• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族和民族在私人长期护理保险拥有中的作用。

Role of race and ethnicity in private long-term care insurance ownership.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Health Policy and Outcomes Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2014 Dec;54(6):1001-12. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt102. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnt102
PMID:24009168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4271104/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist in the ownership of private long-term care insurance (LTCI) among current Medicare beneficiaries.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This study used the 2011 wave of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to isolate the independent effects of race/ethnicity on LTCI uptake. Stratified multivariate analyses were used to further examine the effect of race/ethnicity on LTCI ownership.

RESULTS

12.3% of Blacks and 5.8% of Hispanics, compared with 20.2% of Whites (p < .001), reported having LTCI coverage. We found that Hispanics were 48% less likely to have LTCI (p = .005) compared with Whites, whereas no difference was found between Blacks and Whites. Compared with White women, Hispanic women were 81% less likely to be insured (p < .001). Ethnic disparities persisted among individuals who, based on income and assets, are considered appropriate for purchasing private LTCI coverage.

IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrates that ethnic differences exist in the ownership of LTCI among elderly Americans. Additional research is needed to determine what factors are responsible for the apparent underrepresentation of Hispanics in the LTCI market.

摘要

研究目的

确定在当前的 Medicare 受益人群中,私人长期护理保险(LTCI)的拥有情况是否存在种族/民族差异。

设计和方法

本研究使用了 2011 年全国健康老龄化趋势研究的资料。采用双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归来分离种族/民族对 LTCI 参保的独立影响。采用分层多变量分析进一步研究种族/民族对 LTCI 所有权的影响。

结果

12.3%的黑人( Blacks )和 5.8%的西班牙裔( Hispanics ),与 20.2%的白人( Whites )(p <.001)相比,报告拥有 LTCI 覆盖范围。我们发现,与白人相比,西班牙裔拥有 LTCI 的可能性低 48%(p =.005),而黑人与白人之间没有差异。与白人女性相比,西班牙裔女性的保险可能性低 81%(p <.001)。在那些根据收入和资产被认为适合购买私人 LTCI 保险的人群中,仍然存在族裔差异。

意义

本研究表明,在老年美国人中,LTCI 的拥有情况存在种族差异。需要进一步研究确定是什么因素导致西班牙裔在 LTCI 市场中的明显代表性不足。

相似文献

1
Role of race and ethnicity in private long-term care insurance ownership.种族和民族在私人长期护理保险拥有中的作用。
Gerontologist. 2014 Dec;54(6):1001-12. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt102. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
2
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.
3
Racial-ethnic disparities in use of antidepressants in private coverage: implications for the Affordable Care Act.私人医保中抗抑郁药使用的种族差异:对《平价医疗法案》的影响
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Sep 1;65(9):1140-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300182.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Meeting MTM Eligibility Criteria Based on Star Ratings Compared with the Medicare Modernization Act.基于星级评定与《医疗保险现代化法案》相比,在符合 MTM 资格标准方面的种族和民族差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):97-107. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.97.
5
Will health care reform reduce disparities in insurance coverage?: Evidence from the dependent coverage mandate.医疗改革能否缩小保险覆盖范围的差距?:从依赖型保险覆盖要求的角度来看。
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):528-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000134.
6
A current re-examination of racial/ethnic disparities in the use of substance abuse treatment: Do disparities persist?当前对药物滥用治疗中种族/民族差异的重新审视:差异是否仍然存在?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Sep 1;202:162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
The contribution of insurance coverage and community resources to reducing racial/ethnic disparities in access to care.保险覆盖范围和社区资源对减少就医机会方面种族/族裔差异的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):809-29. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00148.
8
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: trends in racial/ethnic, income, and insurance disparities over time, 2002-2009.美国儿童和青少年保健年度报告:2002-2009 年种族/民族、收入和保险差异的变化趋势
Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
9
Preventive care utilization among the uninsured by race/ethnicity and income.不同种族/族裔和收入水平的无保险人群的预防保健利用率。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
10
Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Status Despite Medicare and Medicaid Insurance.尽管有医疗保险和医疗补助保险,但社会经济地位对乳腺癌生存的差异。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):706-754. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12355.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement in Non-Medical End-of-Life Planning by Older Adults.老年人参与非医疗临终规划。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Oct;62(4):805-812. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Private Long-Term Care Insurance Decision: The Role of Income, Risk Propensity, Personality, and Life Experience.个人长期护理保险决策:收入、风险倾向、个性和生活经历的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;9(1):102. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010102.
3
Residential care in Los Angeles: Evaluating the spatial distribution of facilities and neighbourhood access to care among older adults.洛杉矶的居家护理:评估养老设施的空间分布以及老年人获得护理服务的社区可达性。
Local Environ. 2019;24(3):274-288. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2018.1564254. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Does COVID-2019 have an Impact on the Purchase Intention of Commercial Long-Term Care Insurance among the Elderly in China?新型冠状病毒肺炎对中国老年人商业长期护理保险购买意愿有影响吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 6;8(2):126. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020126.
5
Who Wants Long-Term Care Insurance? A Stated Preference Survey of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Characteristics.谁需要长期护理保险?一项关于态度、信念和特征的陈述偏好调查。
Inquiry. 2016 Aug 16;53. doi: 10.1177/0046958016663728. Print 2016.
6
The Impact of Consumer Numeracy on the Purchase of Long-Term Care Insurance.消费者数字素养对长期护理保险购买的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):1612-31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12439. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.私人信息的多个维度:来自长期护理保险市场的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Sep;96(4):938-58.
2
After CLASS: the long-term care commission's search for a solution.课后:长期护理委员会寻求解决方案。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):831-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0373.
3
Long-term care insurance demand limited by beliefs about needs, concerns about insurers, and care available from family.长期护理保险需求受对需求的信念、对保险公司的担忧以及家庭提供的护理的限制。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1294-302. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1307.
4
Private long-term care insurance: value to claimants and implications for long-term care financing.私人长期护理保险:对索赔人的价值及其对长期护理融资的影响。
Gerontologist. 2010 Oct;50(5):613-22. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq021. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
5
Elderly hispanics more likely to reside in poor-quality nursing homes.西班牙裔老年人更有可能居住在护理质量较差的养老院。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):65-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0003.
6
The Private Market for Long-Term Care Insurance in the U.S.: A Review of the Evidence.美国长期护理保险的私人市场:证据综述
J Risk Insur. 2009 Feb 10;76(1):5-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01286.x.
7
Cultural values and caregiver preference for Mexican-American and non-Latino White elders.墨西哥裔美国人和非拉丁裔白人老年人的文化价值观与照料者偏好
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2009 Sep;24(3):225-39. doi: 10.1007/s10823-008-9088-0. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
8
Why don't people buy long-term-care insurance?为什么人们不购买长期护理保险?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Jul;61(4):S185-93. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.4.s185.
9
Explaining racial and ethnic disparities in health care.解释医疗保健中的种族和民族差异。
Med Care. 2006 May;44(5 Suppl):I64-72. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000208195.83749.c3.
10
The role of health insurance coverage in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in health care.医疗保险覆盖范围在减少医疗保健领域种族/族裔差异方面的作用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):398-408. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.398.