• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫切除术中输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的短期影响:一项初步随机对照试验。

Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1997. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1997
PMID:23993887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3844119/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve when ovarian preservation is planned in view of determining the feasibility of conducting the study on a larger scale.

DESIGN

Pilot randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care, academic medical center.

PATIENT(S): Thirty premenopausal women aged 18 to 45 years undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation for benign indications from April 2012 to September 2012.

INTERVENTION(S): Bilateral salpingectomy (n = 15) versus no salpingectomy (n = 15) at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Antimüllerian hormone (AMH) measured preoperatively, at 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively, and at 3 months postoperatively, with operative time and estimated blood loss abstracted from the medical records.

RESULT(S): The mean AMH levels were not statistically significantly different at baseline (2.26 vs. 2.25 ng/ml), 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively (1.03 vs. 1.25 ng/ml), or 3 months postoperatively (1.86 vs. 1.82 ng/ml) among women with salpingectomy versus no salpingectomy, respectively. There was also no statistically significant temporal change in the mean AMH level from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (-0.07 vs. -0.08 ng/ml) between the two groups. No difference in operative time (116 vs. 115 minutes) or estimated blood loss (70 vs. 91 mL) was observed.

CONCLUSION(S): Salpingectomy at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation is a safe procedure that does not appear to have any short-term deleterious effects on ovarian reserve, as measured by AMH level. Conducting a trial of this nature that is adequately powered with long-term follow-up evaluation would be feasible and is required to definitively confirm these results.

摘要

目的

鉴于在计划保留卵巢的情况下,探讨腹腔镜子宫切除术时行输卵管切除术对卵巢储备的短期影响,以确定在更大规模上进行该研究的可行性。

设计

前瞻性随机对照试验。

地点

学术型三级医疗中心。

患者

2012 年 4 月至 9 月期间因良性疾病接受腹腔镜子宫切除术并保留卵巢的 30 例年龄 18 至 45 岁的绝经前妇女。

干预

腹腔镜子宫切除术时行双侧输卵管切除术(n = 15)与不行输卵管切除术(n = 15)。

主要观察指标

术前、术后 4 至 6 周和术后 3 个月时测量抗苗勒管激素(AMH),并从病历中提取手术时间和估计失血量。

结果

输卵管切除术组与未行输卵管切除术组妇女的 AMH 水平在基线时(2.26 比 2.25ng/ml)、术后 4 至 6 周时(1.03 比 1.25ng/ml)和术后 3 个月时(1.86 比 1.82ng/ml)均无统计学差异。两组间 AMH 水平从基线至术后 3 个月的时间变化也无统计学差异(-0.07 比-0.08ng/ml)。手术时间(116 比 115 分钟)和估计失血量(70 比 91ml)也无差异。

结论

腹腔镜子宫切除术时行输卵管切除术是一种安全的手术,就 AMH 水平而言,似乎对卵巢储备没有短期的不良影响。进行此类具有长期随访评估的充分规模的试验是可行的,也是确定这些结果所必需的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f8/3844119/7cb1348ad8a9/nihms521020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f8/3844119/7cb1348ad8a9/nihms521020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f8/3844119/7cb1348ad8a9/nihms521020f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术中输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的短期影响:一项初步随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1997. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
2
Comparing surgical outcome and ovarian reserve after laparoscopic hysterectomy between two methods of with and without prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: A randomized controlled trial.比较腹腔镜子宫切除术中两种方法(预防性双侧输卵管切除术与非预防性双侧输卵管切除术)后的手术结局及卵巢储备功能:一项随机对照试验。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(3):543-548. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.193114.
3
Impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on anti-Müllerian hormone in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术中机会性输卵管切除术对抗苗勒管激素的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(2):314-320. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14182. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopausal women at low risk for ovarian cancer: risk-reducing or risky?低卵巢癌风险的绝经前女性预防性输卵管切除术:是降低风险还是带来风险?
Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1530-1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.039. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
5
The effect of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术后预防性双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响。
J Ovarian Res. 2021 Jun 29;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00825-w.
6
Does the addition of salpingectomy or fimbriectomy to hysterectomy in premenopausal patients compromise ovarian reserve? A prospective study.对于绝经前患者,子宫切除术中加做输卵管切除术或输卵管伞端切除术是否会损害卵巢储备功能?一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:270-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.025. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
7
The postreproductive salpingectomy.生殖后期输卵管切除术
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):e20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
8
3 to 5 Years Later: Long-term Effects of Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingectomy on Ovarian Function.3至5年后:预防性双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢功能的长期影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.833. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve and Function.一项评估机会性输卵管切除术对卵巢储备和功能影响的研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Feb;73(1):62-68. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01709-9. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
10
Reply of the authors.作者的回复。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):e21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.021. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic salpingectomy as a preventative strategy for ovarian cancer in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性输卵管切除术作为一般人群卵巢癌的预防策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e8. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e8.
2
Optimization of Timing for Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy and Oophorectomy.降低风险的输卵管切除术和卵巢切除术时机的优化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan 1;145(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005781. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
The Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopausal low-risk women for ovarian cancer: primum non nocere.预防性输卵管切除术在绝经前低危女性中的卵巢癌预防作用:首要原则是不造成伤害。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jun;129(3):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
2
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.
3
Risk-reducing salpingectomy as preventative strategy for pelvic serous cancer.
机会性输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):3296. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113296.
4
The Effect of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve Using Two Different Electrosurgical Instruments: Ultrasonic Shears Versus Bipolar Electrocautery.使用两种不同电外科器械行输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响:超声刀与双极电凝器对比
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59434. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Gynecological surgery in adulthood imparts cognitive and brain changes in rats: A focus on hysterectomy at short-, moderate-, and long-term intervals after surgery.成年期妇科手术对大鼠认知和大脑的影响:以手术后短期、中期和长期间隔行子宫切除术为例。
Horm Behav. 2023 Sep;155:105411. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105411. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
6
Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario.输卵管切除术与安大略省卵巢癌风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327198. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27198.
7
Association of Early Hysterectomy With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Korean Women.早期子宫切除术与韩国女性心血管疾病风险的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17145.
8
Possible Association of Hysterectomy Accompanied with Opportunistic Salpingectomy with Early Menopause: A Retrospective Cohort Study.子宫切除术伴随机输卵管切除术与早绝经的可能关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911871.
9
Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis.2011 年至 2016 年期间的机会性输卵管切除术:描述性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 May 31;10(2):E466-E475. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210219. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
10
Uptake and Predictors of Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction in the United States.美国降低卵巢癌风险的机会性输卵管切除术的接受情况和预测因素。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Dec;14(12):1101-1110. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0121. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
预防性输卵管切除术降低盆腹腔浆液性癌风险。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Mar;23(3):417-21. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182849dba.
4
Modeling age at menopause using serum concentration of anti-mullerian hormone.使用抗缪勒管激素的血清浓度来建模绝经年龄。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):729-35. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3176. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
5
The role of the fallopian tube in ovarian cancer.输卵管在卵巢癌中的作用。
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012 May;10(5):296-306.
6
Cancer statistics, 2012.癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
7
The post-reproductive Fallopian tube: better removed?绝经后输卵管:更好地切除?
Hum Reprod. 2011 Nov;26(11):2918-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der274. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
8
Serum antimüllerian hormone in healthy premenopausal women.健康绝经前妇女的血清抗缪勒管激素。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2718-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.051.
9
Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer--shifting the paradigm.上皮性卵巢癌的分子发病机制和卵巢外起源——改变模式。
Hum Pathol. 2011 Jul;42(7):918-31. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.03.003.
10
Effects of salpingectomy on ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization: a reappraisal.输卵管切除术对体外受精控制性卵巢超排卵中卵巢反应的影响:再评价。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2474-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.032. Epub 2011 Apr 6.