Suppr超能文献

954 例蜂蜇过敏患者的纵向研究。

Longitudinal study of 954 patients with stinging insect anaphylaxis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Asthma and Allergy, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Sep;111(3):199-204.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stinging insect anaphylaxis (SIA) is a common cause of anaphylaxis and is potentially life-threatening.

OBJECTIVES

To examine US patients with an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for SIA to evaluate postdischarge follow-up care.

METHODS

We identified all patients with an ED visit or hospitalization for SIA during 2002-2008 in the MarketScan Database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (index date was the initial ED visit or hospitalization). Patients were required to have continuous full insurance coverage for 1 year or more before and after index. We examined patient factors during the preindex period, characteristics of the index event, and outcomes during the postindex period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of receiving preventive anaphylaxis care.

RESULTS

We identified 954 patients with an ED visit or hospitalization for SIA (mean [SD] age, 46 [19] years; 41% female). A total of 85% of patients were discharged directly from the ED. For those hospitalized, the mean hospital stay was 1 day, and 50% spent time in the intensive care unit. Cardiorespiratory failure occurred in 27% of those hospitalized. During the postindex period, 69% filled 1 or more epinephrine autoinjector prescription, but only 14% had 1 or more allergist/immunologist visit. Independent factors associated with receiving preventive anaphylaxis care during the postindex period were higher household income, no ED visit (for any reason) in the preindex period, and no cardiorespiratory arrest or failure during the index event.

CONCLUSION

Although two-thirds of patients filled a prescription for an epinephrine autoinjector after an ED visit or hospitalization for SIA, only 14% of patients received follow-up care by an allergist/immunologist. This missed opportunity to provide venom immunotherapy, an essentially curative therapy, unnecessarily places patients at risk for recurrent anaphylaxis.

摘要

背景

蜇伤性过敏反应(SIA)是过敏反应的常见原因,且可能危及生命。

目的

评估蜇伤性过敏反应患者出院后的随访情况,以调查美国急诊科(ED)就诊或住院患者的情况。

方法

我们使用国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修正版(ICD-9-CM)代码(索引日期为首次 ED 就诊或住院),在 MarketScan 数据库中确定了 2002 年至 2008 年间所有因 ED 就诊或住院的 SIA 患者。患者需在索引日期前后至少 1 年有持续的全保险覆盖。我们检查了索引前期间的患者因素、索引事件的特征以及索引后期间的结果。多变量逻辑回归用于确定接受预防过敏反应护理的独立预测因素。

结果

我们确定了 954 例因 ED 就诊或住院的 SIA 患者(平均[标准差]年龄为 46[19]岁;41%为女性)。85%的患者直接从 ED 出院。对于住院患者,平均住院时间为 1 天,50%的患者在重症监护病房。住院患者中有 27%出现心肺衰竭。在索引后期间,69%的患者开了 1 份或多份肾上腺素自动注射器处方,但只有 14%的患者看了 1 次或多次过敏/免疫学家。索引后期间接受预防过敏反应护理的独立因素包括高家庭收入、索引前期间无 ED 就诊(无论任何原因)和索引事件期间无心肺骤停或衰竭。

结论

尽管三分之二的患者在 ED 就诊或住院后开了肾上腺素自动注射器处方,但只有 14%的患者接受了过敏/免疫学家的随访。这种错过提供变应原免疫治疗的机会,即一种基本治愈的治疗方法,不必要地使患者面临复发性过敏反应的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验