Malinsky A H
Fachbereich Angewandte Okologie und Umweltplanung, Universität Linz.
Pneumologie. 1990 Jul;44(7):868-70.
To date, environmental policy has been primarily reactive and curative. For the most part, it concentrated on repairing damage already done--and this restricted to only certain sections of the overall complex environment/society interrelationship. Such an approach has numerous defects: for example, problems are usually solved only in restricted areas, only to appear again in a different form in a different area, space and time. It is thus becoming ever more apparent that environmental policy requires a completely new approach, the direction of which appears clear: on the one hand greater involvement of the population, on the other a shift to damage containment to damage prevention. From the point of view of this new preventive environmental policy, the question is investigated as to whether and to what extent ecological requirements can be integrated into such traditional areas of farming, technology and energy, and how ecological thinkcan be generally integrated within policy areas with environmental relevance.
迄今为止，环境政策主要是被动应对和补救性的。在很大程度上，它专注于修复已经造成的损害——而且这种修复仅限于整体复杂的环境/社会相互关系中的某些部分。这种方法有许多缺陷：例如，问题通常仅在有限的领域得到解决，结果却又会在不同的领域、空间和时间以不同的形式再次出现。因此，越来越明显的是，环境政策需要一种全新的方法，其方向似乎很明确：一方面让民众更多地参与，另一方面从损害控制转向损害预防。从这种新的预防性环境政策的角度出发，研究了生态要求能否以及在多大程度上能够融入农业、技术和能源等传统领域，以及生态思维如何能够普遍融入与环境相关的政策领域。
