Duyme M
Laboratoire Génétique, Neurogénétique et Comportement, CNRS URA 1294, Université Paris, France.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;31(5):699-710. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1990.tb00811.x.
The higher rate of antisocial behaviour in children from lower class environments has been hypothesized as arising from (a) genetic social class differences and/or (b) cultural/environmental disadvantages. The present study aims to evaluate the strength of the incidence of social class on adolescent antisocial behaviour. To separate genetic factors and the prenatal environment from postnatal rearing conditions, 77 children relinquished at birth and adopted before the age of 3 were studied. Using the Rutter "Children's Behaviour Questionnaire for Completion by Teachers", eight antisocial behaviours were assessed when subjects were in late adolescence. With the exception of theft and bullying, results indicate that the higher the adoptive parental social class, the lower the antisocial behaviour rates in the adoptees. It is shown that the relationship between the total score of adoptees' antisocial behaviour and social class cannot be attributed exclusively to a concentration of these behaviours in the lowest class. No significant selective placement was observed. Concordances and discrepancies with previous studies are discussed.
来自下层社会环境的儿童反社会行为发生率较高，这被假设为源于（a）遗传社会阶层差异和/或（b）文化/环境劣势。本研究旨在评估社会阶层对青少年反社会行为发生率的影响强度。为了将遗传因素和产前环境与产后养育条件区分开来，对77名出生时被遗弃并在3岁前被收养的儿童进行了研究。使用拉特“教师填写的儿童行为问卷”，在受试者接近青春期时评估了八种反社会行为。除了盗窃和欺凌外，结果表明，收养父母的社会阶层越高，被收养者的反社会行为率越低。研究表明，被收养者反社会行为总分与社会阶层之间的关系不能仅仅归因于这些行为在最低阶层的集中。未观察到明显的选择性安置。讨论了与先前研究的一致性和差异。
