Anjarwati Rosi, Setiawan Slamet, Laksono Kisyani
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, STKIP PGRI Jombang, Indonesia.
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia.
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):e06909. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06909. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Meaning-making choice place a significant position in written communication, as indirect contact needs a particular strategy to achieve the objective. This case study explores how female and male writers utilized their meaning-making choice through experiential meaning in their introduction part of journal article writing published in JEELL. Research articles written by five female writers and five male writers with English teachers' professional backgrounds are involved in this study. The results indicate that both female and male writers tend to use a particular process, such as material processes, to represent their real-world experiences of and . However, it is also found that there is a difference in the technique used in expressing material processes by female and male writers. The study also implies that male writers apply more verbal processes than female writers in citing or synthesizing sources. Furthermore, the investigations reveal that male writers produced more various type of mental processes than female writers.
意义构建选择在书面交流中占据重要地位，因为间接接触需要特定策略来实现目标。本案例研究探讨了男性和女性作家如何在发表于《英语教育学报》（JEELL）的期刊文章引言部分，通过经验意义运用他们的意义构建选择。本研究涉及五位具有英语教师专业背景的女性作家和五位男性作家所撰写的研究文章。结果表明，男性和女性作家都倾向于使用特定过程，如物质过程，来呈现他们在……方面的现实世界经历。然而，研究还发现，男性和女性作家在表达物质过程时所使用的技巧存在差异。该研究还表明，在引用或综合资料来源方面，男性作家比女性作家运用更多言语过程。此外，调查显示男性作家产生的心理过程类型比女性作家更多样。
