Department of Pharmaceutics, Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, P.O. Chattikara, Mathura, 281001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013 Dec;14(4):1321-32. doi: 10.1208/s12249-013-0014-6. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
The present research work focused on the comparative assessment of porous versus nonporous films in order to develop a suitable buccoadhesive device for the delivery of glibenclamide. Both films were prepared by solvent casting technique using the 3(2) full factorial design, developing nine formulations (F1-F9). The films were evaluated for ex vivo mucoadhesive force, ex vivo mucoadhesion time, in vitro drug release (using a modified flow-through drug release apparatus), and ex vivo drug permeation. The mucoadhesive force, mucoadhesion time, swelling index, and tensile strength were observed to be directly proportional to the content of HPMC K4M. The optimized porous film (F4) showed an in vitro drug release of 84.47 ± 0.98%, ex vivo mucoadhesive force of 0.24 ± 0.04 N, and ex vivo mucoadhesion time of 539.11 ± 3.05 min, while the nonporous film (NF4) with the same polymer composition showed a release of 62.66 ± 0.87%, mucoadhesive force of 0.20 ± 0.05 N, and mucoadhesive time of 510 ± 2.00 min. The porous film showed significant differences for drug release and mucoadhesion time (p < 0.05) versus the nonporous film. The mechanism of drug release was observed to follow non-Fickian diffusion (0.1 < n < 0.5) for both porous and nonporous films. Ex vivo permeation studies through chicken buccal mucosa indicated improved drug permeation in porous films versus nonporous films. The present investigation established porous films to be a cost-effective buccoadhesive delivery system of glibenclamide.
本研究工作集中于多孔与非多孔薄膜的比较评估,以便开发适用于格列本脲传递的颊黏膜粘附制剂。两种薄膜均通过溶剂浇铸技术,使用 3(2)完全析因设计,制备了九种配方(F1-F9)。对薄膜进行了体外粘膜粘附力、体外粘膜粘附时间、体外药物释放(使用改良的流通药物释放装置)和体外药物渗透的评估。观察到粘膜粘附力、粘膜粘附时间、溶胀指数和拉伸强度与 HPMC K4M 的含量成正比。优化的多孔薄膜(F4)显示出 84.47±0.98%的体外药物释放、0.24±0.04 N 的体外粘膜粘附力和 539.11±3.05 min 的体外粘膜粘附时间,而具有相同聚合物组成的非多孔薄膜(NF4)则显示出 62.66±0.87%的释放、0.20±0.05 N 的粘膜粘附力和 510±2.00 min 的粘膜粘附时间。与非多孔薄膜相比,多孔薄膜在药物释放和粘膜粘附时间方面表现出显著差异(p<0.05)。观察到药物释放的机制对于多孔和非多孔薄膜均遵循非 Fickian 扩散(0.1<n<0.5)。通过鸡颊黏膜的体外渗透研究表明,多孔薄膜与非多孔薄膜相比,药物渗透得到了改善。本研究确立了多孔薄膜作为格列本脲颊黏膜粘附传递的一种具有成本效益的制剂。