From the Neuroimmunology Unit (L.P.-J., M.B., M.G., S.S., G.C., G.M.) and Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), DIBIT-II, San Raffaele Scientific Institute (M.C., M.C., L.T., G.C., L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; and Dulbecco Telethon Institute, Biomolecular NMR Laboratory c/o Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (E.G., S.M., G.M.).
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3166-74. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001687. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcranial direct current stimulation is emerging as a promising tool for the treatment of several neurological conditions, including cerebral ischemia. The therapeutic role of this noninvasive treatment is, however, limited to chronic phases of stroke. We thus ought to investigate whether different stimulation protocols could also be beneficial in the acute phase of experimental brain ischemia. METHODS: The influence of both cathodal and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in modifying brain metabolism of healthy mice was first tested by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Then, mice undergoing transient proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion were randomized and treated acutely with anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain metabolism, functional outcomes, and ischemic lesion volume, as well as the inflammatory reaction and blood brain barrier functionality, were analyzed. RESULTS: Cathodal stimulation was able, if applied in the acute phase of stroke, to preserve cortical neurons from the ischemic damage, to reduce inflammation, and to promote a better clinical recovery compared with sham and anodal treatments. This finding was attributable to the significant decrease of cortical glutamate, as indicated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Conversely, anodal stimulation induced an increase in the postischemic lesion volume and augmented blood brain barrier derangement. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that transcranial direct current stimulation exerts a measurable neuroprotective effect in the acute phase of stroke. However, its timing and polarity should be carefully identified on the base of the pathophysiological context to avoid potential harmful side effects.
背景与目的:经颅直流电刺激作为一种有前途的治疗多种神经疾病的手段,包括脑缺血,正逐渐兴起。然而,这种非侵入性治疗的治疗作用仅限于中风的慢性阶段。因此,我们应该研究不同的刺激方案是否也能对实验性脑缺血的急性期有益。
方法:首先通过磁共振波谱法测试了阴极和阳极经颅直流电刺激对健康小鼠脑代谢的影响。然后,对经历短暂的大脑中动脉近端闭塞的小鼠进行随机分组,并在急性阶段接受阳极、阴极或假经颅直流电刺激治疗。分析脑代谢、功能结果和缺血性损伤体积,以及炎症反应和血脑屏障功能。
结果:如果在中风的急性期应用,阴极刺激能够保护皮质神经元免受缺血损伤,减少炎症,并与假刺激和阳极刺激相比促进更好的临床恢复。这一发现归因于磁共振波谱法显示的皮质谷氨酸的显著减少。相反,阳极刺激会增加缺血后损伤体积,并加剧血脑屏障紊乱。
结论:我们的数据表明,经颅直流电刺激在中风的急性期具有可测量的神经保护作用。然而,应根据病理生理情况仔细确定其时间和极性,以避免潜在的有害副作用。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013-4-22
BMC Neurosci. 2020-5-12
Front Neurol. 2025-5-14