Crocker Tom, Young John, Forster Anne, Brown Lesley, Ozer Seline, Greenwood Darren C
Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Age Ageing. 2013 Nov;42(6):682-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft133. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
the worldwide population is ageing. One expected consequence of this is an increase in morbidity and an associated increased demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects in residents of long-term care facilities.
to examine the effects of physical rehabilitation on activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. We included studies that compared the effect of a physical rehabilitation intervention on independence in ADL with either no intervention or an alternative intervention in older people (over 60 years) living in long-term care facilities. We searched 19 databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently screened papers and extracted data. Outcomes of included studies were combined in a standardised mean difference random-effects meta-analysis.
thirteen of 14 studies identified were included in the meta-analysis. Independence in ADL was improved by 0.24 standard units (95% CI: 0.11-0.38; P = 0.0005). This is equivalent to 1.3 points on the Barthel Index (0-20 scale). No significant differences in effect were found based on participant or intervention characteristics. Larger sample size and low attrition were associated with smaller estimates of effect. All studies were assessed to be at risk of bias.
physical rehabilitation may improve independence for elderly long-term care facility residents, but mean effects are small. It is unclear which interventions are most appropriate.
全球人口正在老龄化。由此产生的一个预期后果是发病率上升以及对长期护理的需求相应增加。身体康复对老年人有益,但对于长期护理机构居民的效果了解相对较少。
研究身体康复对长期护理机构老年居民日常生活活动(ADL)的影响。
对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们纳入了比较身体康复干预对长期护理机构中60岁以上老年人ADL独立性的影响与无干预或替代干预效果的研究。我们检索了19个数据库,包括Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、AMED、Web of Knowledge和谷歌学术。两名研究人员独立筛选论文并提取数据。纳入研究的结果在标准化均数差随机效应荟萃分析中进行合并。
纳入荟萃分析的14项研究中有13项。ADL独立性提高了0.24个标准单位(95%CI:0.11 - 0.38;P = 0.0005)。这相当于巴氏指数(0 - 20分制)上的1.3分。根据参与者或干预特征未发现效果有显著差异。样本量较大和损耗率较低与较小的效应估计值相关。所有研究均被评估存在偏倚风险。
身体康复可能会提高长期护理机构老年居民的独立性,但平均效果较小。尚不清楚哪种干预措施最合适。