• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外主动脉人工瓣膜中多普勒与导管梯度之间的差异。局部梯度和压力恢复的一种表现。

Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery.

作者信息

Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G

机构信息

Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.

出版信息

Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1467-75. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1467.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1467
PMID:2401075
Abstract

To evaluate possible causes of discrepancy between Doppler and catheter gradients across prosthetic valves, five sizes (19-27 mm) of St. Jude and Hancock valves were studied in an aortic pulsatile flow model. Catheter gradients at multiple sites distal to the valve were compared with simultaneously obtained Doppler gradients. In the St. Jude valve, significant differences between Doppler and catheter gradients measured 30 mm downstream from the valve were found: Doppler gradients exceeded peak catheter gradients of 10 mm Hg or more by 81 +/- 35% (15 +/- 3.6 mm Hg), and mean catheter gradients by 71 +/- 11% (10.3 +/- 2.5 mm Hg). When the catheter was pulled back through the tunnel-like central orifice of the valve, high localized gradients at the valve plane and significant early pressure recovery were found. When the catheter was pulled back through the large side orifices, gradients at the same level were only 46 +/- 6% of the central orifice gradients (mean difference, 7.6 +/- 4.5 mm Hg). Doppler peak and mean gradients showed excellent agreement with the highest central orifice catheter gradients (mean difference, 1.0 +/- 3.1 and 0.9 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, respectively). A significantly better agreement between Doppler and catheter gradients at 30 mm was found for the Hancock valve, although Doppler peak and mean gradients were still slightly greater than catheter gradients. Doppler gradients exceeded catheter gradients by 18 +/- 10% (3.4 +/- 1.9 mm Hg) and 13 +/- 11% (2.1 +/- 0.9 mm Hg), respectively. When the catheter was pulled back through the valve, the highest gradients were found approximately 20 mm distal to the valve ring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为评估人工心脏瓣膜跨瓣多普勒与心导管压力阶差不一致的可能原因,在主动脉搏动血流模型中研究了5种尺寸(19 - 27 mm)的圣犹达(St. Jude)瓣膜和汉考克(Hancock)瓣膜。将瓣膜远端多个部位的心导管压力阶差与同步获取的多普勒压力阶差进行比较。在圣犹达瓣膜中,发现瓣膜下游30 mm处测量的多普勒与心导管压力阶差存在显著差异:多普勒压力阶差超过心导管峰值压力阶差10 mmHg或更多达81±35%(15±3.6 mmHg),超过心导管平均压力阶差达71±11%(10.3±2.5 mmHg)。当导管经瓣膜隧道样中心孔回撤时,在瓣膜平面发现高局部压力阶差及显著的早期压力恢复。当导管经大侧孔回撤时,同一水平的压力阶差仅为中心孔压力阶差的46±6%(平均差值7.6±4.5 mmHg)。多普勒峰值和平均压力阶差与中心孔最高心导管压力阶差显示出极佳的一致性(平均差值分别为1.0±3.1和0.9±1.5 mmHg)。对于汉考克瓣膜,在30 mm处多普勒与心导管压力阶差之间的一致性明显更好,尽管多普勒峰值和平均压力阶差仍略高于心导管压力阶差。多普勒压力阶差分别超过心导管压力阶差18±10%(3.4±1.9 mmHg)和13±11%(2.1±0.9 mmHg)。当导管经瓣膜回撤时,最高压力阶差出现在瓣膜环远端约20 mm处。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery.体外主动脉人工瓣膜中多普勒与导管梯度之间的差异。局部梯度和压力恢复的一种表现。
Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1467-75. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1467.
2
Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves.人工主动脉瓣设计对多普勒-心导管梯度相关性的影响:正常圣犹达、美敦力-霍尔、斯塔尔-爱德华兹和汉考克瓣膜的体外研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Feb;19(2):324-32. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90486-7.
3
Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: an in vivo and in vitro study.用多普勒超声心动图评估人工主动脉瓣的有效瓣口面积:一项体内和体外研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Aug;122(2):287-95. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.115161.
4
Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study.人工瓣膜口面积的多普勒评估:一项体外研究
Circulation. 1992 Jun;85(6):2275-83. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.6.2275.
5
Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position.双叶心脏瓣膜假体中的压力恢复。中心孔和侧孔处的局部高速和梯度及其对主动脉和二尖瓣位置的多普勒-导管梯度关系的影响。
Circulation. 1995 Dec 15;92(12):3464-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3464.
6
[Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical].新型索林双叶瓣碳酸氢盐机械瓣膜假体与圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜假体的多普勒超声心动图评估
G Ital Cardiol. 1994 Jun;24(6):733-43.
7
Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.机械主动脉瓣假体的多普勒评估:瓣膜设计及主动脉大小的影响
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Sep;13(5):823-30.
8
Aortic prosthetic valve design and size: relation to Doppler echocardiographic findings and pressure recovery- an in vitro study.主动脉人工瓣膜设计与尺寸:与多普勒超声心动图检查结果及压力恢复的关系——一项体外研究
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Jan;13(1):39-50.
9
Effect of prosthetic valve malfunction on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation for bileaflet aortic valve prostheses.人工瓣膜功能障碍对双叶主动脉瓣人工瓣膜多普勒-导管梯度关系的影响。
Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1320-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1320.
10
Doppler-catheter discrepancies in patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses or bioprostheses in the aortic valve position.主动脉瓣位双叶机械瓣膜或生物瓣膜患者的多普勒导管差异
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 15;102(10):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
From invasive gradients to pressure recovery: rethinking long-standing paradigms.从侵入性梯度到压力恢复:重新思考长期以来的范式。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Apr 21;21(8):e382-e384. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00065.
2
Non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pressure recovery distance after aortic valve stenosis.经主动脉瓣狭窄压力恢复距离的无创心血管磁共振评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Jan 30;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00914-3.
3
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Thrombosis and Literature Review.生物人工主动脉瓣血栓形成及文献综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Aug 6;9(8):252. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080252.
4
Comparison of performance of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.自膨胀式与球囊扩张式经导管主动脉瓣性能比较
JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 20;10:128-139. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.015. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Invasive versus echocardiographic gradients in degenerated surgical aortic valve prostheses: A multicenter study.退化性外科主动脉瓣人工瓣膜的侵入性与超声心动图压力阶差:一项多中心研究。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 17;7:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.06.029. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Surgically Treated Mitral Valve Disease and Preserved Ejection Fraction.手术治疗二尖瓣疾病且射血分数保留患者左心室整体纵向应变的预后意义
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 20;8:775533. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.775533. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of Transvalvular Aortic Mean Gradients Obtained by Intraprocedural Echocardiography and Invasive Measurement in Balloon and Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves.经皮球囊和自膨式经导管主动脉瓣内超声心动图与有创测量跨瓣主动脉平均梯度的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 5;10(19):e021014. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021014. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
8
The Lower, The Better? Think Beyond the Gradient after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Small Annulus.越低越好?经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗小瓣环时需超越梯度思考
Korean Circ J. 2021 Mar;51(3):232-234. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0547.
9
49 years of normal functioning Starr-Edwards aortic valve prosthesis.斯塔尔-爱德华兹主动脉瓣假体49年功能正常。
Oxf Med Case Reports. 2020 Feb 24;2020(2):omz141. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omz141. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
A multilayered valve leaflet promotes cell-laden collagen type I production and aortic valve hemodynamics.多层瓣膜小叶可促进含细胞的I型胶原蛋白生成及主动脉瓣血流动力学。
Biomaterials. 2020 May;240:119838. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119838. Epub 2020 Feb 12.