Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester Manchester, UK ; Japan Society of the Promotion of Science Tokyo, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 26;7:422. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00422. eCollection 2013.
Ever since the 19th century, the standard model for spoken language processing has assumed two pathways for repetition-a phonological pathway and a semantic pathway-and this idea has gained further support in the last decade. First, recent in vivo tractography studies have demonstrated both the "dorsal" (via arcuate fasciculus) and "ventral" (via extreme capsule and uncinate fasciculus) pathways connecting from the primary auditory area to the speech-motor area, the latter of which passes through a brain area associated with semantic processing (anterior temporal lobe). Secondly, neuropsychological evidence for the role of semantics in repetition is conduite d'approche, a successive phonological improvement (sometimes non-improvement) in aphasic patients' response by repeating several times in succession. Crucially, conduite d'approche is observed in patients with neurological damage in/around the arcuate fasciculus. Successful conduite d'approche is especially clear for semantically-intact patients and it occurs for real words rather than for non-words. These features have led researchers to hypothesize that the patients' disrupted phonological output is "cleaned-up" by intact lexical-semantic information before the next repetition. We tested this hypothesis using the neuroanatomically-constrained dual dorsal-ventral pathway computational model. The results showed that (a) damage to the dorsal pathway impaired repetition; (b) in the context of recovery, the model learned to compute a correct repetition response following the model's own noisy speech output (i.e., successful conduite d'approche); (c) this behavior was more evident for real words than non-words; and (d) activation from the ventral pathway contributed to the increased rate of successful conduite d'approche for real words. These results suggest that lexical-semantic "clean-up" is key to this self-correcting mechanism, supporting the classic proposal of two pathways for repetition.
自 19 世纪以来,口语处理的标准模型假设了两种重复途径——语音途径和语义途径——这一观点在过去十年中得到了进一步的支持。首先,最近的活体轨迹研究表明,从主要听觉区域到言语运动区域存在连接的“背侧”(通过弓状束)和“腹侧”(通过极囊和钩束)途径,后者通过与语义处理相关的大脑区域(颞前叶)。其次,重复过程中语义作用的神经心理学证据表明,在连续重复几次时,失语症患者的反应会出现连续的语音改善(有时也不会改善),这种现象被称为“渐进发音法”。至关重要的是,在弓状束内或周围有神经损伤的患者中观察到了渐进发音法。对于语义完整的患者,渐进发音法尤其明显,并且适用于实义词而不是非词。这些特征促使研究人员假设,患者受损的语音输出在进行下一次重复之前,会被完整的词汇语义信息“清理”。我们使用受神经解剖结构约束的双背腹途径计算模型来检验这一假设。结果表明:(a)背侧通路的损伤会影响重复;(b)在恢复的情况下,模型会根据自身的嘈杂语音输出计算出正确的重复反应(即成功的渐进发音法);(c)这种行为在实义词中比在非词中更为明显;(d)腹侧通路的激活有助于提高实义词成功渐进发音法的速度。这些结果表明,词汇语义“清理”是这种自我纠正机制的关键,支持了重复存在两种途径的经典观点。