Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Linhai, Zhejiang 317000, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Linhai, Zhejiang 317000, China.
Burns. 2014 May;40(3):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
This study was to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of by target-controlled infusion (TCI) for analgesia and sedation during burn dressing change, and to predict the effect-site concentration of sufentanil. Eighty burn patients were randomly and evenly divided into four groups according to target sufentanil effect-site concentration (0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml). The sufentanil-propofol TCI was carried out during dressing changes. The effect-site concentration of propofol was maintained at 1.2 μg/ml. The dose-response relationships of sufentanil for providing adequate analgesia were evaluated by visual analog scales and Ramsay sedation scores. The effect-site concentration of sufentanil was calculated by Probit regression analysis. Incidence of respiratory depression, doctors and patients' satisfaction and adverse events were assessed. The EC50 and EC95 of sufentanil to maintain anesthesia for uncovering the inner layer dressings during TCI were 0.278 ng/ml (95% CI 0.231-0.318 ng/ml) and 0.394 ng/ml (95% CI 0.366-0.530 ng/ml), respectively, while the EC50 and EC95 of sufentanil to maintain anesthesia for wound management were 0.349 ng/ml (95% CI 0.299-0.366 ng/ml) and 0.465 ng/ml (95% CI 0.430-0.563 ng/ml), respectively. Doctors and patients' satisfaction were significantly higher in the 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml groups than the 0.2 ng/ml group. One and three patients had respiratory depression in the 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml groups, respectively. No adverse events occurred after operations. In conclusion, low dose sufentanil-propofol TCI for anesthesia and sedation maintenance in burn dressing changes is feasible and effective, and wound management requires higher effect-site concentrations of sufentanil than disclosing inner layer dressings.
本研究旨在探讨靶控输注(TCI)用于烧伤换药时镇痛和镇静的可行性和效果,并预测舒芬太尼的效应部位浓度。80 例烧伤患者按目标舒芬太尼效应部位浓度(0.2、0.3、0.4 和 0.5ng/ml)随机分为四组。在换药过程中进行舒芬太尼-丙泊酚 TCI,丙泊酚效应部位浓度维持在 1.2μg/ml。采用视觉模拟评分和 Ramsay 镇静评分评估舒芬太尼提供充分镇痛的剂量反应关系。采用概率单位回归分析计算舒芬太尼的效应部位浓度。评估呼吸抑制的发生率、医生和患者的满意度以及不良事件。TCI 下揭开内层敷料时维持麻醉的舒芬太尼 EC50 和 EC95 分别为 0.278ng/ml(95%CI 0.231-0.318ng/ml)和 0.394ng/ml(95%CI 0.366-0.530ng/ml),而舒芬太尼维持伤口处理麻醉的 EC50 和 EC95 分别为 0.349ng/ml(95%CI 0.299-0.366ng/ml)和 0.465ng/ml(95%CI 0.430-0.563ng/ml)。0.4 和 0.5ng/ml 组的医生和患者满意度明显高于 0.2ng/ml 组。0.4 和 0.5ng/ml 组各有 1 例和 3 例患者发生呼吸抑制。术后无不良事件发生。结论,低剂量舒芬太尼-丙泊酚 TCI 用于烧伤换药时维持麻醉和镇静是可行且有效的,而伤口管理需要比揭开内层敷料更高的舒芬太尼效应部位浓度。