Wachter Jan K, Yorio Patrick L
Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Safety Sciences Department, Johnson Hall Room 137, 1010 Oakland Avenue, 15705-1063, United States.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Safety Sciences Department, Johnson Hall Room 137, 1010 Oakland Avenue, 15705-1063, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jul;68:117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
The overall research objective was to theoretically and empirically develop the ideas around a system of safety management practices (ten practices were elaborated), to test their relationship with objective safety statistics (such as accident rates), and to explore how these practices work to achieve positive safety results (accident prevention) through worker engagement.
Data were collected using safety manager, supervisor and employee surveys designed to assess and link safety management system practices, employee perceptions resulting from existing practices, and safety performance outcomes.
Results indicate the following: there is a significant negative relationship between the presence of ten individual safety management practices, as well as the composite of these practices, with accident rates; there is a significant negative relationship between the level of safety-focused worker emotional and cognitive engagement with accident rates; safety management systems and worker engagement levels can be used individually to predict accident rates; safety management systems can be used to predict worker engagement levels; and worker engagement levels act as mediators between the safety management system and safety performance outcomes (such as accident rates).
Even though the presence of safety management system practices is linked with incident reduction and may represent a necessary first-step in accident prevention, safety performance may also depend on mediation by safety-focused cognitive and emotional engagement by workers. Thus, when organizations invest in a safety management system approach to reducing/preventing accidents and improving safety performance, they should also be concerned about winning over the minds and hearts of their workers through human performance-based safety management systems designed to promote and enhance worker engagement.
总体研究目标是从理论和实证两方面拓展围绕安全管理实践体系(详细阐述了十种实践)的理念,检验这些实践与客观安全统计数据(如事故率)之间的关系,并探究这些实践如何通过员工参与来实现积极的安全成果(事故预防)。
通过安全经理、主管和员工调查收集数据,旨在评估和关联安全管理体系实践、现有实践所导致的员工认知以及安全绩效结果。
结果表明以下几点:十种单独的安全管理实践以及这些实践的综合与事故率之间存在显著的负相关关系;以安全为重点的员工情感和认知参与程度与事故率之间存在显著的负相关关系;安全管理体系和员工参与程度可单独用于预测事故率;安全管理体系可用于预测员工参与程度;并且员工参与程度在安全管理体系和安全绩效结果(如事故率)之间起中介作用。
尽管安全管理体系实践的存在与事故减少相关联且可能是事故预防的必要第一步,但安全绩效可能还取决于员工以安全为重点的认知和情感参与的调节作用。因此,当组织投资于安全管理体系方法以减少/预防事故并提高安全绩效时,它们还应关注通过基于人员绩效的安全管理体系来赢得员工的认可,这些体系旨在促进和增强员工参与。