Department of Surgery, Obesity Center Amsterdam, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1899-914. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1058-0.
The adjustable gastric band (L)AGB gained popularity as a weight loss procedure. However, long-term results are disappointing; many patients need revision to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The purpose of this study was to assess morbidity, mortality, and results of these two revisional procedures. Fifteen LRYGB studies with a total of 588 patients and eight LSG studies with 286 patients were included. The reason for revision was insufficient weight loss or weight regain in 62.2 and 63.9% in LRYGB and LSG patients. Short-term complications occurred in 8.5 and 15.7% and long-term complications in 8.9 and 2.5%. Reoperation was performed in 6.5 and 3.5%. Revision to LRYGB or LSG after (L)AGB is feasible and relatively safe. Complication rate is higher than in primary procedures.
可调胃束带(LAGB)作为一种减肥手术广受欢迎。然而,长期结果令人失望;许多患者需要进行腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)或袖状胃切除术(LSG)的修正。本研究旨在评估这两种修正手术的发病率、死亡率和结果。共纳入 15 项 LRYGB 研究,共 588 例患者,8 项 LSG 研究,共 286 例患者。修正的原因是 LRYGB 和 LSG 患者的体重减轻或体重反弹不足,分别为 62.2%和 63.9%。短期并发症发生率分别为 8.5%和 15.7%,长期并发症发生率分别为 8.9%和 2.5%。再次手术分别为 6.5%和 3.5%。(L)AGB 修正后的 LRYGB 或 LSG 是可行且相对安全的。并发症发生率高于初次手术。