Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):491-500. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.818176.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during ambulance transport can be a safety risk for providers and can affect CPR quality. In many Asian countries with basic life support (BLS) systems, patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are routinely transported in ambulances in which CPR is performed. This paper aims to make recommendations on best practices for CPR during ambulance transport in BLS systems.
A panel consisting of 20 experts (including 4 North Americans) in emergency medical services (EMS) and resuscitation science was selected, and met over two days. We performed a literature review and selected 33 candidate issues in five core areas. Using Delphi methodology, the issues were classified into dichotomous (yes/no), multiple choice, and ranking questions. Primary consensus between experts was reached when there was more than 70% agreement. Questions with 60-69% agreement were made more specific and were submitted for a second round of voting.
The panel agreed upon 24 consensus statements with more than 70% agreement (2 rounds of voting). The recommendations cover the following: length of time on the scene; advanced airway at the scene; CPR prior to transport; rhythm analysis and defibrillation during transport; prehospital interventions; field termination of resuscitation (TOR); consent for TOR; destination hospital; transport protocol; number of staff members; restraint systems; mechanical CPR; turning off of the engine for rhythm analysis; alternative CPR; and feedback for CPR quality.
Recommendations for CPR during ambulance transport were developed using the Delphi method. These recommendations should be validated in clinical settings.
在救护车转运过程中进行心肺复苏(CPR)可能会对医护人员的安全造成风险,并影响 CPR 质量。在许多具有基本生命支持(BLS)系统的亚洲国家,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者通常在进行 CPR 的救护车上进行转运。本文旨在为 BLS 系统中 CPR 在救护车转运期间的最佳实践提出建议。
选择了一个由 20 名急救医疗服务(EMS)和复苏科学方面的专家(包括 4 名北美人)组成的小组,并在两天内进行了会面。我们进行了文献回顾,并在五个核心领域中选择了 33 个候选问题。使用 Delphi 方法,将这些问题分为二项式(是/否)、多项选择和排序问题。当专家的意见达成 70%以上的一致时,即可达成初步共识。对于意见达成 60-69%的问题,我们会使其更加具体,并提交第二轮投票。
专家组就 24 项共识声明达成了超过 70%的一致意见(两轮投票)。这些建议涵盖以下内容:在现场的时间长度;现场进行高级气道干预;在转运前进行 CPR;在转运过程中进行节律分析和除颤;院前干预措施;现场终止复苏(TOR);TOR 的同意书;目的地医院;转运方案;工作人员数量;约束系统;机械 CPR;为进行节律分析而关闭发动机;替代 CPR;以及 CPR 质量的反馈。
使用 Delphi 方法制定了救护车转运过程中 CPR 的建议。这些建议应在临床环境中进行验证。