Jabur G N S, Willcox T W, Zahidani S H, Sidhu K, Mitchell S J
Green Lane Clinical Perfusion, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Perfusion. 2014 May;29(3):219-25. doi: 10.1177/0267659113504445. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
To compare the efficiency of 20 and 40 µm arterial line filters during cardiopulmonary bypass for the removal of emboli from the extracorporeal circuit.
Twenty-four adult patients undergoing surgery were perfused using a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit containing either a 20 µm or 40 µm arterial filter (n = 12 in both groups). The Emboli Detection and Classification system was used to count emboli upstream and downstream of the filter throughout cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean proportion of emboli removed by the filter was compared between the groups.
The 20 µm filter removed a significantly greater proportion of incoming emboli (0.621) than the 40 µm filter (0.334) (p=0.029). The superiority of the 20 µm filter persisted across all size groups of emboli larger than the pore size of the 40 µm filter.
The 20 µm filter removed substantially more emboli than the 40 µm filter during cardiopulmonary bypass in this comparison.
比较20微米和40微米动脉滤器在体外循环期间从体外循环中清除栓子的效率。
24例接受手术的成年患者使用包含20微米或40微米动脉滤器的体外循环回路进行灌注(两组各12例)。在整个体外循环过程中,使用栓子检测和分类系统对滤器上游和下游的栓子进行计数。比较两组之间滤器清除栓子的平均比例。
20微米滤器清除的进入栓子比例(0.621)显著高于40微米滤器(0.334)(p = 0.029)。在所有大于40微米滤器孔径的栓子尺寸组中,20微米滤器的优势持续存在。
在此比较中,20微米滤器在体外循环期间清除的栓子比40微米滤器多得多。