• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有烟必有火:美国吸烟政策对火灾发生率的影响。

Where there's smoking, there's fire: the effects of smoking policies on the incidence of fires in the USA.

作者信息

Markowitz Sara

机构信息

Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2014 Nov;23(11):1353-73. doi: 10.1002/hec.2990. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1002/hec.2990
PMID:23983040
Abstract

Fires and burns are among the leading causes of unintentional death in the USA. Most of these deaths occur in residences, and cigarettes are a primary cause. In this paper, I explore the relationship between smoking, cigarette policies, and fires. As smoking rates decline, there are fewer opportunities for fires; however, the magnitude of any reduction is in question. Using a state-level panel, I find that increases in cigarette prices are associated with fewer residential fires and deaths. However, laws regulating indoor smoking are associated with more fires; in particular, restaurant and bar smoking bans are associated with an increase in fires at eating and drinking establishments. This increase is important given the growing popularity of smoking bans in the USA and around the world. As workplaces, schools, and businesses ban smoking and remove ashtrays, smokers who continue to smoke are left without safe options for disposal of cigarettes, leading to more opportunities for fires to start.

摘要

火灾和烧伤是美国意外死亡的主要原因之一。这些死亡大多发生在住宅中,香烟是主要原因。在本文中,我探讨了吸烟、香烟政策与火灾之间的关系。随着吸烟率下降,火灾发生的机会减少;然而,减少的幅度尚不确定。利用州级面板数据,我发现香烟价格上涨与住宅火灾和死亡人数减少有关。然而,规范室内吸烟的法律却与更多火灾相关;特别是,餐厅和酒吧禁烟令与餐饮场所火灾增加有关。鉴于美国和全球范围内禁烟令越来越普遍,这一增长值得关注。随着工作场所、学校和企业禁止吸烟并移除烟灰缸,继续吸烟的人没有安全的香烟处理方式,从而导致更多火灾发生的机会。

相似文献

1
Where there's smoking, there's fire: the effects of smoking policies on the incidence of fires in the USA.有烟必有火:美国吸烟政策对火灾发生率的影响。
Health Econ. 2014 Nov;23(11):1353-73. doi: 10.1002/hec.2990. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
Exploring Impacts of Taxes and Hospitality Bans on Cigarette Prices and Smoking Prevalence Using a Large Dataset of Cigarette Prices at Stores 2001-2011, USA.利用2001年至2011年美国商店香烟价格的大型数据集,探究税收和酒店禁令对香烟价格及吸烟流行率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;14(3):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030318.
3
Longitudinal Associations of Local Cigarette Prices and Smoking Bans with Smoking Behavior in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.多民族动脉粥样硬化研究中局部香烟价格和禁烟令与吸烟行为的纵向关联。
Epidemiology. 2017 Nov;28(6):863-871. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000736.
4
Fire injuries, disasters, and costs from cigarettes and cigarette lights: a global overview.火灾伤害、灾难以及香烟和烟头造成的损失:全球概览。
Prev Med. 2000 Aug;31(2 Pt 1):91-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0680.
5
The impact of state fire safe cigarette policies on fire fatalities, injuries, and incidents.州级防火香烟政策对火灾死亡、受伤及事故的影响。
J Emerg Manag. 2017 Nov/Dec;15(6):379-389. doi: 10.5055/jem.2017.0346.
6
Are fire safe cigarettes actually fire safe? Evidence from changes in US state laws.安全香烟真的安全吗?来自美国州法律变化的证据。
Inj Prev. 2018 Jun;24(3):193-198. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042322. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Investigating the effect of banning non-reduced ignition propensity cigarettes on fatal residential fires in Sweden.调查禁止非低点燃倾向香烟对瑞典住宅致命火灾的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Apr;26(2):334-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv180. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
Snuffing out cigarette sales and the smoking deaths epidemic.杜绝香烟销售与吸烟致死的流行趋势。
N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 15;120(1256):U2587.
9
Tobacco control policy and smoking among older Americans: An analysis of a nationally-representative longitudinal sample (1992-2014).美国老年人的烟草控制政策与吸烟情况:对一个具有全国代表性的纵向样本(1992 - 2014年)的分析
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106127. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106127. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Recent trends in home and work smoking bans.家庭和工作场所禁烟的最新趋势。
Tob Control. 2004 Sep;13(3):258-63. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006056.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of neighborhood Area Deprivation Index on residential burn injury severity.邻里剥夺指数对居民烧伤严重程度的影响。
Burns. 2021 Mar;47(2):447-454. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017.明尼苏达州 1998-2017 年烟草价格和烟草控制支出增加对 20 年的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0230364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230364. eCollection 2020.