Suppr超能文献

影响青光眼患者阳性捕捉试验患病率的因素。

Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.

作者信息

Reynolds M, Stewart W C, Sutherland S

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228(4):338-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00920059.

Abstract

We evaluated factors that influence the catch-trial response in automated perimetry by consecutively examining 408 glaucoma patients (703 eyes) with either the program 30-2 or a 76-point screen with a quantified defect on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. The prevalence of positive catch trials using both programs was: 15.9% fixation losses, 5.5% false-positives, and 17.0% false-negatives. The only significant difference between the two programs was a lower prevalence of false-negatives on the program 30-2 (P less than 0.01). False-positive responses showed a significant positive correlation to fixation losses, and the catch trial response in general was correlated significantly to defect depth, test time, age, and visual acuity (P less than 0.05). This study suggests that the prevalence of positive catch trials is not an independent variable when testing glaucoma patients with automated perimetry and is not reduced by using a screening strategy over a full-threshold exam.

摘要

我们通过使用Humphrey视野分析仪上的30-2程序或76点筛查程序连续检查408例青光眼患者(703只眼),评估了影响自动视野检查中捕捉试验反应的因素。两个程序中阳性捕捉试验的发生率分别为:固视丢失15.9%,假阳性5.5%,假阴性17.0%。两个程序之间唯一显著的差异是30-2程序中假阴性的发生率较低(P小于0.01)。假阳性反应与固视丢失呈显著正相关,总体上捕捉试验反应与缺损深度、检查时间、年龄和视力显著相关(P小于0.05)。本研究表明,在对青光眼患者进行自动视野检查时,阳性捕捉试验的发生率不是一个独立变量,并且与全阈值检查相比,使用筛查策略并不能降低该发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验