Suppr超能文献

组织特异性对于 RNA-seq 的重要性:突出复合结构提取的错误。

The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2013 Aug 28;14:586. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-586.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A composite biological structure, such as an insect head or abdomen, contains many internal structures with distinct functions. Composite structures are often used in RNA-seq studies, though it is unclear how expression of the same gene in different tissues and structures within the same structure affects the measurement (or even utility) of the resulting patterns of gene expression. Here we determine how complex composite tissue structure affects measures of gene expression using RNA-seq.

RESULTS

We focus on two structures in the honey bee (the sting gland and digestive tract) both contained within one larger structure, the whole abdomen. For each of the three structures, we used RNA-seq to identify differentially expressed genes between two developmental stages, nurse bees and foragers. Based on RNA-seq for each structure-specific extraction, we found that RNA-seq with composite structures leads to many false negatives (genes strongly differentially expressed in particular structures which are not found to be differentially expressed within the composite structure). We also found a significant number of genes with one pattern of differential expression in the tissue-specific extraction, and the opposite in the composite extraction, suggesting multiple signals from such genes within the composite structure. We found these patterns for different classes of genes including transcription factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Many RNA-seq studies currently use composite extractions, and even whole insect extractions, when tissue and structure specific extractions are possible. This is due to the logistical difficultly of micro-dissection and unawareness of the potential errors associated with composite extractions. The present study suggests that RNA-seq studies of composite structures are prone to false negatives and difficult to interpret positive signals for genes with variable patterns of local expression. In general, our results suggest that RNA-seq on large composite structures should be avoided unless it is possible to demonstrate that the effects shown here do not exist for the genes of interest.

摘要

背景

昆虫的头部或腹部等复合生物结构包含许多具有不同功能的内部结构。复合结构常用于 RNA-seq 研究,但尚不清楚同一结构内不同组织和结构中同一基因的表达如何影响基因表达模式的测量(甚至实用性)。在这里,我们使用 RNA-seq 确定复杂的复合组织结构如何影响基因表达的测量。

结果

我们专注于蜜蜂(刺腺和消化道)两个结构,它们都包含在一个更大的结构——整个腹部中。对于这三个结构中的每一个,我们都使用 RNA-seq 来识别两个发育阶段(蜂后和觅食者)之间差异表达的基因。基于每个结构特异性提取的 RNA-seq,我们发现使用复合结构进行 RNA-seq 会导致许多假阴性(在特定结构中强烈差异表达但在复合结构中未发现差异表达的基因)。我们还发现了大量基因在组织特异性提取中有一种差异表达模式,而在复合提取中则相反,这表明复合结构中此类基因存在多种信号。我们在不同类别的基因中发现了这些模式,包括转录因子。

结论

许多 RNA-seq 研究目前使用复合提取,甚至是整个昆虫提取,而组织和结构特异性提取是可能的。这是由于微解剖的逻辑困难和对复合提取相关潜在错误的认识不足。本研究表明,复合结构的 RNA-seq 容易出现假阴性,并且对于具有可变局部表达模式的基因,阳性信号难以解释。一般来说,除非可以证明这里显示的效果不存在于感兴趣的基因中,否则应避免对大型复合结构进行 RNA-seq。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a72/3765781/a59f1f0a6de4/1471-2164-14-586-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验