Tsirogianni Stavroula, Sammut Gordon
Methodology Department, London School of Economics, London, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Sep;53(3):541-56. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12047. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
Since its inception, psychology has struggled with issues of conceptualization and operationalization of social-psychological phenomena. The study of social values and points of view has been prone to such difficulties, despite a predominant concern of qualitative distinctions in the variability of both of these phenomena across different individuals and social groups. And while interest in both traces a common origin in Rokeach's studies of narrow mindedness, the study of both phenomena has since proceeded apace. In this study, we posit a renewed reconciliation between the two that is best served through a social-psychological model of points of view in terms of the values that inspire them. We draw on critical linguistics to propose a theoretical and methodological framework that can aid a systematic study of value structures as they take different forms and meanings through particular types of points of view. In five stages of qualitative analysis, the model deconstructs utterances into distinct terms that reveal a predominant perspective-taking style that can be utilized towards the categorization of different points of view, in terms of values that imbue them and that serve to provide them with a coherent angle of constructing a particular narrative.
自心理学诞生以来，它一直在努力解决社会心理现象的概念化和操作化问题。尽管人们主要关注这两种现象在不同个体和社会群体中的变异性方面的质性差异，但对社会价值观和观点的研究一直容易出现此类困难。虽然对这两者的兴趣都源于罗基奇对狭隘观念的研究，但此后对这两种现象的研究都在迅速发展。在本研究中，我们假定通过一种基于激发观点的价值观的社会心理观点模型，可以使两者重新达成和解。我们借鉴批判性语言学，提出一个理论和方法框架，该框架有助于系统地研究价值结构，因为它们通过特定类型的观点呈现出不同的形式和意义。在定性分析的五个阶段中，该模型将话语解构为不同的术语，这些术语揭示了一种占主导地位的视角采取风格，可用于根据赋予不同观点的价值观对其进行分类，这些价值观为构建特定叙事提供了连贯的角度。
