis and interpretation of RNA-seq data. The NuGEN provides an alternative for limited or degraded RNA but it has limitations for some RNA-seq applications.

摘要

目的

多聚 A 选择测序是最常用的文库制备方法。对于有限量或降解的 RNA,已经开发了替代方案,如 NuGEN。然而,不同的文库制备方法如何影响 RNA 测序的广泛应用的下游分析尚不清楚。

方法和材料

用 Illumina 的 mRNA-Seq 多聚 A 选择和 NuGEN ENCORE 文库制备对 8 个人类乳腺上皮细胞 (HMEC) 系进行测序。进行了以下分析和比较:1) 每种方案捕获的基因数量;2) 方案对生物重复之间差异表达基因检测的影响;3) 表达单核苷酸变异 (SNV) 的检测;4) 非编码 RNA,特别是 lincRNA 的检测;和 5) 基因内基因表达。

结果

NuGEN 方案的序列比对率较低 (75%),而多聚 A 方案的比对率超过 90%。NuGEN 方案检测到的基因较少 (少 12-20%),大部分reads 映射到非编码区。两种方案之间检测到大量差异表达基因。两种方案之间检测到的生物重复之间的差异表达基因中约有 17-20%是共同检测到的。在 NuGEN 样本中检测到的 SNV 数量显著增加 (5-6 倍),主要来自基因内和基因间区。NuGEN 捕获的外显子较少 (少 25%),并且碱基水平覆盖度变化较大。在 PolyA 样本中,有 6.3%的reads 映射到基因内区,而在 NuGEN 样本中,这一比例要高得多 (20-25%)。NuGEN 方案没有检测到更多已知的非编码 RNA,如 lincRNA,但针对小的和“新”的 lincRNA。

结论

不同的文库制备方法会对 RNA-seq 数据的下游分析和解释产生重大影响。NuGEN 为有限量或降解的 RNA 提供了一种替代方案,但它在某些 RNA-seq 应用中存在局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc27/3747248/92f1ea5fdfa0/pone.0071745.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验