• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Oncology Nursing Minimum Data Set (ONMDS): can we hypothesize a set of prevalent Nursing Sensitive Outcomes (NSO) in cancer patients?肿瘤护理最小数据集(ONMDS):我们能否假设一组癌症患者中普遍存在的护理敏感结局(NSO)?
Ecancermedicalscience. 2013 Sep 2;7:345. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.345. eCollection 2013.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Hidden outpatient oncology clinical nursing minimum data set: findings from an Italian multi-method study.隐藏的门诊肿瘤临床护理最小数据集:来自意大利多方法研究的结果。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Aug;17(4):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Assessment of oral mucositis in adult and pediatric oncology patients: an evidence-based approach.成人及儿科肿瘤患者口腔黏膜炎的评估:循证方法
ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2010 Summer;28(3):8-15.
9
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
10
A Canadian nursing minimum data set: a major priority.加拿大护理最低数据集:一项主要优先事项。
Can J Nurs Adm. 1993 May-Jun;6(2):7-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Gamification as an Educational Approach for Oncological Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review.游戏化作为肿瘤患者的一种教育方法:一项系统的范围综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;11(24):3116. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243116.
2
What Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes Have Been Investigated to Date among Patients with Solid and Hematological Malignancies? A Scoping Review.迄今为止,在实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中研究了哪些护理敏感结局?一项范围综述。
Nurs Rep. 2023 Aug 15;13(3):1101-1125. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030096.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the intensity of nursing care: making use of the Belgian Nursing Minimum Data Set.衡量护理强度:利用比利时护理最小数据集。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Jul;45(7):1011-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
2
Variations across field settings in the use of the indicators for nursing outcomes classification outcomes.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:758-60.
3
[The written nursing reports].[书面护理报告]
Assist Inferm Ric. 2006 Apr-Jun;25(2):109-14.
4
The effects of nurse staffing on adverse events, morbidity, mortality, and medical costs.护士人员配备对不良事件、发病率、死亡率和医疗成本的影响。
Nurs Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;52(2):71-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200303000-00003.
5
Classifying nursing-sensitive patient outcomes.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1996 Winter;28(4):295-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1996.tb00377.x.
6
Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice.迈向护理语言的标准分类方案:美国护士协会支持临床护理实践数据库指导委员会的建议
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):421-7. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153431.
7
The Nursing Minimum Data Set: abstraction tool for standardized, comparable, essential data.护理最低数据集:用于标准化、可比较的基本数据的提取工具。
Am J Public Health. 1991 Apr;81(4):421-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.4.421.

肿瘤护理最小数据集(ONMDS):我们能否假设一组癌症患者中普遍存在的护理敏感结局(NSO)?

Oncology Nursing Minimum Data Set (ONMDS): can we hypothesize a set of prevalent Nursing Sensitive Outcomes (NSO) in cancer patients?

作者信息

Milani A, Mauri S, Gandini S, Magon G

机构信息

European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Ecancermedicalscience. 2013 Sep 2;7:345. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.345. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2013.345
PMID:24009644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3757958/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nursing minimum data set (NMDS) was created in 1977 in the United States to collect uniform standardised data that could be comparable among different nursing areas or patients. So far, in the literature, an NMDS in an oncology setting has not yet been described. Considering an oncology nursing minimum data set (ONMDS), which data could be chosen to define this tool regarding cancer patient care?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

At the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), 20 experienced oncology nurses representing surgical, medical, and critical areas participated in a nursing record working group. All nurses followed an educational course on NMDS, and they shared clinical experiences to find which data common among different areas could be useful to care. To identify these data, nurses considered three issues: what is nursing care for nurses in the IEO? What is the nurses' responsibility in the IEO? What is the organisational nursing model in the IEO? Nurses in the IEO are autonomous in decision making and recognised by patients and by a multi-professional team; the organisational nursing model is primary nursing with patient-centred care. Nursing data must therefore show the quality and results of this care. With this in mind, the working group decided to orient the ONMDS toward nursing-sensitive outcomes (NSOs), meeting also with psychologists, physiotherapists, and dieticians. Nurses analysed Oncology Nursing Society outcomes, and through focus groups, experiential meetings, role playing, and case studies, they integrated them with other NSOs.

RESULTS

The ONMDS is composed of 49 NSOs recognised as the most common and frequent oncologic outcomes regardless of the treatment that the patient undergoes. These outcomes were clustered into 15 categories. The categories are: gastrointestinal outcomes, genitourinary outcomes, respiratory outcomes, skin outcomes, fluid and electrolyte balance outcomes, neurological outcomes, security, functional status, vascular access outcomes, nutritional status, pain, psychosocial discomfort, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities daily living (IADL), and self-care outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to identify an ONMDS based on NSOs allow us to develop an tool that can standardise language, assessment, and intervention, but overall could be used to measure nursing care. To evaluate these potentialities, the ONMDS was introduced into nursing records, and it was tested with a pre-post research study.

摘要

背景

护理最小数据集(NMDS)于1977年在美国创建,用于收集可在不同护理领域或患者之间进行比较的统一标准化数据。到目前为止,文献中尚未描述肿瘤学环境中的NMDS。考虑到肿瘤护理最小数据集(ONMDS),可以选择哪些数据来定义这个关于癌症患者护理的工具呢?

材料与方法

在欧洲肿瘤研究所(IEO),20名来自外科、内科和重症领域的经验丰富的肿瘤护士参加了护理记录工作组。所有护士都参加了关于NMDS的培训课程,他们分享临床经验,以找出不同领域中共同的数据,这些数据可能对护理有用。为了确定这些数据,护士们考虑了三个问题:IEO护士的护理工作是什么?IEO护士的职责是什么?IEO的组织护理模式是什么?IEO的护士在决策方面是自主的,并得到患者和多专业团队的认可;组织护理模式是以患者为中心的初级护理。因此,护理数据必须显示这种护理的质量和结果。考虑到这一点,工作组决定将ONMDS导向护理敏感结局(NSO),并与心理学家、物理治疗师和营养师进行了会面。护士们分析了肿瘤护理协会的结局,并通过焦点小组、经验交流会、角色扮演和案例研究,将它们与其他NSO整合在一起。

结果

ONMDS由49个NSO组成,这些NSO被认为是最常见和最频繁出现的肿瘤学结局,无论患者接受何种治疗。这些结局被归为15个类别。这些类别是:胃肠道结局、泌尿生殖系统结局、呼吸系统结局、皮肤结局、液体和电解质平衡结局、神经学结局、安全性、功能状态、血管通路结局、营养状况、疼痛、心理社会不适、日常生活活动(ADL)、日常生活工具性活动(IADL)和自我护理结局。

结论

基于NSO确定ONMDS的努力使我们能够开发一种工具,该工具可以标准化语言、评估和干预,但总体上可用于衡量护理质量。为了评估这些潜力,ONMDS被引入护理记录中,并通过前后研究进行了测试。