• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于拔除上颌第三磨牙的2%利多卡因加肾上腺素颊部注射。

Buccal injection of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for the removal of maxillary third molars.

作者信息

Yadav Sunil, Verma Ajay, Sachdeva Akash

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, P.D.M. Dental College & Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, India.

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 2013 Fall;60(3):95-8. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-60.3.95.

DOI:10.2344/0003-3006-60.3.95
PMID:24010986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3771203/
Abstract

The aim of the study was to demonstrate if 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:200,000 epinephrine could provide palatal anesthesia in maxillary tooth removal with a single buccal injection. The subjects included in the clinical study were those requiring extraction of the maxillary third molar of either side. For the purpose of comparison, the sample was randomly divided into 2 main groups: group 1 (study group) included 100 subjects who were to receive a single injection before extraction, and group 2 (control group) included 100 subjects who were to receive a single buccal injection and a single palatal injection before extraction. After 5 minutes the extraction was performed. All patients were observed for Faces Pain Scale during extraction and asked for the same on a 100-mm visual analog scale after extraction. According to visual analog scale and Faces Pain Scale scores, when maxillary third molar removal without palatal injection (study group) and with palatal injection (control group) were compared the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). Removal of maxillary third molars without palatal injection is possible by depositing 2 mL of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:200,000 epinephrine to the buccal vestibule of the tooth.

摘要

本研究的目的是证明含1:200,000肾上腺素的2%盐酸利多卡因通过单次颊侧注射能否在上颌牙拔除术中提供腭部麻醉。纳入临床研究的受试者为需要拔除双侧上颌第三磨牙的患者。为了进行比较,样本被随机分为2个主要组:第1组(研究组)包括100名在拔牙前接受单次注射的受试者,第2组(对照组)包括100名在拔牙前接受单次颊侧注射和单次腭侧注射的受试者。5分钟后进行拔牙。在拔牙过程中观察所有患者的面部疼痛量表评分,并在拔牙后要求他们在100毫米视觉模拟量表上进行评分。根据视觉模拟量表和面部疼痛量表评分,比较上颌第三磨牙拔除术在不进行腭侧注射(研究组)和进行腭侧注射(对照组)时的差异,差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。通过将2毫升含1:200,000肾上腺素的2%盐酸利多卡因注入牙齿的颊侧前庭,不进行腭侧注射拔除上颌第三磨牙是可行的。

相似文献

1
Buccal injection of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for the removal of maxillary third molars.用于拔除上颌第三磨牙的2%利多卡因加肾上腺素颊部注射。
Anesth Prog. 2013 Fall;60(3):95-8. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-60.3.95.
2
Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?不进行腭部注射能拔除上颌恒牙吗?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
3
Is palatal injection mandatory prior to extraction of permanent maxillary tooth: a preliminary study.拔除上颌恒牙前腭部注射是否必要:一项初步研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):100-2. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.80006.
4
Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于单纯性上颌牙拔除术的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Mar;25(3):181-4.
5
Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.单颊侧浸润麻醉与常规颊侧及腭侧注射麻醉用于上颌恒牙拔除的效率比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Mar;107(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
6
The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.阿替卡因和利多卡因等效剂量用于上颌磨牙拔除颊侧及非腭侧浸润麻醉的效果:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;76(4):737-743. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.上颌牙拔除时不腭侧注射阿替卡因与利多卡因的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3239-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2738-x. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
8
[Feasibility of permanent maxillary tooth removal using articaine anesthesia without palatal injection].使用阿替卡因麻醉且不进行腭部注射拔除上颌恒牙的可行性
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;26(4):416-8.
9
A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.比较含 1:100000 肾上腺素的 4%阿替卡因和含 1:80000 肾上腺素的 2%利多卡因在上颌牙髓炎牙齿中实现牙髓麻醉的效果。
J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
10
A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.普通利多卡因与含肾上腺素利多卡因局部麻醉溶液产生的口腔内注射不适比较:一项随机、双盲、双侧对照、志愿者调查。
Anesth Prog. 2002 Spring;49(2):44-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery.在上颌第三磨牙手术中,高浓度利多卡因与阿替卡因单次颊部浸润麻醉的比较
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):203-212. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.阿替卡因和利多卡因单次颊侧浸润与利多卡因常规颊侧和腭侧注射在上颌乳磨牙拔除术中的有效性:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186589.

本文引用的文献

1
Is it possible to anesthetize palatal tissues with buccal 4% articaine injection?用颊侧注射4%阿替卡因能否麻醉腭部组织?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 May;68(5):1032-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
2
Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中,4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因在下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉效果的比较研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007 Mar 1;12(2):E139-44.
3
Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?不进行腭部注射能拔除上颌恒牙吗?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
4
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale.晚期痴呆疼痛评估(PAINAD)量表的开发与心理测量学评估。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;4(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000043422.31640.F7.
5
Local anesthesia in the palate: a comparison of techniques and solutions.腭部局部麻醉:技术与溶液的比较
Anesth Prog. 2000 Winter;47(4):139-42.
6
Clinical evaluation of electronic dental anesthesia for various procedures in pediatric dentistry.儿童牙科各种操作中电子牙科麻醉的临床评估。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000 Spring;24(3):199-204.
7
Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic.阿替卡因的疗效:一种新型酰胺类局部麻醉剂。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 May;131(5):635-42. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0237.
8
Evaluating the efficacy of commonly used topical anesthetics.评估常用局部麻醉剂的疗效。
Pediatr Dent. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):197-200.
9
How to overcome failed local anaesthesia.如何克服局部麻醉失败
Br Dent J. 1999 Jan 9;186(1):15-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800006.
10
A comparison of topical anaesthesia and electronic nerve stimulation for reducing the pain of intra-oral injections.
Br Dent J. 1996 Nov 9;181(9):333-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809252.