• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为未来进行长期支持与服务规划:来自对婴儿潮一代及老年人的全州范围调查的启示

Long-term supports and services planning for the future: implications from a statewide survey of Baby Boomers and older adults.

作者信息

Robison Julie, Shugrue Noreen, Fortinsky Richard H, Gruman Cynthia

机构信息

*Address correspondence to Julie Robison, Center on Aging, University of Connecticut Health Center, MC 5215, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-5215. E-mail:

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2014 Apr;54(2):297-313. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt094. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnt094
PMID:23990621
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Little is known about adults' future planning for long-term supports and services (LTSS), and no studies have examined how LTSS planning compares between Baby Boomers and their parents' generation. The primary aim of this study is to examine the potential influences of birth cohort and gender on LTSS planning. Drawing on Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, birth cohort and gender are viewed as predisposing characteristics, and several additional predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics are included as independent variables.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Cross-sectional design; data obtained from a statewide survey of 2,522 randomly selected Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) and older adults (born before 1946).

RESULTS

Two thirds of respondents expected to need LTSS, but few reported saving for such services. Controlling for other independent variables, compared with older adults, Baby Boomers were significantly more likely to plan to move to an apartment, live in a retirement community or assisted living, and live with an adult child. Conversely, women were more likely than men to report planning to use specific LTSS such as homecare, but specific LTSS plans did not vary by birth cohort.

IMPLICATIONS

Policymakers and providers should prepare for a shift in community planning to accommodate the changing plans and expectations of Baby Boomers, large numbers of whom plan to age in existing homes and retirement communities, or live with adult children, with increasing demand for informal family support. The LTSS industry should also adapt to meet the need for formal services, which will likely continue to grow.

摘要

研究目的

对于成年人针对长期支持与服务(LTSS)的未来规划,我们了解甚少,且尚无研究考察婴儿潮一代与其父母辈在LTSS规划方面的比较情况。本研究的主要目的是考察出生队列和性别对LTSS规划的潜在影响。借鉴安德森的卫生服务利用行为模型,出生队列和性别被视为易患特征,同时还纳入了其他几个易患、促成和需求特征作为自变量。

设计与方法

横断面设计;数据来自对2522名随机抽取的婴儿潮一代(出生于1946年至1964年之间)和老年人(出生于1946年之前)进行的全州范围调查。

结果

三分之二的受访者预计需要LTSS,但很少有人报告为这类服务存钱。在控制了其他自变量后,与老年人相比,婴儿潮一代更有可能计划搬到公寓居住、入住退休社区或辅助生活机构,以及与成年子女同住。相反,女性比男性更有可能报告计划使用诸如居家护理等特定的LTSS,但特定的LTSS计划在不同出生队列之间并无差异。

启示

政策制定者和服务提供者应为社区规划的转变做好准备,以适应婴儿潮一代不断变化的规划和期望。大量婴儿潮一代计划在现有住房和退休社区养老,或与成年子女同住,对非正式家庭支持的需求也日益增加。LTSS行业也应做出调整,以满足对正式服务可能持续增长的需求。

相似文献

1
Long-term supports and services planning for the future: implications from a statewide survey of Baby Boomers and older adults.为未来进行长期支持与服务规划:来自对婴儿潮一代及老年人的全州范围调查的启示
Gerontologist. 2014 Apr;54(2):297-313. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt094. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
2
Health and health care utilization among obese and diabetic baby boomers and older adults.肥胖和糖尿病的婴儿潮一代及老年人的健康和医疗保健利用。
Am J Health Promot. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(2):123-32. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.111013-QUAN-366.
3
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.
4
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.社区长期服务与支持:迈向研究议程。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
5
The Role of Place in Person- and Family-Oriented Long-Term Services and Supports.地方在面向个人和家庭的长期服务和支持中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1076-1138. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12664. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Adapting Andersen's expanded behavioral model of health services use to include older adults receiving long-term services and supports.将 Andersen 的扩展行为模型应用于健康服务利用,以包括接受长期服务和支持的老年人。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1405-7.
7
Re-imagining long-term services and supports: towards livable environments, service capacity, and enhanced community integration, choice, and quality of life for seniors.重新构想长期服务与支持:迈向适居环境、服务能力以及提升老年人的社区融合度、选择权和生活质量。
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):286-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv016. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
Physical Functioning Among Older Adults New to Long-Term Services and Supports.老年人长期服务与支持新用户的身体机能。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1147-1155. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx082.
9
Factors Associated With Changes in Perceived Quality of Life Among Elderly Recipients of Long-Term Services and Supports.长期服务与支持老年受助者生活质量感知变化的相关因素
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
10
What factors are associated with having an advance directive among older adults who are new to long term care services?哪些因素与刚进入长期护理服务的老年人中拥有预立医疗指示有关?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jan;13(1):82.e7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Black-White Differences in Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Deserts: Implications for Unmet Care Needs.长期服务与支持(LTSS)荒漠中的黑白差异:对未满足护理需求的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Jul 22;26(9):105758. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105758.
2
Perspectives on the Challenges of Planning for and Accessing Long-Term Dementia Care Services Through Medicaid and Medicaid Waivers.关于通过医疗补助计划及医疗补助豁免项目规划和获取长期痴呆症护理服务所面临挑战的观点
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Apr 28:7334648251333181. doi: 10.1177/07334648251333181.
3
Perceptions and Experiences of Caregiver-Employees, Employers, and Health Care Professionals With Caregiver-Friendly Workplace Policy in Hong Kong: Thematic Analysis.
香港照顾者友好型职场政策下照顾者员工、雇主及医护专业人员的认知与经历:主题分析
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Feb 10;14:e58528. doi: 10.2196/58528.
4
Changes in Tangible Social Support Over Time Among Older Adults Receiving Long-Term Services and Supports.老年人接受长期服务和支持时有形社会支持的变化。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 May;42(5):981-991. doi: 10.1177/07334648221150966. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
The Role of Dementia and Residential Service Agency Characteristics in the Care Experiences of Maryland Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Participants and Family and Unpaid Caregivers.痴呆症和住宅服务机构特征在马里兰州医疗补助家庭和社区服务参与者及其家庭和无报酬照顾者的护理体验中的作用。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Apr;42(4):627-638. doi: 10.1177/07334648221128286. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
Paid Help and Caregiving Experiences of Black Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.黑人社区居住的老年人护理者的有偿帮助和护理经历。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;46(1):91-100. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2099776. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Gender Disparity and the Association Between Socioeconomic Status, Mental Health, and the Need for Long-Term Services and Support Among the Older Koreans.性别差异以及社会经济地位、心理健康与韩国老年人对长期服务和支持的需求之间的关系。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;10:888011. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.888011. eCollection 2022.
8
Children of the Revolution: The Impact of 1960s and 1970s Cultural Identification on Baby Boomers' Views on Retirement.革命的一代:20 世纪 60 年代和 70 年代文化认同对婴儿潮一代退休观的影响。
Res Aging. 2022 Oct-Dec;44(9-10):747-757. doi: 10.1177/01640275211068456. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
9
The Influence of Race and Gender on Receiving Assistance With Daily Activities Among Older Americans.种族和性别对美国老年人日常生活获得帮助情况的影响
Innov Aging. 2021 Dec 30;6(2):igab060. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab060. eCollection 2022.
10
Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation.关于衰老相关准备的观点。
J Elder Policy. 2021 Spring;1(2). doi: 10.18278/jep.1.2.7.