• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便免疫化学检测的使用缩小了当前肠癌筛查计划在性别、年龄和贫困方面的参与差距。

Use of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programme.

机构信息

Scottish Bowel Screening Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2013 Jun;20(2):80-5. doi: 10.1177/0969141313497197. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1177/0969141313497197
PMID:24009088
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the characteristics of participants screened for bowel cancer using a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT).

SETTING

Scottish Bowel Screening Programme.

METHODS

65909 men and women in two NHS Boards, aged 50 to 74, were invited to participate in an evaluation of FIT as a first-line test. Uptake was calculated by sex, age in quintiles, and deprivation in quintiles, and compared with a group who had completed a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and for whom details of sex, age and deprivation were well documented.

RESULTS

FIT kits from 38672 participants were tested. The overall uptake of 58.7% was significantly higher than the 53.9% for gFOBT (p < 0.0001). Uptakes in the two NHS Boards were 57.6% and 54.4% for men and 63.2% and 59.1% for women, higher than the 49.5% and 58.1% completing gFOBT. Uptake was higher for FIT than gFOBT in all age and deprivation quintiles for both men and women in both NHS Boards. The difference in uptake fell with age for men but rose for women; the increase in uptake was greater for men than women. Uptake fell as deprivation decreased for both sexes, and was similar in both NHS Boards.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of FIT increases uptake over gFOBT, and the greatest increases are seen in men, younger participants, and more deprived individuals, groups for which an increase in uptake is likely to be beneficial. The results support a move to FIT as a first-line screening test for those countries still using gFOBT.

摘要

目的

调查使用粪便血红蛋白免疫化学检测(FIT)筛查肠癌的参与者的特点。

背景

苏格兰肠癌筛查计划。

方法

在两个国民保健署(NHS)辖区内,邀请了 65909 名年龄在 50 至 74 岁的男性和女性参加 FIT 作为一线检测的评估。通过性别、五分位年龄和五分位贫困率计算参与率,并与一组已完成愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)且性别、年龄和贫困率详细资料记录良好的人群进行比较。

结果

共检测了 38672 名参与者的 FIT 试剂盒。总体参与率为 58.7%,明显高于 gFOBT 的 53.9%(p<0.0001)。两个 NHS 辖区的男性参与率分别为 57.6%和 54.4%,女性为 63.2%和 59.1%,高于完成 gFOBT 的 49.5%和 58.1%。在两个 NHS 辖区内,男性和女性在所有年龄和贫困五分位中,FIT 的参与率均高于 gFOBT。对于男性,随着年龄的增长,FIT 的参与率高于 gFOBT,但对于女性则相反;男性的参与率上升幅度大于女性。对于男性和女性,参与率随着贫困程度的降低而降低,且在两个 NHS 辖区内相似。

结论

使用 FIT 可提高 gFOBT 的参与率,对于男性、年轻参与者和贫困程度较高的人群,参与率的增加幅度最大,这可能对这些人群有益。这些结果支持将 FIT 作为那些仍在使用 gFOBT 的国家的一线筛查检测方法。

相似文献

1
Use of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programme.粪便免疫化学检测的使用缩小了当前肠癌筛查计划在性别、年龄和贫困方面的参与差距。
J Med Screen. 2013 Jun;20(2):80-5. doi: 10.1177/0969141313497197. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
2
Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England.粪便免疫化学试验增加结直肠癌筛查的检出率和改善结局:英格兰国家筛查计划中一项试点研究的结果。
Gut. 2017 Sep;66(9):1631-1644. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310691. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
3
Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)肠癌筛查项目中,与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验相比,不同阳性阈值下粪便免疫化学检测的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 27;7(10):e017186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017186.
4
Gender-specific cut-offs in colorectal cancer screening with FIT: Increased compliance and equal positivity rate.基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查中性别特异性截止值:更高的依从性和相等的阳性率。
J Med Screen. 2019 Jun;26(2):92-97. doi: 10.1177/0969141318804843. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Interval cancers in a national colorectal screening programme based on faecal immunochemical testing: Implications for faecal haemoglobin concentration threshold and sex inequality.基于粪便免疫化学检测的全国性结直肠癌筛查项目中的间期癌:对粪便血红蛋白浓度阈值及性别不平等的影响
J Med Screen. 2024 Mar;31(1):21-27. doi: 10.1177/09691413231188252. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Experience with a two-tier reflex gFOBT/FIT strategy in a national bowel screening programme.在全国性的肠道筛查计划中采用双层反射式 gFOBT/FIT 策略的经验。
J Med Screen. 2012 Mar;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.011098. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
7
Impact of changing from a guaiac faecal occult blood test to a faecal immunochemical test in a national screening programme: Results from a pilot study within the national bowel cancer screening programme in England.在全国范围内的筛查项目中,从愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(guaiac faecal occult blood test)转变为粪便免疫化学试验(faecal immunochemical test)的影响:英格兰全国肠癌筛查项目内的一项试点研究结果。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):426-432. doi: 10.1177/09691413211013376. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test.影响粪便潜血检测依从性的因素:粪便免疫化学检测与愈创木脂粪便潜血检测的聚类随机研究。
J Med Screen. 2011;18(3):135-41. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.010147.
9
Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.在一项有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划中,免疫化学粪便潜血试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验的纵向依从性比较。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 May;12(5):327-334. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0091. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.粪便免疫化学试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验:临床医生和结直肠癌筛查计划组织者需要了解的内容。
Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1327-37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool.常见的结直肠癌筛查障碍及有益的解决方案有哪些?一项为规划支持工具制定干预内容的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 5;12(9):e062738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738.
2
What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?从表现优异的筛查项目中,我们可以学到哪些经验来提高澳大利亚的结直肠癌筛查参与率?
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221121383. doi: 10.1177/10732748221121383.
3
Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review.
大规模邮寄粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查外展项目的患者选择:系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):379-388. doi: 10.1177/0969141321997482. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Implementation Strategies for Interventions Aiming to Increase Participation in Mail-Out Bowel Cancer Screening Programs: A Realist Review.旨在提高邮寄式肠癌筛查项目参与率的干预措施实施策略:一项实效主义综述
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 29;10:543732. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.543732. eCollection 2020.
5
A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK.英国结直肠癌发病率、筛查率、诊断途径、癌症分期和生存率的性别差异综述。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7.
6
Sociodemographic characteristics of nonparticipants in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study.丹麦结直肠癌筛查项目未参与者的社会人口学特征:一项全国性横断面研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 27;9:345-354. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S139168. eCollection 2017.
7
Long-Term Prediction of the Demand of Colonoscopies Generated by a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划产生的结肠镜检查需求的长期预测。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0164666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164666. eCollection 2016.
8
Effects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (ASCEND): four cluster-randomised controlled trials.基于证据的策略对降低英国国民健康服务体系肠癌筛查项目(ASCEND)中社会经济摄取梯度的影响:四项整群随机对照试验
Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):751-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01154-X. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.不参与北爱尔兰肠癌筛查计划的原因:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 9;5(9):e008266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008266.
10
Improving uptake of screening for colorectal cancer: a study on invitation strategies and different test kit use.提高结直肠癌筛查的接受度:一项关于邀请策略和不同检测试剂盒使用情况的研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;27(5):536-43. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000314.