Feldsine Philip T, Montgomery-Fullerton Megan, Roa Nerie, Kaur Mandeep, Kerr David E, Lienau Andrew H, Jucker Markus
BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2013 Jul-Aug;96(4):781-5. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.cs2005_05_mod.
The Assurance GDS Shiga Toxin Genes (0157), AOAC Official MethodsM 2005.05, has been modified to include a larger sample size of 375 g. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Ninety samples and controls, representing three foods, were analyzed. Results show no statistically detectable difference between the Assurance GDS Escherichia coli O157:H7 assay and the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7, other than the low level of inoculation for leaf lettuce for which the GDS gave noticeably higher recovery [difference in Probability of Detection between candidate methods (dPODc = +0.45)]. There were also suggestions of moderate differences (dPODc = +0.15 to +0.20) for ground beef and the high level of leaf lettuce, but the study size was too small to detect differences of this size. Results showed that the Assurance GDS Shiga Toxin Genes (0157) method is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Shiga toxigenic E. coli O157:H7.
《保证GDS志贺毒素基因(0157)检测方法》(AOAC官方方法M 2005.05)已修订,将样本量增加至375克。开展了一项方法比较研究,以证明该修订方法与参考培养法等效。对代表三种食品的90个样本和对照进行了分析。结果表明,除了生菜接种量较低时保证GDS大肠杆菌O157:H7检测方法的回收率明显较高外[候选方法之间的检测概率差异(dPODc = +0.45)],在检测大肠杆菌O157:H7方面,保证GDS检测方法与参考培养法之间在统计学上没有可检测到的差异。对于绞碎牛肉和高接种量的生菜,也有中等差异的迹象(dPODc = +0.15至+0.20),但研究规模太小,无法检测到这种程度的差异。结果表明,保证GDS志贺毒素基因(0157)检测方法在检测产志贺毒素大肠杆菌O157:H7方面与参考培养法等效。