Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Nov;57(11):5767-70. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01032-13. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
We compared the ability of the EUCAST EDef 7.2 and the Etest to detect the susceptibility to micafungin of 160 Candida and non-Candida clinical isolates. Agreement was higher when Etest MICs were obtained after 24 h of incubation; essential agreement was 90%, and categorical agreement was >90%. False susceptibility was seen only for Candida krusei (10%), and false resistance was observed in 6% of the isolates, ranging from 2.6% (C. glabrata) to 13% (C. albicans).
我们比较了 EUCAST EDef 7.2 和 Etest 检测 160 株念珠菌和非念珠菌临床分离株对米卡芬净敏感性的能力。孵育 24 小时后获得的 Etest MIC 时,一致性更高;基本一致率为 90%,分类一致率>90%。仅对克柔念珠菌(10%)出现假敏感性,6%的分离株出现假耐药性,范围为 2.6%(近平滑念珠菌)至 13%(白色念珠菌)。