Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;45(1):104-10. doi: 10.1021/es101463y. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
The 40 years that have passed since the beginning of the 'environmental revolution' has seen a large increase in development of policies for the protection of environmental media and a recognition by the public of the importance of environmental quality. There has been a shift from policy in reaction to high profile events, then to control of releases to single environmental media, and to the present position of moving toward integrated management of all environmental media at present. This development has moved away from classical chemical risk assessment toward environmental holism, including recognition of the ecological value of these media. This work details how policy developments have taken place for air and water, with examples from the USA and EU, in order to compare this with policy development regarding soil. Soil, with quite different policy frameworks and distinct uses, understanding, and threats compared to other environmental media, is currently attracting attention regarding the need for its protection independent of use. Challenges for soil policy are identified and evaluated, and recommendations on how these challenges can be overcome are discussed with relevance to water and air protection policy.
自“环境革命”开始以来的 40 年见证了环境保护政策的大量发展,公众也认识到了环境质量的重要性。政策已经从针对高知名度事件的反应转变为对单一环境介质的释放控制,目前正朝着综合管理所有环境介质的方向发展。这种发展已经从经典的化学风险评估转向了环境整体主义,包括认识到这些介质的生态价值。本文详细介绍了美国和欧盟在空气和水方面的政策发展情况,以便将其与土壤政策的发展进行比较。土壤具有与其他环境介质不同的政策框架和独特的用途、理解和威胁,目前人们关注的是需要在不考虑用途的情况下对其进行保护。本文确定并评估了土壤政策面临的挑战,并讨论了如何克服这些挑战,这些建议与水和空气保护政策有关。