Huang Li-feng, Yao Yong-ming, Dong Ning, He Li-xin, Zhang Qing-hong, Yu Yan, Sheng Zhi-yong
Burns Institute, the First Hospital Affiliated to the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;29(2):148-51.
To observe the changes in plasma gelsolin (pGSN) level of patients with severe burn and to explore its relationship with sepsis and death of patients.
One hundred and two patients with total burn area equal to or larger than 30% TBSA hospitalized from May 2010 to May 2012 were included as burn group. Twenty-five healthy volunteers were recruited as healthy control group. Peripheral venous blood of patients was harvested on post burn day (PBD) 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 to determine the pGSN level with double antibody sandwich ELISA kits, and the same maneuver was carried out in healthy volunteers. (1) Patients in burn group were divided into three groups by burn size: small burn area group (30% - 49% TBSA, n = 39), medium burn area group (larger than 49% and smaller than or equal to 69% TBSA, n = 33), and large burn area group (larger than 69% and smaller than or equal to 99% TBSA, n = 30). (2) According to diagnostic criteria of burn sepsis, patients in burn group were divided into sepsis group (n = 43) and non-sepsis group (n = 59). (3) According to the prognosis of patients with sepsis, patients in sepsis group were further divided into non-survival sepsis group (n = 14) and survival sepsis group (n = 29). The levels of pGSN in above groups were compared, and their relationship with sepsis and death of patients was analyzed. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, LSD test and one-way Logistic regressions.
(1) Levels of pGSN in burn group were obviously lower than those of healthy control group on PBD 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 (with F values respectively 140.01, 369.52, 702.15, 360.14, 84.16, P values all below 0.01). (2) The mean levels of pGSN in large, medium, and small burn area groups at five time points were (43 ± 11), (85 ± 23), (124 ± 38) mg/L, showing statistically significant differences among them (F = 367.76, P < 0.01), and they were all lower than that of healthy control group [(326 ± 51) mg/L, P values all below 0.01]. (3) The mean levels of pGSN in sepsis group and non-sepsis group at the five time points were (77 ± 12), (122 ± 38) mg/L. Levels of pGSN in sepsis group were lower than those in non-sepsis group on PBD 3, 7, 14, and 21 (with F values respectively 30.35, 111.59, 209.36, 422.76, P values all below 0.01). (4) The mean levels of pGSN in non-survival sepsis group and survival sepsis group at the five time points were (53 ± 8) and (103 ± 25) mg/L. Levels of pGSN in non-survival sepsis group were lower than those in survival sepsis group on PBD 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 (with F values respectively 9.05, 18.48, 41.34, 107.11, 180.48, P values all below 0.01). (5) Logistic regression analysis showed that the level of pGSN is the independent risk factor related to the complication of sepsis (odds ratio: 5.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.35 - 12.74, P < 0.01) and death (odds ratio: 5.52, 95% confidence interval: 2.34 - 12.19, P < 0.01) in burn patients.
Severe burn injury could down-regulate the pGSN level of patients, and it decreases along with the increase in the area and severity of burn trauma. pGSN level appears to be an early prognostic marker for patients suffering from severe burns.
观察重度烧伤患者血浆凝溶胶蛋白(pGSN)水平的变化,探讨其与患者脓毒症及死亡的关系。
选取2010年5月至2012年5月住院的烧伤总面积大于或等于30%TBSA的102例患者作为烧伤组。招募25名健康志愿者作为健康对照组。于烧伤后第1、3、7、14和21天采集患者外周静脉血,采用双抗体夹心ELISA试剂盒测定pGSN水平,健康志愿者也进行同样操作。(1)烧伤组患者按烧伤面积分为三组:小面积烧伤组(30% - 49%TBSA,n = 39)、中面积烧伤组(大于49%且小于或等于69%TBSA,n = 33)和大面积烧伤组(大于69%且小于或等于99%TBSA,n = 30)。(2)根据烧伤脓毒症诊断标准,将烧伤组患者分为脓毒症组(n = 43)和非脓毒症组(n = 59)。(3)根据脓毒症患者预后情况,将脓毒症组患者进一步分为脓毒症死亡组(n = 14)和脓毒症存活组(n = 29)。比较上述各组pGSN水平,分析其与患者脓毒症及死亡的关系。数据采用方差分析、LSD检验和单因素Logistic回归分析。
(1)烧伤组患者在烧伤后第1、3、7、14和21天的pGSN水平明显低于健康对照组(F值分别为140.01、369.52、702.15、360.14、84.16,P值均<0.01)。(2)大面积、中面积和小面积烧伤组五个时间点的pGSN平均水平分别为(43±11)、(85±23)、(124±38)mg/L,差异有统计学意义(F = 367.76,P < 0.01),且均低于健康对照组[(326±51)mg/L,P值均<0.01]。(3)脓毒症组和非脓毒症组五个时间点的pGSN平均水平分别为(77±12)、(122±38)mg/L。脓毒症组患者在烧伤后第3、7、14和21天的pGSN水平低于非脓毒症组(F值分别为30.35、111.59、209.36、422.76,P值均<0.01)。(4)脓毒症死亡组和脓毒症存活组五个时间点的pGSN平均水平分别为(53±8)和(103±25)mg/L。脓毒症死亡组患者在烧伤后第1、3、7、14和21天的pGSN水平低于脓毒症存活组(F值分别为9.05、18.48、41.34、107.11、180.48,P值均<0.01)。(5)Logistic回归分析显示,pGSN水平是烧伤患者脓毒症并发症(比值比:5.44,95%置信区间:2.35 - 12.74,P < 0.01)和死亡(比值比:5.52,95%置信区间:2.34 - 12.19,P < 0.01)的独立危险因素。
重度烧伤可下调患者pGSN水平,且随烧伤创伤面积和严重程度的增加而降低。pGSN水平似乎是重度烧伤患者的早期预后指标。