• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用2001年至2011年美国商店香烟价格的大型数据集,探究税收和酒店禁令对香烟价格及吸烟流行率的影响。

Exploring Impacts of Taxes and Hospitality Bans on Cigarette Prices and Smoking Prevalence Using a Large Dataset of Cigarette Prices at Stores 2001-2011, USA.

作者信息

Ballester Lance S, Auchincloss Amy H, Robinson Lucy F, Mayne Stephanie L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;14(3):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030318.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14030318
PMID:28335533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5369154/
Abstract

In the USA, little is known about local variation in retail cigarette prices; price variation explained by taxes, bans, and area-level socio-demographics, and whether taxes and hospitality bans have synergistic effects on smoking prevalence. Cigarette prices 2001-2011 from chain supermarkets and drug stores ( = 2973) were linked to state taxes ( = 41), state and county bar/restaurant smoking bans, and census block group socio-demographics. Hierarchical models explored effects of taxes and bans on retail cigarette prices as well as county smoking prevalence (daily, non-daily). There was wide variation in store-level cigarette prices in part due to differences in state excise taxes. Excise taxes were only partially passed onto consumers (after adjustment, $1 tax associated with $0.90 increase in price, < 0.0001) and the pass-through was slightly higher in areas that had bans but did not differ by area-level socio-demographics. Bans were associated with a slight increase in cigarette price (after adjustment, $0.09 per-pack, < 0.0001). Taxes and bans were associated with reduction in smoking prevalence and taxes had a stronger association when combined with bans, suggesting a synergistic effect. Given wide variation in store-level prices, and uneven state/county implementation of taxes and bans, more federal policies should be considered.

摘要

在美国,人们对零售香烟价格的地区差异知之甚少;税收、禁令以及地区层面的社会人口统计学因素对价格差异的解释,以及税收和酒店业禁令对吸烟率是否具有协同效应。2001年至2011年连锁超市和药店(=2973家)的香烟价格与州税(=41种)、州和县级酒吧/餐厅吸烟禁令以及人口普查街区组社会人口统计学因素相关联。分层模型探讨了税收和禁令对零售香烟价格以及县吸烟率(每日吸烟、非每日吸烟)的影响。商店层面的香烟价格存在很大差异,部分原因是州消费税不同。消费税仅部分转嫁给消费者(调整后,1美元税收与价格上涨0.90美元相关联,<0.0001),并且在有禁令但地区层面社会人口统计学因素无差异的地区,这种转嫁略高。禁令与香烟价格略有上涨相关(调整后,每包0.09美元,<0.0001)。税收和禁令与吸烟率降低相关,并且税收与禁令结合时关联更强,表明存在协同效应。鉴于商店层面价格差异很大,以及州/县税收和禁令实施不均衡,应考虑更多联邦政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4271/5369154/b3c69c62ea28/ijerph-14-00318-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4271/5369154/b3c69c62ea28/ijerph-14-00318-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4271/5369154/b3c69c62ea28/ijerph-14-00318-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Impacts of Taxes and Hospitality Bans on Cigarette Prices and Smoking Prevalence Using a Large Dataset of Cigarette Prices at Stores 2001-2011, USA.利用2001年至2011年美国商店香烟价格的大型数据集,探究税收和酒店禁令对香烟价格及吸烟流行率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;14(3):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030318.
2
Longitudinal Associations of Local Cigarette Prices and Smoking Bans with Smoking Behavior in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.多民族动脉粥样硬化研究中局部香烟价格和禁烟令与吸烟行为的纵向关联。
Epidemiology. 2017 Nov;28(6):863-871. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000736.
3
Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.比较香烟最低限价和消费税政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的预期影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i60-i66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053230.
4
The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems.价格和烟草控制政策对电子尼古丁传送系统需求的影响。
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii41-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051515.
5
Cigarette excise tax structure and cigarette prices: evidence from the global adult tobacco survey and the U.S. National Adult Tobacco Survey.卷烟消费税结构和卷烟价格:来自全球成人烟草调查和美国全国成人烟草调查的证据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jan;16 Suppl 1:S3-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt121. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
6
[Application of the cigarette purchase tasks in achieving China' s tobacco control goals].[香烟购买任务在实现中国烟草控制目标中的应用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 18;56(3):479-486. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.015.
7
A Nationwide Assessment of the Association of Smoking Bans and Cigarette Taxes With Hospitalizations for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia.一项关于吸烟禁令和香烟税与急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭及肺炎住院率之间关联的全国性评估。
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Dec;74(6):687-704. doi: 10.1177/1077558716668646. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
8
Neighborhood Variation in the Price of Cheap Tobacco Products in California: Results From Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community.加利福尼亚州廉价烟草产品价格的邻里差异:健康商店促进健康社区的研究结果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1330-1337. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx089.
9
Racial and Ethnic Differences in What Smokers Report Paying for Their Cigarettes.吸烟者所报告的购买香烟支出方面的种族和族裔差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1649-55. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw033. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
10
Association of state tobacco control policies with active smoking at the time of intervention for intermittent claudication.州级烟草控制政策与间歇性跛行干预时的主动吸烟之间的关联。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1759-1768.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.156. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco industry pricing strategies for single cigarettes and multistick packs after excise tax increases in Colombia.哥伦比亚提高消费税之后,烟草业对单支香烟和多支装香烟的定价策略。
Tob Control. 2023 Dec 13;33(1):59-66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2022-057333.
2
Assessing the Effects of a Tobacco Tax Reform on the Industry Price-Setting Strategy.评估烟草税改革对行业定价策略的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 2;18(19):10376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910376.
3
Tobacco industry pricing strategies in response to excise tax policies: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in market share of leading cigarette brands in the USA: national survey on drug use and health 2002-2013.美国主要香烟品牌的市场份额趋势:2002 - 2013年全国药物使用与健康调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e008813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008813.
2
Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2014.成年人当前吸烟状况 - 美国,2005-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Nov 13;64(44):1233-40. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6444a2.
3
Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase.全州烟草税提高前后的烟草产品价格。
烟草业应对消费税政策的定价策略:系统评价。
Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):239-250. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056630. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):166-73. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052018. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
4
Young adult social smokers: their co-use of tobacco and alcohol, tobacco-related attitudes, and quitting efforts.年轻成年社交吸烟者:他们对烟草和酒精的同时使用、与烟草相关的态度以及戒烟努力。
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
Does every US smoker bear the same cigarette tax?每个美国吸烟者承担的香烟税都一样吗?
Addiction. 2014 Oct;109(10):1741-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12630. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
6
Making it harder to smoke and easier to quit: the effect of 10 years of tobacco control in New York City.使吸烟更难、戒烟更容易:纽约市控烟 10 年的效果。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):e5-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301940. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
7
Cigarette smoking prevalence in US counties: 1996-2012.美国各县的吸烟率:1996-2012 年。
Popul Health Metr. 2014 Mar 24;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-12-5.
8
Smoking ban policies and their influence on smoking behaviors among current California smokers: a population-based study.吸烟禁令政策及其对加利福尼亚州现有吸烟者吸烟行为的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Prev Med. 2014 Feb;59:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
9
Cigarette tax avoidance and evasion: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project.香烟避税与逃税:国际烟草控制政策评估(ITC)项目的研究结果
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i13-22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051074. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
Excise tax avoidance: the case of state cigarette taxes.消费税规避:以州卷烟税为例。
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1130-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 7.