Laboratório de Pesquisas em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz and Centro de Pesquisa Diagnóstico e Treinamento em Malária, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY, USA.
Med Hypotheses. 2013 Nov;81(5):777-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Despite the abundance of information on cerebral malaria (CM), the pathogenesis of this disease is not completely understood. At present, two nonexclusive dominant hypotheses exist to explain how the neurological syndrome manifests: the sequestration (or mechanical) hypothesis and the inflammatory hypothesis. The sequestration hypothesis states that sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized red blood cells (pRBCs) to brain capillary endothelia causes obstruction of capillary blood flow followed by brain tissue anoxia and coma. The inflammatory hypothesis postulates that P. falciparum infection releases toxic molecules in the circulation, inducing an imbalanced systemic inflammatory response that leads to coagulopathy, brain endothelial cell dysfunction, accumulation of leukocytes in the brain microcirculation, blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage, cerebral vasoconstriction, edema, and coma. However, both hypotheses, even when considered together, are not sufficient to fully explain the pathogenesis of CM. Here, we propose that the development of acute liver failure (ALF) together with BBB breakdown are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the genesis of CM. ALF is characterized by coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in a patient without pre-existing liver disease. Signs of hepatic dysfunction have been shown to occur in 2.5-40% of CM patients. In addition, recent studies with murine models demonstrated that mice presenting experimental cerebral malaria (ECM) had hepatic damage and brain metabolic changes characteristic of HE. However, the occurrence of CM in patients with mild or without apparent hepatocellular liver damage and the presence of liver damage in non-CM murine models indicate that the development of ALF during malaria infection is not the single factor responsible for neuropathology. To solve this problem, we also propose that BBB breakdown contributes to the pathogenesis of CM and synergizes with hepatic failure to cause neurological signs and symptoms. BBB dysfunction would thus occur in CM by a mechanism similar to the one occurring in sepsis and is in agreement with the inflammatory hypothesis. Nevertheless, differently from in the inflammatory hypothesis, BBB leakage would facilitate the penetration of ammonia and other toxins into the brain parenchyma, but would not be sufficient to cause CM when occurring alone. We believe our hypothesis better explains the pathogenesis of CM, does not have problems to deal with the exception data not explained by the previous hypotheses, and reveals new targets for adjunctive therapy.
尽管关于脑型疟疾 (CM) 的信息很多,但该疾病的发病机制尚不完全清楚。目前,有两个非排他性的主导假说可以解释神经综合征的表现方式:隔离(或机械)假说和炎症假说。隔离假说认为,恶性疟原虫寄生的红细胞(pRBC)与脑毛细血管内皮的隔离导致毛细血管血流阻塞,随后导致脑组织缺氧和昏迷。炎症假说假设,恶性疟原虫感染会在循环中释放有毒分子,诱导失衡的全身炎症反应,导致凝血功能障碍、脑内皮细胞功能障碍、白细胞在脑微循环中积聚、血脑屏障(BBB)渗漏、脑血管收缩、水肿和昏迷。然而,即使将这两个假说结合起来,也不足以完全解释 CM 的发病机制。在这里,我们提出急性肝衰竭(ALF)的发展以及 BBB 破裂是 CM 发生的必要和充分条件。ALF 表现为无潜在肝病的患者发生凝血功能障碍和肝性脑病(HE)。已有研究表明,2.5-40%的 CM 患者存在肝功能异常的迹象。此外,最近的小鼠模型研究表明,患有实验性脑疟疾(ECM)的小鼠存在肝损伤和脑代谢变化,具有 HE 的特征。然而,在轻度或无明显肝细胞损伤的 CM 患者中发生 CM 以及在非 CM 小鼠模型中存在肝损伤表明,在疟疾感染期间发生 ALF 并不是导致神经病理学的唯一因素。为了解决这个问题,我们还提出 BBB 破裂有助于 CM 的发病机制,并与肝衰竭协同作用导致神经症状和体征。因此,在 CM 中,BBB 功能障碍将通过类似于发生在脓毒症中的机制发生,并且与炎症假说一致。然而,与炎症假说不同的是,BBB 渗漏会使氨和其他毒素更容易渗透到脑组织中,但单独发生时不足以导致 CM。我们相信,我们的假说更好地解释了 CM 的发病机制,不存在无法处理前两个假说无法解释的异常数据的问题,并且揭示了辅助治疗的新靶点。