Feldsine Philip T, Montgomery-Fullerton Megan, Roa Nerie, Kaur Mandeep, Lienau Andrew H, Jucker Markus, Kerr David E
BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2013 Jul-Aug;96(4):776-80. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.cs2005_04.
The Assurance GDS Escherichia coli (E. col) O157:H7, AOAC Official Method 2005.04, has been modified to include a larger sample size of 375 g. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Ninety samples and controls, representing three foods, were analyzed. Results show no statistically detectable difference between the Assurance GDS E. coli O157:H7 assay and the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7, other than the low level of inoculation for leaf lettuce, for which the GDS gave noticeably higher recovery [difference in probability of detection between candidate methods (dPODc = +0.45)]. There were also suggestions of moderate differences (dPODc = +0.15 to +0.20) for ground beef and the high level of leaf lettuce, but the study size was too small to detect differences of this size. Results showed that the Assurance GDS E. coli O157:H7 method is equivalent to reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7.
“保证”GDS大肠杆菌(E. col)O157:H7检测方法(AOAC官方方法2005.04)已进行修改,将样本量增大到375克。开展了一项方法比较研究,以证明此修改后的方法与参考培养方法等效。对代表三种食品的90个样本和对照进行了分析。结果表明,“保证”GDS大肠杆菌O157:H7检测方法与参考培养方法在检测大肠杆菌O157:H7方面,除了生菜接种水平较低的情况(在此情况下GDS检测回收率明显更高,候选方法之间的检测概率差异[dPODc = +0.45])外,在统计学上未检测到差异。对于绞碎牛肉和高接种水平的生菜,也存在中等差异的迹象(dPODc = +0.15至+0.20),但研究样本量过小,无法检测到这种程度的差异。结果表明,“保证”GDS大肠杆菌O157:H7检测方法在检测大肠杆菌O157:H7方面与参考培养方法等效。