Liu Xun, Chen Yan-Ru, Li Ning-shan, Wang Cheng, Lv Lin-Sheng, Li Ming, Wu Xiao-Ming, Lou Tan-Qi
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Nephrol. 2013 Aug 29;14:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-181.
Accurate and precise estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are essential for clinical assessments, and many methods of estimation are available. We developed a radial basis function (RBF) network and assessed the performance of this method in the estimation of the GFRs of 207 patients with type-2 diabetes and CKD.
Standard GFR (sGFR) was determined by (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging and GFR was also estimated by the 6-variable MDRD equation and the 4-variable MDRD equation.
Bland-Altman analysis indicated that estimates from the RBF network were more precise than those from the other two methods for some groups of patients. However, the median difference of RBF network estimates from sGFR was greater than those from the other two estimates, indicating greater bias. For patients with stage I/II CKD, the median absolute difference of the RBF network estimate from sGFR was significantly lower, and the P50 of the RBF network estimate (n = 56, 87.5%) was significantly higher than that of the MDRD-4 estimate (n = 49, 76.6%) (p < 0.0167), indicating that the RBF network estimate provided greater accuracy for these patients.
In patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus, estimation of GFR by our RBF network provided better precision and accuracy for some groups of patients than the estimation by the traditional MDRD equations. However, the RBF network estimates of GFR tended to have greater bias and higher than those indicated by sGFR determined by (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging.
准确精确地估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)对于临床评估至关重要,且有多种估算方法可供使用。我们开发了一种径向基函数(RBF)网络,并评估了该方法在估算207例2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者GFR方面的性能。
通过(99m)锝-二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)肾动态显像确定标准GFR(sGFR),并分别采用6变量简化肾脏病膳食改良(MDRD)方程和4变量MDRD方程估算GFR。
Bland-Altman分析表明,对于部分患者组,RBF网络估算值比其他两种方法的估算值更精确。然而,RBF网络估算值与sGFR的中位数差异大于其他两种估算方法,表明偏差更大。对于I/II期CKD患者,RBF网络估算值与sGFR的中位数绝对差异显著更低,且RBF网络估算值的第50百分位数(n = 56,87.5%)显著高于MDRD-4估算值的第50百分位数(n = 49,76.6%)(p < 0.0167),表明RBF网络估算值为这些患者提供了更高的准确性。
在2型糖尿病患者中,与传统MDRD方程估算相比,我们的RBF网络估算GFR对部分患者组而言具有更高的精度和准确性。然而,RBF网络估算的GFR往往偏差更大,且高于(99m)Tc-DTPA肾动态显像确定sGFR所显示的值。