• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私人信息的多个维度:来自长期护理保险市场的证据。

Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Department of Economics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Am Econ Rev. 2006 Sep;96(4):938-58.

PMID:29135205
Abstract

We demonstrate the existence of multiple dimensions of private information in the long-term care insurance market. Two types of people purchase insurance: individuals with private information that they are high risk and individuals with private information that they have strong taste for insurance. Ex post, the former are higher risk than insurance companies expect, while the latter are lower risk. In aggregate, those with more insurance are not higher risk. Our results demonstrate that insurance markets may suffer from asymmetric information even absent a positive correlation between insurance coverage and risk occurrence. The results also suggest a general test for asymmetric information.

摘要

我们证明了长期护理保险市场中存在多种私人信息维度。有两种人购买保险:一种是有私人信息的人,他们是高风险的;另一种是有私人信息的人,他们对保险有强烈的偏好。事后看来,前者的风险高于保险公司的预期,而后者的风险则低于保险公司的预期。总的来说,那些购买保险更多的人并不是更高风险的人。我们的结果表明,即使保险覆盖范围和风险发生之间没有正相关关系,保险市场也可能存在信息不对称。这些结果还表明了一种用于检验信息不对称的一般方法。

相似文献

1
Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.私人信息的多个维度:来自长期护理保险市场的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Sep;96(4):938-58.
2
Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.私人信息的多维性:来自长期护理保险市场的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Sep 1;96(4):938-958. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.4.938.
3
The use of nursing home and assisted living facilities among private long-term care insurance claimants: the experience of disabled elders.私立长期护理保险索赔者中养老院和辅助生活设施的使用情况:残疾老年人的经历
Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2002 Spring(10):1-6.
4
Medical Underwriting In Long-Term Care Insurance: Market Conditions Limit Options For Higher-Risk Consumers.长期护理保险中的医疗核保:市场状况限制了高风险消费者的选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1494-503. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1133.
5
Understanding the motivations of long-term care insurance owners: the importance of retirement planning.了解长期护理保险所有者的动机:退休规划的重要性。
Benefits Q. 2002;18(2):16-21.
6
The impact of private long-term care insurance on the use of long-term care.私人长期护理保险对长期护理使用情况的影响。
Inquiry. 2011 Spring;48(1):34-50. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.01.05.
7
Long-term care financing: lessons from France.长期护理融资:法国的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):359-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12125.
8
Long-term care over an uncertain future: what can current retirees expect?在不确定的未来提供长期护理:当前的退休人员能期待什么?
Inquiry. 2005;42(4):335-50. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.4.335.
9
Risky business: long-term care insurance underwriting.风险业务:长期护理保险承保
Inquiry. 1995 Fall;32(3):271-84.
10
Long-term care and the private insurance market.长期护理与私人保险市场。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1995 Jul(163):1-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Shaping Long-term Care Insurance Intentions Among Chinese Adults Aged 50-70: Role of Information Interventions in Health Risks.塑造50-70岁中国成年人的长期护理保险意愿:信息干预在健康风险中的作用
Innov Aging. 2025 May 24;9(6):igaf054. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf054. eCollection 2025.
2
Moral hazard and long-term care insurance.道德风险与长期护理保险
Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract. 2019 Apr;44(2):231-251. doi: 10.1057/s41288-018-00119-1. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
3
Effects of long-term care insurance on financial well-being.长期护理保险对财务状况的影响。
Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract. 2019 Apr;44(2):277-302. doi: 10.1057/s41288-018-00113-7. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Factors influencing the demand for individual voluntary private health insurance in Iran.影响伊朗个人自愿购买私人医疗保险需求的因素。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Mar 17;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00609-9.
5
Residents' Cognition, Attitudes, and Intentions to Participate in Long-Term Care Insurance: Moderating Effect of Policy Support.居民参与长期护理保险的认知、态度和意愿:政策支持的调节作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 2;14(10):895. doi: 10.3390/bs14100895.
6
The Health Costs of Cost Sharing.成本分摊的健康成本。
Q J Econ. 2024 May 3;139(4):2037-2082. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjae015. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Demand heterogeneity in insurance markets: Implications for equity and efficiency.保险市场中的需求异质性:对公平与效率的影响。
Quant Econom. 2017 Nov;8(3):929-975. doi: 10.3982/qe794. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Driving factors and micro-mechanism of residents' participation intention in individual pension system.居民参与个人养老金制度的驱动因素及微观机制
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):e24488. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24488. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
9
Lapses in Long-Term Care Insurance.长期护理保险中的失误。
J Risk Insur. 2023 Sep;90(3):569-595. doi: 10.1111/jori.12425. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
10
Family spillovers and long-term care insurance.家庭溢出效应与长期护理保险。
J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;90:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102781. Epub 2023 Jun 12.