School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane, QLD 4111 Australia.
J Adolesc. 2013 Oct;36(5):871-81. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Impulsivity is clearly associated with adolescent substance use. However, contemporary models of impulsivity argue against a unitary construct and propose at least two potential facets of impulsivity: reward drive and disinhibition. This study investigated the mediating role of prosocial risk-taking in the association between these two facets of impulsivity, family environment, and substance use in Grade 8 students, age 12-14 years (N = 969). For girls, traits related to disinhibition referred to as rash impulsivity were directly associated with greater substance use and, unexpectedly, reward drive was indirectly associated with greater substance use through participation in physical-risk activities, which itself predicted greater use. For boys, participation in physical-risk activities was the only direct predictor of substance use and, as in girls, reward drive conveyed indirect risk through this pathway. Family environment, reward drive, and rash impulsivity were associated with participation in performance-risk activities, and prosocial behavior more generally, but neither of these hypothesized mediators was related to substance use.
冲动与青少年物质使用明显相关。然而,冲动的当代模型反对单一结构,并提出了至少两种潜在的冲动方面:奖励驱动和抑制解除。本研究调查了亲社会冒险行为在冲动的这两个方面、家庭环境和物质使用之间的关联中的中介作用,参与者为 8 年级学生,年龄在 12-14 岁(N=969)。对于女孩来说,与抑制解除相关的特质,即冲动性鲁莽,与更大的物质使用直接相关,出乎意料的是,奖励驱动通过参与身体风险活动与更大的物质使用间接相关,而身体风险活动本身就预示着更大的使用量。对于男孩来说,参与身体风险活动是物质使用的唯一直接预测因素,与女孩一样,奖励驱动通过这种途径传达了间接风险。家庭环境、奖励驱动和冲动性鲁莽与参与表现风险活动以及更普遍的亲社会行为有关,但这些假设的中介因素都与物质使用无关。