Suppr超能文献

ADHD 与学习障碍在既往晚期早产儿中的表现:基于人群的出生队列研究。

ADHD and learning disabilities in former late preterm infants: a population-based birth cohort.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e630-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3588. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Previous studies suggest that former late preterm infants are at increased risk for learning and behavioral problems compared with term infants. These studies have primarily used referred clinical samples of children followed only until early school age. Our objective was to determine the cumulative incidence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and learning disabilities (LD) in former late preterm versus term infants in a population-based birth cohort.

METHODS

Subjects included all children born 1976 to 1982 in Rochester, MN who remained in the community after 5 years. This study focused on the comparison of subjects in 2 subgroups, late preterm (34 to <37 weeks) and term (37 to <42 weeks). School and medical records were available to identify individuals who met research criteria for ADHD and LD in reading, written language, and math. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of each condition by 19 years of age. Cox models were fit to evaluate the association between gestational age group and condition, after adjusting for maternal education and perinatal complications.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences in the cumulative incidence of ADHD or LD between the late preterm (N = 256) versus term (N = 4419) groups: ADHD (cumulative incidence by age 19 years, 7.7% vs 7.2%; P = .84); reading LD (14.2% vs 13.1%; P = .57); written language LD (13.5% vs 15.7%; P = .36), and math LD (16.1% vs 15.5%; P = .89).

CONCLUSIONS

These data from a population-based birth cohort indicate that former late preterm infants have similar rates of LD and ADHD as term infants.

摘要

背景与目的

先前的研究表明,与足月婴儿相比,前晚期早产儿在学习和行为问题方面的风险增加。这些研究主要使用了接受过临床转诊的儿童样本,这些儿童仅在早期学龄时接受了随访。我们的目的是在一个基于人群的出生队列中,确定前晚期早产儿与足月婴儿相比,注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和学习障碍(LD)的累积发病率。

方法

研究对象包括 1976 年至 1982 年在明尼苏达州罗切斯特出生并在 5 岁后仍留在社区的所有儿童。本研究重点比较了 2 个亚组的受试者,晚期早产儿(34 至<37 周)和足月(37 至<42 周)。学校和医疗记录可用于确定符合 ADHD 和阅读、书面语言和数学 LD 研究标准的个体。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计到 19 岁时每种情况的累积发病率。Cox 模型用于在调整了母亲教育和围产期并发症后,评估胎龄组与疾病之间的关联。

结果

我们发现晚期早产儿(N=256)与足月(N=4419)组之间 ADHD 或 LD 的累积发病率没有统计学上的显著差异:ADHD(19 岁时的累积发病率,7.7%对 7.2%;P=0.84);阅读 LD(14.2%对 13.1%;P=0.57);书面语言 LD(13.5%对 15.7%;P=0.36)和数学 LD(16.1%对 15.5%;P=0.89)。

结论

本基于人群的出生队列研究数据表明,前晚期早产儿的 LD 和 ADHD 发生率与足月婴儿相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Late preterm infants - Changing trends and continuing challenges.晚期早产儿——不断变化的趋势与持续存在的挑战。
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020 Mar;7(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term cognitive outcomes of infants born moderately and late preterm.中晚期早产儿的长期认知结局。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Aug;54(8):704-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04315.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Longitudinal cognitive assessment in healthy late preterm infants.健康晚期早产儿的纵向认知评估。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012 May;16(3):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
6
A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm.一项关于晚期早产儿严重发病率的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):374.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验