• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

除常规生育护理外实施在线临床健康社区的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面研究

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of an online clinical health community in addition to usual fertility care: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Aarts Johanna W M, Faber Marjan J, den Boogert Anne G, Cohlen Ben J, van der Linden Paul J Q, Kremer Jan A M, Nelen Willianne L D M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 30;15(8):e163. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2098.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.2098
PMID:23996964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3815434/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online health communities are becoming more popular in health care. Patients and professionals can communicate with one another online, patients can find peer support, and professionals can use it as an additional information channel to their patients. However, the implementation of online health communities into daily practice is challenging. These challenges relate to the fact that patients need to be activated to (1) become a member (ie, subscription) and (2) participate actively within the community before any effect can be expected. Therefore, we aimed at answering 2 research questions: (1) what factors are associated with subscription to an online health community, and (2) which are associated with becoming an active participant within an online health community.

OBJECTIVE

To identify barriers and facilitators as perceived by patients for the implementation of an online health community.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study. Three Dutch fertility clinics (2 IVF-licensed) offered their patients a secure online clinical health community through which clinicians can provide online information and patients can ask questions to the medical team or share experiences and find support from peers. We randomly selected and invited 278 men and women suffering from infertility and attending 1 of the participating clinics. Participants filled out a questionnaire about their background characteristics and current use of the online community. Possible barriers and facilitators were divided into 2 parts: (1) those for subscription to the community, and (2) those for active participation in the community. We performed 2 multivariate logistic regression analyses to calculate determinants for both subscription and active participation.

RESULTS

Subscription appeared to be associated with patients' background characteristics (eg, gender, treatment phase), intervention-related facilitators (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% CI 1.14-5.27), and patient-related barriers (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54), such as not feeling the need for such an online health community. After subscription, determinants for participation consisted of aspects related to participant's age (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97), length of infertility (OR 1.48, 05% CI 1.09-2.02), and to intervention-related facilitators (OR 5.79, 95% CI 2.40-13.98), such as its reliable character and possibility to interact with the medical team and peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing an online health community in addition to usual fertility care should be performed stepwise. At least 2 strategies are needed to increase the proportion of patient subscribers and consequently make them active participants. First, the marketing strategy should contain information tailored to different subgroups of the patient population. Second, for a living online health community, incorporation of interactive elements, as well as frequent news and updates are needed. These results imply that involving patients and their needs into the promotion strategy, community's design, and implementation are crucial.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5d/3815434/a2da1e4f8892/jmir_v15i8e163_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5d/3815434/a33c3c5aae05/jmir_v15i8e163_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5d/3815434/a2da1e4f8892/jmir_v15i8e163_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5d/3815434/a33c3c5aae05/jmir_v15i8e163_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5d/3815434/a2da1e4f8892/jmir_v15i8e163_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

在线健康社区在医疗保健领域越来越受欢迎。患者和专业人员可以在线相互交流,患者可以获得同伴支持,专业人员可以将其作为向患者提供额外信息的渠道。然而,将在线健康社区应用于日常实践具有挑战性。这些挑战与以下事实有关:在期望产生任何效果之前,需要促使患者(1)成为会员(即订阅),以及(2)在社区内积极参与。因此,我们旨在回答两个研究问题:(1)与订阅在线健康社区相关的因素有哪些,以及(2)与成为在线健康社区的活跃参与者相关的因素有哪些。

目的

确定患者所感知到的在线健康社区实施的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面研究。三家荷兰生育诊所(两家拥有体外受精许可证)为其患者提供了一个安全的在线临床健康社区,临床医生可以通过该社区提供在线信息,患者可以向医疗团队提问、分享经验并从同伴那里获得支持。我们随机选择并邀请了278名患有不孕症且在其中一家参与诊所就诊的男性和女性。参与者填写了一份关于他们的背景特征和当前对在线社区使用情况的问卷。可能的障碍和促进因素分为两部分:(1)与订阅社区相关的因素,以及(2)与积极参与社区相关的因素。我们进行了两项多变量逻辑回归分析,以计算订阅和积极参与的决定因素。

结果

订阅似乎与患者的背景特征(如性别、治疗阶段)、干预相关的促进因素(比值比[OR]2.45,95%置信区间1.14 - 5.27)以及患者相关的障碍(OR 0.20,95%置信区间0.08 - 0.54)有关,例如感觉不需要这样一个在线健康社区。订阅后,参与的决定因素包括与参与者年龄相关的方面(OR 0.86,95%置信区间0.76 - 0.97)、不孕时长(OR 1.48,95%置信区间1.09 - 2.02)以及干预相关的促进因素(OR 5.79,95%置信区间2.40 - 13.98),例如其可靠性以及与医疗团队和同伴互动的可能性。

结论

除了常规的生育护理外,逐步实施在线健康社区。至少需要两种策略来增加患者订阅者的比例,并进而使他们成为活跃参与者。首先,营销策略应包含针对患者群体不同亚组量身定制的信息。其次,对于一个有活力的在线健康社区,需要纳入互动元素以及频繁的新闻和更新。这些结果表明,将患者及其需求纳入推广策略、社区设计和实施至关重要。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of an online clinical health community in addition to usual fertility care: a cross-sectional study.除常规生育护理外实施在线临床健康社区的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 30;15(8):e163. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2098.
2
Positive experiences of patient-centred care are associated with intentions to comply with fertility treatment: findings from the validation of the Portuguese version of the PCQ-Infertility tool.以患者为中心的护理的积极体验与遵守生育治疗的意愿相关:验证葡萄牙语版 PCQ-不孕工具的发现。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2462-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det259. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
3
Infertility management in women and men attending primary care-patient characteristics, management actions and referrals.基层医疗中女性和男性不育管理-患者特征、管理措施和转诊。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):2173-2183. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez172.
4
Lessons learned from the implementation of an online infertility community into an IVF clinic's daily practice.将在线不孕不育社群融入试管婴儿诊所日常实践的经验教训。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015;18(4):238-47. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2015.1057901. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
5
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Improving patient-centredness in partnership with female patients: a cluster RCT in fertility care.改善与女性患者的以患者为中心的合作关系:生育护理中的集群 RCT。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1137-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev041. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
9
Exploring the facilitators and barriers to using an online infertility risk prediction tool (FoRECAsT) for young women with breast cancer: a qualitative study protocol.探索使用在线生育力风险预测工具(FoRECAsT)对年轻乳腺癌女性的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e033669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033669.
10
Improving the implementation of tailored expectant management in subfertile couples: protocol for a cluster randomized trial.提高不育夫妇个体化期待治疗实施效果的研究:一项整群随机对照试验方案
Implement Sci. 2013 May 20;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of perioperative Vaginally Administered estrogen in postmenopausal women undergoing prolapse surgery (EVA trial): study protocol for a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.经阴道给予雌激素在绝经后妇女脱垂手术中成本效益的研究(EVA 试验):一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Dec 31;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01587-9.
2
Mobilizing health district management teams through digital tools: Lessons from the District.Team initiative in Benin and Guinea using an action research methodology.通过数字工具调动卫生区管理团队:来自贝宁和几内亚地区团队倡议的经验教训,采用行动研究方法。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Aug 28;5(4):e10244. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10244. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Motivators and motivations to persist with online psychological interventions: a qualitative study of treatment completers.坚持在线心理干预的动机与动力:对完成治疗者的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 22;14(3):e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2100.
2
The medium is the (health) measure: patient engagement using personal technologies.媒介即(健康)衡量标准:利用个人技术促进患者参与。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Apr-Jun;35(2):109-17. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31824a235e.
3
Patient-focused internet interventions in reproductive medicine: a scoping review.
Web-Based Guidance Through Assisted Reproductive Technology (myFertiCare): Patient-Centered App Development and Qualitative Evaluation.基于网络的辅助生殖技术指导(myFertiCare):以患者为中心的应用程序开发和定性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 3;23(8):e25389. doi: 10.2196/25389.
4
Factors influencing sustainability of online platforms for professionals: a mixed-method study in OECD countries.影响专业人员在线平台可持续性的因素:经合组织国家的混合方法研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab063.
5
Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).两种保留阴道和子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术的评估:改良曼彻斯特手术(MM)和骶棘韧带子宫固定术(SSH),一项多中心随机非劣效性试验的研究方案(SAM研究)
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0749-7.
6
Mechanisms of Communicating Health Information Through Facebook: Implications for Consumer Health Information Technology Design.通过脸书传播健康信息的机制:对消费者健康信息技术设计的启示
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 11;18(8):e218. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5949.
7
VisOHC: Designing Visual Analytics for Online Health Communities.VisOHC:为在线健康社区设计可视化分析
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016 Jan;22(1):71-80. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467555.
8
Personal experiences and emotionality in health-related knowledge exchange in Internet forums: a randomized controlled field experiment comparing responses to facts vs personal experiences.互联网论坛中健康相关知识交流的个人经历与情感因素:一项比较事实性信息与个人经历回应的随机对照现场实验
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 4;16(12):e277. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3766.
9
An online health community for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a pilot study.一项针对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的在线健康社区:一项试点研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Nov 13;3(4):e60. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3736.
生殖医学中以患者为中心的互联网干预措施:范围综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):211-27. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr045. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
4
Factors influencing the use of a Web-based application for supporting the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study.影响使用基于网络的应用程序支持2型糖尿病患者自我护理的因素:一项纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 30;13(3):e71. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1603.
5
Bringing loyalty to e-Health: theory validation using three internet-delivered interventions.提升对电子健康的忠诚度:使用三种互联网干预措施进行理论验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 24;13(3):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1837.
6
Information seeking and social support in online health communities: impact on patients' perceived empathy.在线健康社区中的信息寻求和社会支持:对患者感知同理心的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):298-304. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058.
7
Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL.不孕不育患者生活质量与苦恼的关系:荷兰 FertiQoL 量表的验证性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2011 May;26(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der051. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
8
Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient's voice.以患者为中心的不孕不育护理:倾听患者声音的定性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):827-33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der022. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
9
Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study.为什么电子健康计划难以实施?一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 19;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6.
10
Adding an online community to an internet-mediated walking program. Part 2: strategies for encouraging community participation.将在线社区融入基于互联网的步行计划。第2部分:鼓励社区参与的策略。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 17;12(4):e72. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1339.