致欧盟委员会的公开信：毫无科学依据的预防措施推动了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、既定科学，也有悖于风险评估原则。 - Suppr

Open letter to the European Commission: scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science, and risk assessment principles.

作者信息

Dietrich Daniel, von Aulock Sonja, Marquardt H W J, Blaauboer Bas J, Dekant Wolfgang, Kehrer James, Hengstler Jan G, Collier Abby C, Gori Gio Batta, Pelkonen Olavi, Lang Florian, Nijkamp Frans P, Stemmer Kerstin, Li Albert, Savolainen Kai, Hayes A Wallace, Gooderham Nigel, Harvey Alan

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2013 Sep;87(9):1739-41. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1117-2. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-013-1117-2

PMID:23979651

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Open letter to the European Commission: scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science, and risk assessment principles.致欧盟委员会的公开信：毫无科学依据的预防措施推动了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、既定科学，也有悖于风险评估原则。

Arch Toxicol. 2013 Sep;87(9):1739-41. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1117-2. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施驱动着欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、既定科学，也有悖于风险评估原则。

Toxicol In Vitro. 2013 Oct;27(7):2110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施主导了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、成熟的科学，也违背风险评估原则。

Toxicol Lett. 2013 Nov 25;223(2):A1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施主导了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、既定科学，也违反风险评估原则。

Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Dec;62:A1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施主导了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识，又无视既定科学和风险评估原则。

Chem Biol Interact. 2013 Sep 5;205(1):A1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施主导了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、既定科学，也有悖于风险评估原则。

Toxicon. 2013 Dec 15;76:A1-A2.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施主导了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、成熟的科学，也违背风险评估原则。

ALTEX. 2013;30(3):381-5. doi: 10.14573/altex.2013.3.381.

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.毫无科学依据的预防措施主导了欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰物监管的建议，这既违背常识、成熟的科学和风险评估原则。

Toxicon. 2013 Dec 15;76:A1-A2. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

Risk assessment of 'endocrine substances': guidance on identifying endocrine disruptors.“内分泌干扰物”风险评估：鉴定内分泌干扰物的指南。

Toxicol Lett. 2013 Dec 16;223(3):287-90. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Regulation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: critical overview and deficiencies in toxicology and risk assessment for human health.内分泌干扰化学物质的监管：对人类健康毒理学和风险评估的批判性概述与不足

Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Mar;20(1):145-65. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2005.09.008.

引用本文的文献

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?与具有更高或相当内分泌活性的天然化合物相比，人类接触合成内分泌干扰化学品（S-EDCs）通常可以忽略不计：如何评估 S-EDCs 的风险？

Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jul;94(7):2549-2557. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02800-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

Endocrine disrupting chemicals: Impact on human health, wildlife and the environment.内分泌干扰化学物质：对人类健康、野生生物和环境的影响。

Sci Prog. 2019 Mar;102(1):3-42. doi: 10.1177/0036850419826802. Epub 2019 Jan 1.

Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than 'sound science', should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals.应该使用经过同行评审且无偏见的研究，而非“合理科学”，来评估内分泌干扰化学物质。

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Nov;70(11):1051-1056. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207841. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Methodological issues in human studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals.内分泌干扰化学物质人体研究中的方法学问题。

Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015 Dec;16(4):289-97. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9340-9.

A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals.关于内分泌干扰化学物质对健康影响的争论中的前进之路。

Environ Health. 2014 Dec 22;13:118. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-118.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Open letter to the European Commission: scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science, and risk assessment principles.

作者信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献